As a suggestion I would try to add a short length of the same diameter tubing as a buffer between the two exits. This should make the pump operate smoother and last longer with less vibration as the rollers will be evenly engaged at all times.
At some point once I finish getting an actual motor connected to this I want to test the longevity of the tubing so I can make plans to replace it on a regular schedule rather than have a failure in the middle of a brew.
The issue I am having with the 360° design is the spiral in the tubing causes it to slowly creep up the wall of the pump head and eventually it moves clear of the roller causing the pumping to fail. In this design I added a second wheel (still have 2 to spare) and the tubing now sits on a flat plane rather than a spiral. The second wheel was needed to maintain occlusion since the tubing only covers 250° of the circumference now.
Coupler came in yesterday so I finally had a chance to put the stepper motor to the real test. Unfortunately the results were a mixed bag.
Any progress on the pump?
subscribed. Can't wait to see the final product
Subscribed. This is one of the most badass things i've seen on HBT.
Man, the pressure is on. Thanks all!Subscribed. This is so full of win.
lschiavo said:If I understand, the nylon spacer will rotate between the washers? Do you think that will cause much wear with the nylon rubbing on the threads?
Just an idea, but I got a deal a long while back on a bunch of roller blade bearings and have used them in a ton of projects. A few of those stacked as a roller might work well.
Correct, the washers aren't tightened down so the nylon standoffs can rotate freely. I hope there won't be enough pressure to wear the nylon out. A few post ago I showed a 3D model that uses bearings instead of the standoffs. The spacers were less than $0.50 so I thought I would give em a shot before buying the bearings online. Thanks for the input!
Looked like a production model to me.From the cardboard in the picture you will clearly see the microcontroller circuit has a lot of work left.
Looked like a production model to me.
No need - I'm an EE, and it was a joke.Maybe I should clarify
Foosinho said:No need - I'm an EE, and it was a joke.
lschiavo said:I'm an EE nerd, I got it
Maybe I should clarify,
This goes up there with "I think i'll make my own touchscreen today."
I feel like a bit of an outsider, I'm not EE. But I did stay @ a Holiday Inn Express last night.
TFB I really liked the video of the test, thanks for posting. It seem in the video that the motor is rather loud. What is your opinion? I only have experience with the march/chugger pumps.
Anything new to report?
That's not even a real picture. I think you're just making things up.
Sorry, not much new stuff on the pumps. I wired up the new motor, performed a quick test, and then moved onto the next components of the brewery that needed to be worked on.
Just putting the finishing touches on the layout and then I will send the PCB files out to be created. This control board has a dedicated PIC18F25K22 (hidden under the blue LPCXpresso board) to perform the stepper motor control. The standalone controller should allow for more accurate timing and no missed steps. The LPCXpresso board can only allow a single frequency for the PWM output where the PIC18 can provide individual frequencies per channel.
Enter your email address to join: