Critique my chilling process please, want beer chilled faster.

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

boswell

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Messages
377
Reaction score
14
Location
philadelphia
In Philly, ground water is balmy 80 degrees this afternoon. So I took my old immersion chiller and had it in a bucket of ice water hooked up to a hose. So here's my 'flow' hose through immersion chiller, then into CFC from top inlet then exiting through the bottom, with wort being pumped from the bottom inlet, out the top of the CFC and back into the kettle to help chill entire mass.

This still took an hour to get to just over 80 degrees, and who knows how many gallons of water down the drain.

This was my first time using this method, usually I am better at regaining the waste water, but today was a clustercuss of variables. I'd like to waste less water and waste less time (more importantly). With these two chillers at my disposal, what's the most efficient way to chill wort reasonably? Am I missing something? I really would prefer not to purchase a plate chiller. In the past I've just used the immersion chiller and pumped back into the kettle near the coils, but seemed to take nearly the same amount of time. Any suggestions?
 
were you moving the coil in the ice water around a lot, if not you should because the wort heats up the water around the ice and the ice doesn't necessarily cool it back down again unless you agitate it. That might help...
 
The wort didn't pass through the immersion chiller, just the CFC, the chilling water is the only thing that passed through the immersion chiller. My thinking was this would use less ice, because I'd only be chilling the ground water that would pass through the CFC.
 
^ Nonetheless, you need to agitate the ice in the bucket to maximize your speed using a "pre-chiller" setup like that.

My suggestion. Flow it fast through your setup without any water/ice in the bucket. This runs counter to the idea of saving water, but I've found flowing it fast early greatly decreases cooling time and thus, water usage.

When you're down to about 100F, throw your ice (as much as you can fit) and then H20 (I fill the bucket (now filled with ice) about 1/2 way with water). Slow the flow of H20 through the setup so the groundwater spends more time in contact with the ice water surrounding the pre chiller.

Agitate your ice/water mix in the bucket as much as possible. At least every 5 minutes.....

If you slow the flow through your prechiller enough, and agitate the ice water in the bucket (the same phenomenon applies here, you need the heat exchanger (coils in this case) to be in close contact with the ice as much as possible, and agitating the ice water helps to this end), I bet with 80F ground water you can still chill it into the 70-ish range. Doing it this way will decrease your current time to cool.

Adding ice to the prechiller bucket right away is a waste of ice IME. The ability of say 70F water to to cool 200F wort is not much better then the ability of 80F water to do it. So that's why I recommend waiting to add ice/water to the prechiller bucket until you're at or below 100F.
 
Agree with jbay- you're not cutting down on time, but you do save on ice that way. Fast chilling is all about temperature differential, so groundwater temps are fine for your initial 100F drop, then you can bust out the ice for the hard stuff (chilling from 100F to 60F).
 
Yes agreed, I forgot to mention that u should use the pre-chilling ice after you get to about 120F. Its easy to get it down to there with 80F water but after that it gets a bit harder. Agitating the pre-chiller in the ice is what I meant...
 
Sounds good, I'll report back with results. These ideas seem sound. I'd like this to work without additional purchases. Getting the wort below 100 makes a lot of sense, I blew through all of my ice before I got below 90 today, so it makes more sense, perhaps to get it below, then ice, then slow the flow.
 
Go for smaller diameter annealed copper pipe - this increases the surface area - go for a coil with a bigger length of this small copper pipe - this also increases the surface area - go for a slower flow through the coil - this increases the contact time.

with 80 degree groundwater you should get down to 85 quite easily - then switch the coil to a large bucket of ice and run the wort through for a second time.
 
I have a pump inlet taking in ice water from a bucket into my immersion chiller that is sitting in my wort. I take the water discharge into another bucket so it does not warm up the ice water. I have to fill the ice water bucket with more ice and water a couple of times during chilling. I agitate the wort to make sure there are no cool spots around the immersion chiller. With this approach I can cool the wort to 65 degrees in about 15 minutes.
 
I've also considered this approach using a submersible pump to pump ice water through the immersion chiller, and pumping my wort out of the kettle and back around the immersion chiller.
 
I've started using a submersible pump to recirculate ice water directly through my CFC. Cuts down on wasted water and I get from boiling to pitching temp in less than ten minutes.
 
You have about 3 options here that would be efficient and require minimal extra equipment:

1. Build a prechiller
2. Put your wort in an ice bucket while you are running the chiller
3. Be more patient and once it hits about 80 deg, put the wort in your fermenter and then move it to your temperature control device (swamp cooler, cooler, etc.). Then pitch the yeast once it cools down.
 
I live in Tucson and can chill my wort down to 50F if I wanted to in less than 10 minutes with this method.

I have a good sized cooler, not sure the exact size but it is probably about 10 gal or so, and fill it with ice water. I pump the ice water through a CFC and back into the cooler. It works awesome, but takes a ton of ice. Good luck to you.
 
boswell said:
I've also considered this approach using a submersible pump to pump ice water through the immersion chiller, and pumping my wort out of the kettle and back around the immersion chiller.

I do a version of this. I have a 3 kettle 2 pump system. Pump 1 handles wort. I begin a recirculating whirlpool in my kettle about 10 min before flame out. This sanitizes the pump and tubing.

At flameout, I leave the whirlpool running and start up my immersion chiller with hose water. My last brew day, my hose water registered 79f. The agitation of the whirlpool knocks the kettle down fast. I got 10 gallons from boiling to about 85F in 25 min last time

At this point, I kill the hose water and fill one of my other vessels with about 5 gallons of hose water. I rigged a couple of hoses with pump and garden hose fittings so that I can use pump #2 to recirculate the kettle water through the immersion chiller. Then I start dumping ice into the water kettle. I agitate the ice as others have said here. This keeps hot spots from forming when the chiller water returns to the ice water kettle.

It took me another 20 min to hit pitching temp. I went from boiling to 62f in a total of 45 min. Not bad for 10 gal of wort on a day when it was 93f in the garage. And the kicker is, I only had to run the hose water for the first 25 min.
 
Back
Top