flaminpi3
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2009
- Messages
- 124
- Reaction score
- 2
I was wondering how enlightening a conclusion can be that divides the world up into these two categories.
"The World: butter eaters and the rest."
"The President: clueless or a tool?"
"The CIA: criminals or traitors?"
There seems to be a "forced choice" fallacy in all of these, somehow.....
Me: retiree or brewer; you decide.
How does engineer vs non-engineer qualify as a forced choice fallacy? In your president and cia example, both of the choices are negative and practically synonymous, whereas eng./non eng. and butter/non-butter are two legitimate opposites with no value judgments assigned. You might have a point if the original question was 'What's your occupation, mechanical engineer or industrial engineer?' or 'What's your occupation, hooker or whore?' Those questions have underlying assumptions.