While I agree with the above, I like the big beefy look of the lag bolts and screws, but structurally I also feel that a 3 1/2 deck screw is also more than adequate!
To each his own...
To each his own...
Nice rig! I see a lot of people using bolts (lag screws?) on wood brew stands. I was trying to figure how necessary this is. You appear to have quite a bit of "woodworking" knowledge, or at least tools, so I was wondering if you or others might be able to provide insight on why using these fasteners vs other traditional wood joinery methods. Is it just so it can be taken apart easily? Or is their truly a structural benefit. Or just a time thing?
I used the swing set I built for my daughter as a baseline design for construction. It used lag bolts, washers, and nuts at all the major structural junctions and survived Katrina, so I wanted my brewstand to be that solid since I knew I was going to have a couple hundred pounds on it potentially between all the vessels. I don't trust deck screws for that. I plan to use them on my mill station, but that's not going to be bearing that much weight.I happen to really love your set up. Very similar to mine. I also was wondering about the lag bolt attachment method. Did you have a bunch laying around that you wanted to put to use? I used deck screws and it's pretty darn solid.
I don't think that's wood??
Ironwood.
I don't think that's wood??
All I know is that, is on this site, overkill /overdone/ overbuilt is the norm... next people will be making rigs out of poured concrete with rebar.
brew stand is actually 3 moveable piececs.
That is an interesting idea. It means more hardware, cuts, etc, but it also gives a big mobility bonus. How has it been in use? Do you find it annoying that pieces move around more or have you enjoyed the flexibility?
I can't speak for everyone, but I can get about four crown bolt junctions for the cost of a single joist hanger. I also wouldn't say "all those lags" in my case since I tried to be quite strategic in my use of crown bolts, washers, and nuts vs. deck screws.deck screws vs. lag bolts...
I would rather use joist hangers, hurricane straps, and appropriate sized screws than have to drill numerous holes to accommodate all those lags
That wood that is lost is replaced by zinc-plated steel. And how much bigger is the hole when considering the aggregate size of an adequate number of deck screws to give the same result?Drilling obviously removes wood which in turn lessens the structural integrity of said wood.
No, it was pressure-treated pine. Granted, they were also 4x4s, which is why I didn't sink them as deeply on the brewstand.Also, that outdoor playset some one mentioned is most likely made of cedar which is a completely different wood than the pine or fir most of you guys are building with.
Well, I did consider Durock for the deck under the burners at one point, so guilty as charged I suppose.All I know is that, is on this site, overkill /overdone/ overbuilt is the norm... next people will be making rigs out of poured concrete with rebar
rbwduece said:Just realized the thread topic specified "wood"...ooops
That wood that is lost is replaced by zinc-plated steel. And how much bigger is the hole when considering the aggregate size of an adequate number of deck screws to give the same result?
You do realize the ultimate result of this sort of phrase generally, right?not trying to be a dick... but,
You realize that screws break the grain, just as much, if not more, right? Drilling a hole for a crown bolt, two washers, and a nut will generally not cause a split along the grain since that material is 'lost'. I have seen deck screws split an inch either way. That doesn't go away. With a crown bolt, the wood isn't replaced, but the space is. With a screw, that wood still has to go somewhere. It usually expands to the sides as a split. That's why I use crown bolts and not lag screws (despite the fact that a lag screw would work the same as a smaller size but higher number of deck screws).the wood isn't "replaced" by the lag, you've destroyed the integrity by "breaking" the grain, which is where the strength lies.
Well, except for the aforementioned splits that they cause from the sideways pressure they exert on the grain.All the lag does is exert a downward pressure on the reduced mass of the wood at the bottom of the hole you drilled. In other words, if you drilled a hole in the flat of a 2x4 and stuck your lag through, all the wood that supports it is only 2" thick. A screw, on the other hand, doesn't remove any material, it wedges itself IN the grain (where all the strength is) and is held by all the friction points on threads.
I really couldn't care less for coolness or looks from that perspective. All I can tell you is that the structures I've built hold over time and under adverse conditions. YMMV. Admittedly, that's anecdotal evidence, but I don't see much empirical evidence to the contrary being provided in return.But, I will say, the lag heads do look cool.
I used lag bolts, because I bought a box when I built the boat rack.
Oh man, look what I started! People now feel obligated to defend their fastener of choice!
Oh man, look what I started! People now feel obligated to defend their fastener of choice!
Absolutely true.I do have to say, fastener choice does not replace good design.
I really need to make a single tier stand. I bought a welder, I just have to stop being so lazy. Not all wood but it sits on a rolling wood platform.
View attachment 171270
I have drawn a lot of inspiration from this thread, so thanks everyone! My stand itself is basically done, but I will still sand the whole thing down, add some pegboard and hooks on the back, add my pump and CF chiller, etc. I will post again when it is completely done...
Just got the new kettle in last night. Am awaiting just a few parts to complete the quick disconnect lines and it will be ready to test drive.
... I'll cut a hole in the top of the bench to allow my BK to come up through maybe an inch or so.
Here is a really bad drawing of what I'm thinking. Do you guys think this will work. Eventually I'd like to have a single tier with pumps and I think this allows me to maintain the single tier option while giving me the 3 tier gravity that I need in the short term.
Why not just remove the boards for the BK? Then there's no risk in the heat coming up around the kettle from catching fire to the boards that were cut. Also, you can reuse the boards when/if you go back to a single tier.
I've been thinking about modifying my existing bench. Right now it's a single tier, but I have no pumps or anything. I'd like to spruce it up a bit and modify it for a three tier system until I can buy a pump. With that in mind I've been trying to think of a way to do a three tier system while not eliminating the single tier base. What I've come up with is the following:
I'm going to lower the single tier to about 3 feet high. My MT will sit on this. I'll build a riser on the bench to place my Bayou Classic SP10 and HLT on. Then I'll cut a hole in the top of the bench to allow my BK to come up through maybe an inch or so.
Here is a really bad drawing of what I'm thinking. Do you guys think this will work. Eventually I'd like to have a single tier with pumps and I think this allows me to maintain the single tier option while giving me the 3 tier gravity that I need in the short term.
maybe buy a piece or two of sheet metal and cut it up and wrap the pieces with the sheet metal.
Alright, next question - what's the best wood to go with? If seen everything. Cedar looks like it could be a tad bit expensive, untreated pine?
Enter your email address to join: