A Poor-Planner's Dilemma: Bottle Early, Long Primary, or Secondary?

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

What to do?

  • A. Bottle Early

  • B. Leave in Primary

  • C. Put in Secondary

  • D. None of the above¡


Results are only viewable after voting.

blender747

Member
Joined
May 25, 2011
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Location
Santa Rosa
Yesterday I brewed a rendition of Janet's Brown Ale from Brewing Classic Styles, which is happily fermenting away as we speak. However, my wife just asked me: "Will we be able to bottle that brown ale before we go on our road trip?"

Touché.

So we're leaving on June 9th, 11 days after brewing, and we're not getting back until around June 25th (~27 days after brewing). Normally, I'd just leave it in the primary fermentation for about 2 or 3 weeks until I had time to bottle it. This time, however, I'll have to do something different. Here my options as I see it:

A. Bottle early at the risk of the brew not being full done/conditioned.
B. Leave it in the primary at the risk of off-flavors being produced (as I've read as being possible in many of the posts on HBT, even by those who recommend not bothering with primary fermentors)
C. Put it in a secondary fermentor before we leave until we get back at the risk of oxidizing it or exposing it to nasties.

Just based on Newton's First Law (and human nature), B sounds the easiest, but not if it's going to make weird beer. Any recommendations? Or is it D, none of the above?
 
You can leave it in primary. 1 month will not produce off flavors from leaving it on the yeast.
 
I would recommend C, since that's pretty much what I do anyway. There's really no risk of oxidation or nasties if you follow proper racking and sanitation procedures. The "primary only police" are going to jump on me but I do long secondaries for all of my beers regardless of my travel plans.

To tell you the truth, any of your options will be okay as long as fermentation is complete before you do any bottling. Option C is just the one I would do.
 
i say B. ive left beer in primary for 5 months and it was great.

dont bottle early, that could cause some explosion problems
 
I'm not on the "tremendously long primary" bandwagon at all. Long primary may not harm the beer, but anything over 2-3 weeks won't benefit the beer and you may not get autolysis but sometimes some other issue come into play, depending on temperature.

I'd either bottle it if it's done and fairly clear, or rack. If I had to absolutely choose one, I'd rack to the bright tank.
 
The "primary only police" are going to jump on me but I do long secondaries for all of my beers regardless of my travel plans.

I'm not on the "tremendously long primary" bandwagon at all.

I'm 2nd Lieutenant in the "primary only Army" :D

Mainly because of 1) laziness, and 2) timing.

1) Lazy - I just don't see a point to rack, unless I'm dry hopping or adding fruit

2) Timing - I like to keg/bottle as many batches as possible on one given day. So that may mean one batch has been in the primary 2 weeks, one batch may have been on dry hops for a week, and another batch may have been in the primary 8 weeks. But I like to bottle/keg all three in one day.

If I was in your boat, I'd do B or C (only C if you're sure it's reached FG).

:mug:
 
I'm with AZ for the same reasons.
I'd probably go with B. You're looking at a total of 4 weeks vs 3. It's really not that much longer, and I doubt you're going to get much, if any, off flavors based on time.

Most of the issues I heard of with long primaries are those with large scale fermenters. Certainly, if you were going to be gone for three months, then I'd go with C.

Oh, and if D is to keg it at the last minute and bring it along with a co2 tank, that could be a possible option.
 
I'd wait and evaluate right before you leave on your trip. If you get a solid fermentation going, it's possible the beer will be done and you could potentially bottle it right then. Otherwise, I'd leave it in primary. 27 days won't be a problem especially that Janet's brown is a fairly big/hoppy brown ale.
 
If you have the time I would put, as Yooper said, in a bright tank, at least then you are not worried about it. I can sit and you can bottle when you want to.

At the least, you can feel you dealt with it.:)
 
Last thing I'd do is bottle it if you're not absolutely sure it's done. I'd say leave in primary. I normally primary for 3 weeks, but I hear plenty of recommendations for 4 week primaries.
 
i say either b or c. thats not that long for an extende primary, which i have had good luck with recently. also the only reason i have been doing long primaries is because secondary is extra cleaning/work/worry. if you feel good about your racking procedures, then i don't feel like racking will hurt your beer at all. either way is perfectly acceptable IMO. i would be hesitant to bottle too soon. for one because of bombs, which can easily be ruled out. but also because i tend to think that if all the beer is "conditioned" together, its better. less sedement, less off flavors, less blah blah... it could just be me, but i feel that bottling before two weeks is normally too soon. i think either B or C will give you good results.
 
Thanks for all the input everyone!

I'm probably going to just leave it on the primary, since it seems that 4 weeks with a big, hoppy ale won't be a problem. But I like beerhappy's advice too: I'll definitely be evaluating it before I go. Who knows, if it's done, I might be able to bottle it so it's ready to drink when I get back!
 
Hey AZ_IPA, your pic looks like a sunset from around the Flagstaff area. Is that where you're at? My brother lives in Flagstaff and that's actually where we're headed on our road trip!
 
Back
Top