Starter - at the risk of flogging a dead horse

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

GroovePuppy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Messages
1,734
Reaction score
7
So I used a Wyeast pack for my Nut Brown on Saturday just used it straight from the pack. I see a ton of discussion here about "lack of yeasties" and liquid yeasts particularly benefiting from a starter but the folks at the local HBS store didn't seem to think it was worthwhile at all. In fact saying they looked at me like I just took a dump in the middle of the store wouldn't be completely inaccurate, saying I was being given old information.

I have to say overall that I went into my HBS on Friday for ingredients all pumped up from the inputs you guys had given me and they totally burst my bubble. The grain/flavor contributions were pooh-poohed, the yeast starter was dismissed, my recipes were ignored and replaced, albeit with some discussion, and they just generally aren't as welcoming to a noob as I'd hoped. Especially given that people like me are the future of their business.

Anyway, rant aside, and given that the Wyeast pack did say it was suitable for 5gallons of beer wort, if you guys say starters are better (by some consensus) then I'll start ignoring the HBS folks. In fact I think I'll resist asking for their input at all. My fermentation started nicely within 24 hours and is chugging along nicely, and the wort tasted like it should work out nice, but still.....

Like I said I realize I'm beating an old subject into the ground but what's a lad to do when he's given a bunch of very helpful and logical advice from such a large and diverse group as yourselves, so obviously wealthy in experience, only to be led into doubt by one small group of individuals that thinks everyone else is wrong and the Earth is indeed flat! :mad:
 
Ya see, that's what I was worried about. I had an OG of 1.058 and a little over 4.5 gallons at time of pitch. Mr Malty says I should've used two packs with no starter.

OK, that's enough to convince me. In future I listen only to the wise words at HBT.:mug:
 
The general consensus has always been that you don't need a starter for average gravity ales but they are good practice nonetheless.

They probably discourage Noobs from making starters just because it's more crap to learn and deal with and many, many, many great beers have been made and will be made without them. I still use them though.
 
The general consensus has always been that you don't need a starter for average gravity ales but they are good practice nonetheless.

There you go. "Good practice" was exactly what I thought but the HBS staff acted like they'd never heard of such a thing. They didn't say "well you shouldn't need one but if you'd feel less anxious" or "some people prefer the security of higher yeast count" or "I plugged the numbers into Mr Malty myself and it says ixnay on the arterstay". No, they just dismissed the idea.

May all their home brews taste like cat pee from now on! :D
 
There is enough viable yeast in a smack pack for a 5 gallon batch. But I will guarantee that your lag time will be at least 8-12 hours before you have a good fermentation going. With a starter you will likely see decent action in less than 4-6 hours. With that said, giving your yeasties a head start gives you a faster start and less risk of contamination.

And to each their own. DO what you feel comfortable with. I make a starter with all my beers, light or heavy. I've never had an issue and sometimes ferment out a lot faster, which gets them into my belly faster.
 
The worst thing a starter can provide you is insurance you didn't need. The downside is giving up a cup or two of DME and a half hour or less of your time. The upside is healthier yeast that you know is viable. A starter gives you a better chance of making better beer with minimal cost. Plus, you get some peace of mind. That's just hard to beat.


TL
 
I made my first few batches without a starter, but after that, I always make a starter. I will say that if you don't have good sanitation practices, which many noobs lack, then learn as much about sanitation as possible. I started out using the Joy Of Homebrewing as a reference, even using a plastic juice bottle as a vessel for the starter. Now I just use a 2000ml flask that I do on a camping stove...no worry about sanitation.
 
I just used a starter for the first time about a week ago and although the beer is a good month or so from drinking...I can already say I probably will use a starter on all batches now. Before when I would use the White Labs vial alone, it took a few days for fermentation to start, and it wasn't very aggressive. My ending gravities didn't seem low enough either....

This last batch with the starter took off in about 7 or 8 hours and fermented strong for about 3 days. I'm much more confident in the beer and less anxious about something having gone wrong.

Plus, since my starter had fermented vigorously, I knew the yeast was good and wasn't wondering if I'd have to re-pitch, or take hydro readings to see if what it was doing (risking contamination)...

