Whitbread......I knew it wasn't the best. I actually was going to harvest it and reuse it for a stout.....but that's out.
Don't get me wrong! I make no claims or estimations as to the
quality of the strain, good or bad. Whitbread is a fabu yeast if you're looking for the characteristics the strain imparts. It's just a bit more labor-intensive than we homebrewers are used to.
In terms of time, the wheat and the brown had more than enough time at 3 weeks. In my estimation, if an ale yeast takes longer than 3 weeks to ferment at 66 degrees.......I'll try another strain next time around.
I'm patient, but have no time for lazy yeast!
It's not that they're lazy, really. They merely have characteristics with which the brewer must deal. There's no qualitative difference between, say, Whitbread and Czech Pils yeast - both have certain characteristics, and both have requirements the brewer must meet before they will function properly. You wouldn't ***** at a lager yeast not doing its job properly if you didn't provide it the correct environment, would you? Same for Whitbread.
If you were after a certain characteristic imparted by the strain - like the butterscotch esters from Ringwood - I'd advise to keep using it. Some of those characteristics can be unique (like the aforementioned butterscotch). You'd just have to remember the strain's
other characteristics and cope with them.
If you were just after a fruity English ale yeast, seek elsewhere; there are plenty of alternatives.
I'd reuse the cake for your stout. Pitching onto the cake will probably attenuate the stout wort fully before the yeast have time to figure out that they're lazy (you're really just overpitching, technically). Keep an eye on it, though - if attenuation starts to slow, you'll have to rouse it.
Think of it as a learning experience for your memoirs.
Bob