Beerswap III: Chad's Beers

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Chad

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
1,026
Reaction score
12
Location
Apex, NC
These will go out 11/19. There are two each of the American Amber and ginger Cream Ale and one of the all-grain American Amber.

Cap Scribble:
A = Apex Amber v1.0
C = Cornucopia Cream Ale
2 = Apex Amber v2.0

The ginger Cream Ale was bottled 11/9 so should be fully carbonated when you get it but still might be a little young. All three are bottle conditioned, so bottles A and C should be refrigerated at least over night to settle out after their arduous journey. Apex Amber v2.0 was just bottled 11/18 and will need at least three weeks at room temperature to reach proper carbonation. Please be patient. Based on the hydrometer samples the wait will be worth it. Thanks for playing guinea pig. I really appreciate it.

Chad
 
Apex Amber

Aroma:
Malt right up front. I can smell the crystal clearly. The hops are there, but not distinct.

Appearance:
Deep amber, no clarity. Great head! 1 inch on poor, half inch for half the glass. No lace on the way down though... might just be my glass was dirty.

Flavor:
Round, not too thin, not too thick. I like it. Hops are present, they outshine the malt. They aren't big, or citrusy, but bitter and graceful. Very nice.

Proximity to Style:
I think it needs more hops, maybe more bitterness and I'd love some more aroma. I don't think it's quite up to par with most ambers in this manner.
The color is right on, but should probably have a bit more clarity. The caramel notes are very true to the style.

Overall Impression:
A good, satisfying beer. But I would like to see more complexity in the hops aroma and maybe a hint more in the bitterness. The flavor hops are shining though.

34/50
 
Thanks for the kinds words, Chris. I agree with you about the hopping. What's weird is that Palmer (whose recipe I borrowed) and Beersmith both put this at 46 IBU or an IBU:OG ratio of .935. I certainly doesn't drink that way, does it?

I just went and checked my hop stash. The Willamettes that I used for aroma hopping are listed as 5.5% in Beersmith, but mine are at 3.8%. I realize that AA doesn't equal aroma, but it could be that these Willamette hops just aren't as potent/pungent/aromatic as they needed to be for this beer. Now I'm trying to remember if I adjusted for that with Apex Amber v2.0. Should be interesting to compare the two.

Take care,
Chad
 
Chad, I'm not gonna lie, I had a cold when I drank it. I took some medicine and made sure my nose had cleared up completely, but it still could've effected it. I'm gonna wait til I"m a bit healthier to drink v2.0
 
Cornucopia Cream Ale

Appearance:
Yellow, good color. Very hazy though, can't see through the glass. Nice head after the pour, sticks around for a minute and then leaves a nice lace on the glass.

Aroma:
Very little aroma, I am picking up some spice and maybe a little from the hops.

Flavor:
Simple, dry. A hint of spice in there, a little hops flavor comes through. Very lite on the tongue. Easy to drink, smooth, well carbonated.

Overall Impression:
The appearance was lacking, but that's about it. I like that the spicy notes are very very subtle which helps keep this beer in the cream ale category. A good all around beer.

40/50
 
Apex Amber

Pours a medium-dark amber color with a thick off-white head. Excellent lacing down my glass.

The nose is caramel malt. I don't get much hops.

Light caramel malt kicks the flavors off, but the flavoring hops are the star. I don't get much bitterness on the end.

Mouth feel is right on - not thin and slippery and perfect carbonation.

I guess if I were to suggest anything, it would be to add some more bitterness for a crisp finish. That said, the flavors were pleasant. It's quite a drinkable beer. I enjoyed it.:mug:
 
Aroma: More lemony than ginger, per se. Peppery spice also present. Mild hop bitterness blends into spice/citrus. (9/12)

Appearance: Noticeable CO2 discharge upon uncapping. Beer pours with white, 1-finger head. Tremendous CO2 nucleating from bottom of ordinary pint glass. I've really never seen anything like this. Perhaps my glass is just dirty! Hazy--faint orange to light copper in color. Head and lacing persistent throughout the consumption. (2/3)

Flavor: Earthy is the first thing that comes to mind...glad that you also mentioned it in the brew notes (which I didn't look at prior to sampling). Citrus not as present as the smell would indicate. Definitely grassy, but really not in a bad way. Tad on the dry side, with some mouth-puckering on the end palate. No hop bitterness detected, but subtle malts are a nice touch. Ginger faintly present in taste, but in no means dominant. (16/20)

Mouthfeel: Utterly delectable. Perfect for the style, I dare say. I am biased toward dry beers in aftertaste, and this reminds me of a belgian pale mouthfeel. Pleasing, and well rounded for my preferred tastes. (5/5)

Overall Impression: Other than the slight grassiness, this is a great beer. You are definitely on a great track! I would buy a sixer of this. (8/10)

40/50
 
For those who tried the Apex Amber version 2.0, did you find it strangely bland and one dimensional? I know I did. I don't get it. It's the same recipe and hop schedule as 1.0, but in an all grain version. However I didn't find the same maltiness or hop backbone as I did in version 1.0. In this case the extract+steeped grain version of this beer has more depth.

Comments?

Chad
 
I haven't yet because I planned to do this side by side with the 1.0.

Perhaps this will spur me to try it tonight! (as well as finish up all my other reviews!)
 
Cornucopia Cream Ale:

The pour is a nice pale yellow, crystal clear with ample white head. Some lacing was left down my glass.

The nose is light, as expected, with hints of malt and a little ripe fruit.

Flavor is light and pleasant. It's got a little spice and a touch of citrus on the finish. Body is perfect for the style - not chewy at all, but not thin and slippery either. Carbonation is right on the mark.

Well, I think I pounded it down in about three gulps:mug: . This is a light, crisp, refreshing brew that would be perfect to bust out for a mixed crowd. Nice job:)
 
Apex Amber v2.0

Aroma: Malt-centric, presence shifts to caramel/toffee aromas. No hops, alcohol, or off-flavours detected. (8/12)

Appearance: Remarkable pour. 1-finger pillow-fluffy head. Clarity is excellent. Ruby highlights when held up to the light. Definitive amber...I'd say you nailed this one on colour. (3/3)

Flavour: Communal balance between malt and hops. Well-placed for the style, in my opinion. Residual malt sweetness gives to the expected toffee/caramel undertones. No hop bitterness tasted, but slight astringency bitterness on the back palette. Tannins? (15/20)

Mouthfeel: Pleasantly mouth-coating. Not thin by any means. May actually be a little more coating than the style should call for. Astringency from the taste puckers the mouth, hence my thought on tannin extraction. I don't enjoy thin beers, so this suits me well. (3/5)

Overall: I don't think this is a bad beer by any means. The astringency is the only thing I can think of right now. I don't think it's thin or that the hops are off like you suggested. Well done. (7/10)

36/50
 
Apex Amber v1.0

Aroma: Bready; biscuity. Resounding malt sweetness evident, almost to a cloying effect.

Appearance: Pours amber clear until yeast decanted. Color spot-on, I believe. Huge fluffy head lasts, but shows signs of overcarbonation. I had to pour some into a British pint, then wait for the head to die down before pouring the rest, hence the yeast unsettling.

Flavour: First impression is thinness. There is a slight malt backbone, but no hop structure. Possibly even a hint of sourness? Tied in with the overcarbonation, it may have a hint of infection? I'm really not sure. This is the second of the two, and the first one wasn't like this at all. Definitely more body and balance. I'm not sure what to say.

Mouthfeel: Again, thin with some cheek-puckering sourness.

Overall: I'm going to go ahead and not score this one because of what I said above. I know that you have moved on to bigger things anyway, and I really enjoyed the AG version of this beer much better than the extract, despite your opinion posted above. I will try to find my notes from the first time I sampled this beer which was within the first couple of days upon reception back in Nov.
 
Back
Top