I recommend the starter....a 2 lb bag of DME will make a bunch of starters so it doesn't add a bunch of expense to the batch either...

My HBS shop owner balked at first when I mentioned making a starter (I think it's because they worry that customers will just buy smack packs or dry yeast online instead of their refridgerated liquid yeast)....but I told him I just wanted to make the best beer I could...he nodded his head and said a starter was the way to go....
 
OK....another noob question...wouldn't it just be easier to put two packets or vials of yeast to start?..... It's not that much more expensive.... Or is that a no-no??
 
aw. Where's the horse?

I was looking to take out some aggression!

Here ya go my friend....

beating_a_dead_horse.jpg
 
OK....another noob question...wouldn't it just be easier to put two packets or vials of yeast to start?..... It's not that much more expensive.... Or is that a no-no??

Well, you can certainly do that. I think it's too expensive- I mean liquid yeast is already nearly 1/2 the cost of the batch sometimes, when it costs $8 per pack or so, or more if you have it shipped.

I have a ton of hops in my freezer, and sometimes I get grain for $1.20/pound. So, for one batch, the grain may be $12, the yeast $6-8, and I DON'T want to spend another $6-8 for just yeast. I actually wash yeast and save it, so I rarely buy yeast. But using two packages is definitely better than underpitching. If I didn't make starters and wash yeast, I'd probably want to buy more yeast. Especially with lagers- you need about 4 vials of yeast for a lager if you don't make a starter.
 
OK....another noob question...wouldn't it just be easier to put two packets or vials of yeast to start?..... It's not that much more expensive.... Or is that a no-no??

Only if you have extra money you don't care about. Or if you only brew like every few months. Otherwise, it does add up, not to mention...it's fun, it's like brewing a small beer!
 
First - the yeasties. Making a starter is, in my opinion, always a good idea. You get healthier yeast, a quicker fermentation (eliminating the lag time when wort is more vulnerable to infection due to lack of alcohol and a protective co2 blanket) and its a "best practices" thing that is just a good idea. In general, pitch rates are calculated to arrive at an appropriate number of cells so that the yeast don't have to stress and propagate to the point where they really go to work, which can effect the predictability of the flavor profile the yeast contributes. Pitching at an appropriate rate is a great thing for a beginner because you get a more accurate sense of what various yeasts contribute to a beer. Keep on keepin on.

The HBS - I go to the same one. I know the dump-on-the-floor look. I got it when I tried to talk to them about temperature control for a direct fire mash tun. The response was that it wasn’t needed since grains from a 10g batch only lose 1-2 degrees in an hour anyway. At one point I was advised that pumps were a bad idea because the guy who is the main brew-thinker in the store thinks moving wort does bad things to the beer. I'm assuming they were talking about HSA. In the meantime, they sell four types of pumps and all the gear you need to for yeast farming and starters. SWMBO dropped by the other day to pick up some grains and was asked about whether she needed yeast. When she told them that I harvest my own they were apparently shocked and she was told that yeast harvesting was "really really advanced." Now, harvesting and washing yeast is not something entry level folks generally think of but I am of the opinion that its not "really really advanced." Anyway, there are good folks there but they have a pretty basic approach to brewing - which isn't bad, but is not always best practice stuff. I came to the decision a while ago that I just kinda keep my mad-scientist-schemes to myself, get the grains and go.

In the meantime, HBT probably has the best brewing cognoscenti this side of Munich.
 
Thanks for the input Gordie. Glad to see it's not just me at our LHBS getting the look. They also make a lot of assumptions about what question you're asking and don't listen to what you are actually asking. I think I'll use 'em for supplies but limit my conversations. :D
 
In the meantime, HBT probably has the best brewing cognoscenti this side of Munich.

I agree...though I've been lucky with LHBS staff, I do get shocked at some of the backwards ideas and erronaeous info that a lot of brewers, including entire brew clubs operate under. My nephew's club is still stuck in the midset that you shouldn't use aluminum to brew in, so they buy turkey fryers and toss out the pots...and there's so much other things that they say, when I'm at their events that just floor me....

We've got a great body of knowledge here....
 
Back
Top