Irish Stout - How long is too long in fermenter?

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

akthor

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 23, 2010
Messages
2,070
Reaction score
186
Location
Litchfield and Brownton
So I made an Irish Stout it's been in primary for a month now.

We had a friends Thanksgiving Sunday. Basically a potluck with a Thanksgiving theme. It went so well we are going to do monthly "theme" dinners where everyone brings some food or drink for the "potluck".

Like Italian, French, German etc. We talked of doing an Irish one for March in honor of St. Patrick's day.

So since I happened to have made an Irish Stout a month ago I thought it quite lucky.

My thought now is that I just keep it in primary till Feb 1st or so then keg and carb it for the dinner.

That would be about 3 months in primary. I am pretty sure this is OK and actually desirable for a stout but i just wanted to double check.
 
3 months should be fine. Or just keg what you have now and brew another one?
 
I am just curious as to why you think it's desirable to leave it the fermentor for a total of four months. I am not saying it will harm the beer. I am just wondering what you hope to gain by doing this? Four months in the primary seems a bit excessive. Two or three weeks should be plenty of time for a stout to ferment out and be ready to drink.
If it's just a matter of saving it I understand, but I still think racking it to a keg for storage would be a better option.
 
I know people have said they've done it, but I wouldn't. A couple of reasons- one is I can't see why you'd want to keep it on the trub that long. I'd either put it in secondary, keg it, or bottle it. I can't see any benefit to risking oxidation (if there is headspace- I always have headspace in primary) or risking autolysis.

Sure, if it was necessary because you were deployed or something, but why not rack it to the keg and age it that way? It just seems really silly to even consider leaving that long on purpose.
 
Just so it's not taking up a keg when I don't really want to drink it till march.

But, now it's "taking up" a fermenter, and the beer won't be better for it.

It's your beer, you can do whatever you want. I just always want to make the best beer I can, and I can see no benefit to keeping in the primary. I'd at least put it in secondary, and top up with some co2 to prevent a risk of oxidation.
 
Sorry if I'm hijacking the thread, but is there a difference between the aging process when you bottle vs. kegging? I've heard people say that beer tastes better if left in the bottle a few weeks or months.. Same goes for kegs, then?
 
Sorry if I'm hijacking the thread, but is there a difference between the aging process when you bottle vs. kegging? I've heard people say that beer tastes better if left in the bottle a few weeks or months.. Same goes for kegs, then?

Yes, if it's a beer that can benefit from some aging. Beer ages faster at room temperature, so for a beer that needs some time keeping it at room temperature (bottle or keg, or even a carboy) helps it along. Once it's aged, it's good to keep it at cellar (or fridge) temps to keep it from getting too aged.
 
Back
Top