Modified BIAB: hitting 85%+ efficiency

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

jaginger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
494
Reaction score
6
Location
Austin, TX
I've just started AG and after reading a bit decided to go BIAB for a little less equipment up front. I've been doing it a little bit modified though, since my 7.5 gallon kettle isn't quite large enough for a full 5.5 gallon BIAB batch.

So what I do is mash in the bag with 5.5 gallons (and the grain takes up the rest of the volume in the kettle.) After 60 mins I pull out the bag and dunk it in another bucket with 2.5 - gallons of water, then pour that water into the kettle as well.

My first 2 batches both produced over 85% efficiency. It would have been about 67% efficiency with the initial volume alone. The bag dunk got me another 18-20%. I am pretty happy with that, and it is really no trouble to do either.
 
that is EXACTLY what I've been doing. I, too, regularly get efficiencies in the 80s. Just curious though, what is your water to grain ratio in the initial mash dunk?
 
My 2 grain bills have been 12 and 13 lbs, and I went with 5.5 gallons just b/c that's about all i can fit in the kettle. So 22 qts/12 lbs is almost 2 qts/lb.

My OGs are getting too high though (i expected more like 70-75%), so I can drop down to more like 10-11 lbs of grain and then I'll be over 2 qts/lb.
 
Man, I can't wait to start AG brewing. I know that I want to start with BIAB since it is the easiest equipment upgrade from extract, and I keep reading great posts like this making me think it is a good idea. I just hope I don't forget all this information...

Is there any way to subscribe to threads? I see people talking about doing it, but I can't seem to find the button...
 
My 2 grain bills have been 12 and 13 lbs, and I went with 5.5 gallons just b/c that's about all i can fit in the kettle. So 22 qts/12 lbs is almost 2 qts/lb.

My OGs are getting too high though (i expected more like 70-75%), so I can drop down to more like 10-11 lbs of grain and then I'll be over 2 qts/lb.



yeah, im atleast 1.5 qt/lb in all my BIAB. The high ratio might be the cause of the good efficiency. People will neighsay about how a high ratio extracts all kinds of unwanted flavors from the grain, but my beer tastes good, thats all that matters.
 
Man, I can't wait to start AG brewing. I know that I want to start with BIAB since it is the easiest equipment upgrade from extract, and I keep reading great posts like this making me think it is a good idea. I just hope I don't forget all this information...

Is there any way to subscribe to threads? I see people talking about doing it, but I can't seem to find the button...

at the top of the thread there's a drop down menu that says thread tools. just click on that and then there's an option that says subscribe to thread :mug:
 
I can't wait to try my first AG BIAB. I want to do a SMaSH (so that I can focus on process) but I'm also thinking about making my Magic Hat #9.5 recipe to keep SWMBO into brewing.
 
lol this is how you are suppose to do it, so I don't think you modified anything
 
lol this is how you are suppose to do it, so I don't think you modified anything

Well i just didn't want to run afoul of the BIAB "purists" (how's that for an oxymoron) who would say it's not true BIAB because I did the sparge. I think the Aussie version is meant to be all in one vessel with full volume.
 
I do the same thing and I also end up with like 80%+ efficiency also. My first couple recipes were accidental imperials. I think it was also because of the fine crush that bmw gives their grains. I love it and I don't think I'm going to upgrade for a long time. I am currently an apartment dweller so it's great to save space and it's great for 3-5 gallon batches
 
Whats the biggest amount of grain you tried this with. I have done this for a couple small batches 10-13#s and was thinking about pushing the limits of my equipment with the DFH 90 min clone. I guess I am just curious to see if anybody has done any big beers with this method


I have a 7.5 Gallon pot as well

DFH 90Min Clone
5 gal
OG 1.088 FG 1.021
IBU 90 SRM 13 ABV 8.7%

16.5 lbs Pilsner Malt
1.66 amber malt

2.00 oz Amarillo 8% AA 90 - 0 minutes
.62 oz Simcoe 10% AA 90 - 0 minutes
.53 oz Warrior 15% AA 90 - 0 minutes
1.00 oz Amarillo Dry
.50 oz Simcoe Dry
.50 oz Warrior Dry
 
My biggest grain bill was 13 lbs. I think more is certainly possible if you reduce the initial water and do a bigger sparge.
 
So, I have a 9 gallon kettle. Would you reccomend doing the dunk for efficiency purposes, or would i have enough room in a 9 gallon kettle to do a standard gravity beer without using another vessel?
 
Well i just didn't want to run afoul of the BIAB "purists" (how's that for an oxymoron) who would say it's not true BIAB because I did the sparge. I think the Aussie version is meant to be all in one vessel with full volume.

Yes, as a BIAB purist, you have offended me to no end ;) j/k

Do what works for you. I get 80% with full volume no-sparge BIAB and I'm pretty happy with that.
 
God I love the biab with a sparge: BIABWAS.

Did a pale ale today. 14 qts strike on 9.5lbs of grain, 13 qt sparge. Hit 84% efficiency. I spent $10 on a 5gal cooler (did NO modifications to it) and a $1 paint strainer. No false-bottom, no vourlaufing and no worries.

I have no frickin' idea why some people agonize over 60% efficiency with fancy-ass all-grain setups. Get a paint-strainer and be done with it. I might move to a nicer setup one day, but BIABWAS was the only way I could get into all grain, and is serving me well right now.
 
For me, the reason I don't BIAB is because it's too simple. Brewing is a hobby, and I enjoy getting senselessly complicated sometimes. Also, the purist in me just won't allow it. It wouldn't be a bad idea for a smaller beer, but for the most part my grain bills are upwards of 13 pounds of grain for 5-gallon batches. Heavy!
 
Whats the biggest amount of grain you tried this with. I have done this for a couple small batches 10-13#s and was thinking about pushing the limits of my equipment with the DFH 90 min clone. I guess I am just curious to see if anybody has done any big beers with this method

We did a partigyle style brew session a bit ago. We called it collaborative brewing. Two mashes, 3 big beers and 2 bonus sour beers to boot. My rig was the BIAB. The "sparge" in my case was for half the second beer. I had 23# of grain in my 15 gallon kettle. Lifted, twisted, and drained for a bit on my own. No hoists, no hanging. Just my two scrawny arms. We were the "Partigyles gone wild" podcast on Basic Brewing Radio.

Here's my blog of it:
Collaborative Brew

BIAB is very flexible. It can be as simple or as complicated as you want to make it.
 
It wouldn't be a bad idea for a smaller beer, but for the most part my grain bills are upwards of 13 pounds of grain for 5-gallon batches.

I can theoretically make barley wine with my setup. (I just don't care for the stuff.)

I think 13lb would probably be a little heavy for a single paint strainer bag, but you should be able to simply double-up the bag by using one inside of another, and that would give you the bag strength to hold the grain.

However, any more than say, 12 lbs of grain mashed at a volume of 1.25qt/lb and you'd probably run out of room in the 5 gallon cooler.

At 85% efficiency (pretty normal for BIABWAS) I can use 12lbs of 2-Row and get a starting gravity of 1.075 for a 5 gallon batch. That's hardly what I would call a "smaller" beer.

Also, it seems like a lot of my recipes call for .5 to 1 lbs of other sugars (I am fond of panela and jaggery). 1lb of panela would boost my 12lb example up to 1.080. And if I really want to get heavy, just boiling/dropping the final volume down to 4 gal gets me to a whopping 1.100 gravity.
 
Back
Top