Only flame out addition

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

CBMbrewer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
760
Reaction score
63
I have heard that a lot of commercial breweries only do a bittering addition at the beginning of the boil and than a flame out/whirlpool addition for a certain amount of time. Specifically I have seen it stated in many places that Stone only does an addition at 90mins and then a huge whirlpool addition. Clearly they get a huge amount of flavor and aroma with this method. The other day I came across this:
http://www.bear-flavored.com/2013/07/the-benefits-of-hop-stand-whirlpool.html
Basically the write up argues that boiling your flavor and aroma additions will waste some of the flavor and aroma you would get due to the acids being boiled off and isomerized in the boil and the best way to get as much flavor and aroma from your hops is the do a long hop stand at high but not boiling temperatures.
What is the validity of this idea?
 
Try looking into hop-bursting as well. I haven't tried it yet since it's supposed to require a lot of hops added at the end to be effective, but it is supposed to be very good at imparting those super-fresh hop aromas that Stone achieves so often.
 
You should check out the latest addition of Zymurgy. It has an article specifically about this technique.
 
Thats a good question I sure someone knows. Personally I have been playing with doing no 60 min or flavor hops and instead using first wort for flavor and bittering then doing a flame out addition. So far it has turned out great.
 
Try looking into hop-bursting as well. I haven't tried it yet since it's supposed to require a lot of hops added at the end to be effective, but it is supposed to be very good at imparting those super-fresh hop aromas that Stone achieves so often.

I have hop bursted a few times before and have been very pleased with the results. The idea behind this is getting most of your ibus from the additions in the last 10 to 15 minutes. The idea with only doing a addition at the beginning and end of the boil, as i understand it, is to get your ibu's were you want them to be from that first bittering addition then *only flavor and aroma from the flame out addition and getting negligible ibus from them due to not boiling.

You should check out the latest addition of Zymurgy. It has an article specifically about this technique.

Definitely need to! Any place online I can read it, or at least that one article for free?


I guess my real question is: what is the difference between adding all of your flavor/aroma hops right as you cut off the flame or boiling them for those last 10 minutes or so, other then the obvious ibu's you would get from boiling them?
 
Basically the idea is that you have one bitter addition to achieve the IBU levels you want and then concentrate all the flavor and aroma at the end of the boil, 15 minutes to flame out in large amounts

The longer the hops boil the more of the flavor and aroma compound break down and are essentially rendered useless or less than what you want. Some flavor/aroma hops don't even provide a good pleasant bitter addition

The book "Hops" is a great resource for your brewing library
 
Basically the idea is that you have one bitter addition to achieve the IBU levels you want and then concentrate all the flavor and aroma at the end of the boil, 15 minutes to flame out in large amounts

The longer the hops boil the more of the flavor and aroma compound break down and are essentially rendered useless or less than what you want. Some flavor/aroma hops don't even provide a good pleasant bitter addition

The book "Hops" is a great resource for your brewing library

Right. I have done hop bursting before and loved it. I'm just trying to understand the difference between hop bursting and adding all of your late additions at flameout. If the longer the hops are boiled, the more flavor/aroma compounds are lost, why not add all the late additions after the boil for a long, hot hopstand?
 
CBMbrewer said:
Right. I have done hop bursting before and loved it. I'm just trying to understand the difference between hop bursting and adding all of your late additions at flameout. If the longer the hops are boiled, the more flavor/aroma compounds are lost, why not add all the late additions after the boil for a long, hot hopstand?

Flavor compounds mostly come out around the 20-30 minute mark of the boil. I don't know how much you'd get by adding everything at flameout.
 
Flavor compounds mostly come out around the 20-30 minute mark of the boil. I don't know how much you'd get by adding everything at flameout.

Okay. So there is validity to the labels "flavor addition" and "aroma addition". A 10 min boil will give you more aroma then flavor whereas a 20 min boil will give you more flavor then aroma?
 
CBMbrewer said:
Okay. So there is validity to the labels "flavor addition" and "aroma addition". A 10 min boil will give you more aroma then flavor whereas a 20 min boil will give you more flavor then aroma?

That's my understanding of it, hence why you don't get flavor out of dry-hopping additions.
 
Some breweries like Crooked Stave only do a whirlpool addition. That's all, no other additions at all. The goal is to keep the bitterness low on all their beers, but still get the right amount of aroma and flavor, given the time it takes them to whirlpool and chill. You're still getting IBUs, even from a whirlpool addition, if it takes you 15 - 25 minutes to complete whirlpool and chill.
 
It would be a great idea, but you would need to be able to whirlpool and crash cool plus have the freshest hops.
 
Back
Top