Blending of Sours

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

sherm1016

Member
Joined
May 12, 2010
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Location
Milwaukee
I'm looking to start brewing some sour beers, and I was thinking of doing a Flanders Red based on Jamil's recipe (but skipping the CA Ale yeast).

It seems that blending it a key component, but it is not quite clear to me how long to age and the ratios you should blend. My thought was to blend one beer aged two years (brewed now) and another aged one year (brewed a year from now) at a ratio of 1 to 1.

Does this seem reasonable? Does anyone have thoughts on what would be a better approach?

Given the long term nature of these beers, I would like to have a plan in mind before I start.

Thanks!
 
blending isnt really straight forward like that, its needs to be done to taste

you have to taste each batch and decide what qualities of each you want in the final product, its not something that comes easy and takes quite a bit of time to get right and to be able to do quickly, but like everything in brewing practice makes you better

also, for a flanders red, youll want a very sour beer with some acetic edge that you can blend with a malty brown beer to get the sweet/sour twang that something like rodenbach has

more sours always is a good thing, if you brew a beer at the same time but split it it can have different characteristics, and there are even things that you can do to enhance this variation such as feeding, and/or maltodextrin additions to various portions
 
Thanks for the feedback. I think at this point, I am going to move forward with brewing a red ale, and go from there. I was already thinking about splitting the sour red and varying the aging process between the two.

I like your red recipe I saw in another thread

6.5 Vienna
1.0 Aromatic
1.0 Carahell
1.0 Caravienna
1.0 Wheat
0.5 Special B

I guess we'll see where it goes from here.

Thanks again
 
When blending, how does one bottle? Blend to taste, then mix in correct proportions in a secondary, then wait for gravity to stabilize again?
 
If the gravity of both beers is relatively low, I wouldn't think it would move too much after blending. I was even thinking you could just do your final blend in the bottling bucket.

Then again, I have *zero* experience brewing or blend sours.
 
depends on what your goal is

I like to blend in young beer or very malty beer to balance the vinous acidity of some of my older batches, to prevent bottle bombs when I do this I ......

1 - Determine proportions of sour to malty beer
2 - rack needed amount of sour beer to another fermentor
3 - fine and cold crash sour beer for a couple days (usually turns into a week + cuz Im lazy)
4 - rack one more time and add campden
5 - next day blend with clean malty beer, add correct priming sugar and bottle

going this route Ive got beers that ive bottled 1yr+ ago that are stable - the campden should take out any bugs that are present in the sour and the cold crashing and fining help in this process
 
Is the goal of the finings, cold crashing, and campden to eliminate all of the bugs? I assume this goal is twofold: no bottle bombs and the beer won't continue to sour in the bottle.

Also, will the yeast from the malty beer be enough to carb the bottles, or would you add fresh yeast?

Thanks
 
What if I'm blending something like a geuze, where I wouldn't want dead critters? My understanding is that lambic blenders use the young lambic to carbonate the blend.
I've got a few funky batches going, and I'd like to bottle live beers if possible, but I'm wary about an unforeseen drop of three gravity points turning my closet into an munitions cache.
 
to sherm - yes that is the goal, and you could add fresh yeast it wouldnt hurt, i tend not to but I wait a long time before drinking anyway

Maskednegator - true thats how traditional gueuze is made, but I never know how low any given batch will finish so Ive been a bit leary of relying on the unknown amount of fermentables in the younger beer to give me the desired level of carbonation i want

generally when i want a gueuze I will blend various batches let it sit another month or two (sometimes renewed fermentation is evident) and then I will bottle with priming sugar albeit to a bit lower level than i would otherwise
 
Blending to achieve certain flavor/aroma/mouthfeel is challenging enough! However, it seems to me that blending various aged beers to get the correct level of final carbonation without adding priming sugar is what makes gueuze blending really difficult.

I recently opened a bottle of Cantillon three year old unblended lambic. It was an amazing beer, but almost complete flat. (Maybe a bit petillent right when it was poured.) It didn't occur to any of us drinking that night that this would be the case until we poured it, but it makes sense in retrospect since lambic/gueuze normally gets its carbonation from younger beer in the blend. (I'll also add that this beer was perfect without carbonation.)
 
Blending to achieve certain flavor/aroma/mouthfeel is challenging enough! However, it seems to me that blending various aged beers to get the correct level of final carbonation without adding priming sugar is what makes gueuze blending really difficult.

I recently opened a bottle of Cantillon three year old unblended lambic. It was an amazing beer, but almost complete flat. (Maybe a bit petillent right when it was poured.) It didn't occur to any of us drinking that night that this would be the case until we poured it, but it makes sense in retrospect since lambic/gueuze normally gets its carbonation from younger beer in the blend. (I'll also add that this beer was perfect without carbonation.)

i think you drank the Cantillon Bruocsella (1900) Grand Cru which is supposed to be completely still; no carbonation at all. from cantillon: "After maturing for three years in oakwood barrels, it looks more like wine and its fine taste and flavours nearly make one forget that the Grand Cru Bruocsella Cantillon is a beer. This old lambic is bottled without any addition."

for blending and bottling if you use all champagne style bottles i'm confident you'll never have a bottle bomb incident. the cork or cap are liable to be compromised before your bottle blows. the gravity of your younger beer will be a major concern if you don't fine & Kmeta the old/character beer since the young less attenuated beer is giving ammunition for that lambrenade.
 
Back
Top