BrewDey
Well-Known Member
I currently have just bottled, and I don't mind it. But in my experience, and talking to those who keg, it seems like kegging and force-carbing have some benefits over bottle conditioning. I've heard the other argument as well-that bottle conditioning/carbing is the more authentic way to go.
When I taste beer at bottling, very often it tastes great, maybe a bit yeasty, and definitely flat-but still good. It seems that any off-flavors I get develop in the bottles-I've had 2 batches that I believe were infected, and a few others where I may get some goofy flavors-but they subside with time. It seems to follow that replicating the fermentation process via warm conditioning temp and priming sugar introduces more variables (and more chances for mishap) than kegging, crash cooling, and force-carbing.
Have you keggers experienced this? Do you get more consistent taste from kegs over bottles?
When I taste beer at bottling, very often it tastes great, maybe a bit yeasty, and definitely flat-but still good. It seems that any off-flavors I get develop in the bottles-I've had 2 batches that I believe were infected, and a few others where I may get some goofy flavors-but they subside with time. It seems to follow that replicating the fermentation process via warm conditioning temp and priming sugar introduces more variables (and more chances for mishap) than kegging, crash cooling, and force-carbing.
Have you keggers experienced this? Do you get more consistent taste from kegs over bottles?