Man, Danstar Nottingham is FAST!!!

brad26 said:

Will one pack of Nottingham work for higher gravity beers, say beers with OGs of 1.070, 80, 90+? Or should 2 packs be used?

Click to expand...

Mr Malty says:

1.2 11.5g packages of dry yeast for a 1.070
1.5 11.5g packages of dry yeast for a 1.090

This assumes you properly rehydrate a fresh package of yeast and for ales only, lagers take much more.

http://www.mrmalty.com/calc/calc.html

GT

curlyfat said:

I've used Notty a lot. While it's super fast and way flocculent, I feel like it is not a very "clean" yeast. It usually takes an extra couple of weeks after ferment to clean itself up. When I use WYeast 1056 (I usually use a big starter, then use slurry for batch after batch, after batch), I can have my blonde ale ready to go in a little over a week tasting clean and delicious.

You can't beat the convenience combined with quality and value that you get with Notty, though. I can't argue that.

Click to expand...

You might try fermenting at the cooler range for nottingham (it will go down to 54F for pseudolagers) as that reduces the fruity esters it will produce at the higher range.

GT

Well, I use nottingham to three years in all my beers, I've used s-04 too, but prefers to stay with notty, use it to light up barleywines ales, starter never did, and always worked well, fermented in 2 days But I always leave the secondary for two more weeks to clarify. Cheap, easy to use and store, and with good results.

nostalgia said:

I use US-05 a lot and like how clean and consistent it is. I tried Notty recently when I made a 10-gallon batch of BM's Centennial Blonde (which is freakin' delicious - go brew some).

Anyway, I did an 11 gallon batch and split it between two fermenters. I pitched a packet of Notty in each.

One was down to 1.006 and in the keg in three days. The other hadn't even krausened yet. It took well over a week to ferment out. Both were delicious - got a nice little fruit note from the Notty - but the difference in ferment times was crazy.

So add me to the list of lag issues with Notty.

-Joe

Click to expand...

+1

I ended up pitching the Notty (after hydrating) and I have to agree that it had a long lag compared to what I typically get with a starter. It must've been two days before I saw any activity. Even an unstarted liquid moves quicker than that.

The end result is what matters though. We'll see how it cleans up in 3 weeks.

In good news, I did another 10 gallons of the same beer, pitching Notty again. Both took off at the same time, showing activity after about 12 hours and in full krausen by 24.

-Joe

nostalgia said:

In good news, I did another 10 gallons of the same beer, pitching Notty again. Both took off at the same time, showing activity after about 12 hours and in full krausen by 24.

-Joe

Click to expand...

I'm assuming you mean by "activity" you're referring to airlock activity, right?

No - the first activity I saw was stuff forming on top of the previously clear wort. Then came the very vigorous activity in the blowoff and a large, fluffy krausen.

-Joe

Recently, I bought some packets of notty, and the two that opened up until now, were very different than usual, at first thought it was only the appearance of grain, but during the transfer to the second fermenter, I realized that I still had many grains without dissolve in the bottom of the carboy, and the beer was very cloudy and strong taste of yeast.

Someone else noticed this change?

I used to just pitch my notty directly until a while back when I ended up with 10 packets of bad yeast from the bad batch that was out. I began starting my yeast just to make sure it was good before I pitched it. Now, I always keep some wort around and I just start it the night before and then pitch it the next day. It works great, I only use one packet for 10 - 12 gallons of wort, I usually have full kreusen layer by that evening. I love the flavors I get from notty and am a really die hard user. I had one beer that I almost dumped from the bad batch, but I kept it around for a year and it finally became quite enjoyable.

I'm having problems with the latest packages, the flakes of yeast dont dissolved in the wort not even after 12 hours, and still no sign of fermentation.
someone had the same problem?

Interesting timing on this post. I used Danstar Nottingham for the first time this weekend and had airlock activity within 4 hours!
I have always used WLP liquid yeast thinking it was the bomb but this Danstar was more than half the price and way more active. My last batch with WLP took 30 hours to see airlock activity. I just poured the dry yeast on top of the wort and let her go! She is bubbling like a mutha as we speak.
Dry yeast for me, no looking back.

it used to be that way, activity in few hours but the last order i did, the yeas take 48h to start. Im afraid it have too long time to contaminate, and its ferment with no krausen... Is that a bad thing?

in a sealed bucket no probs. yeast was building up cell count that whole time to start an active fermentation, most likely reproducing faster than any "bugs"