Typically I naturally carbonate as I'm usually pretty good at keeping my pipeline pretty full so I can afford the extra time. Recently, in order to have that 4th beer on tap for a party we threw, I force carbed a beer. It seems to me, that this beer (what's left) is aging more slowly than other beers I've made. So that got me thinking what is the impact of having the yeast in the keg for the aging process? +1 points if you correctly figured out that this is just a tweak/rewording of the "should I force or naturally carb" question. Do the yeast help the beer "mature" more quickly. Or conversely in a style like an IPA, do they contribute to the loss of aroma over time?
I just got a 20lb tank from a paintball fan buddy of mine, so now I have a complete bear family (papa, mama, baby) of CO2 tanks. Now I really can easily force carb my beers as I have the extra tank. The question is, is there an aging benefit to having the extra yeast in the keg typical of a natural carb. I'm about ready to keg my first lager of the season and I'm debating natural vs force carb. I don't have a preference for doing one procedure over the other in terms of work at kegging time, and I'm not in a rush to get the beers on tap.
I just got a 20lb tank from a paintball fan buddy of mine, so now I have a complete bear family (papa, mama, baby) of CO2 tanks. Now I really can easily force carb my beers as I have the extra tank. The question is, is there an aging benefit to having the extra yeast in the keg typical of a natural carb. I'm about ready to keg my first lager of the season and I'm debating natural vs force carb. I don't have a preference for doing one procedure over the other in terms of work at kegging time, and I'm not in a rush to get the beers on tap.