carapils VS flaked barley

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Jul 16, 2006
Messages
7,671
Reaction score
1,708
Location
Redding Ca
So I just (ya like 4 hours ago) off the phone w/ a grain supplier and 3 pro brewers. We were talking about carapills and all 3 of the "PRO" brewers wanted to know why I would want to use the EXPENCIVE carapills instead of the CHEEP flaked barley? Both add body and head retention. So what gives? I never gave it much thought.
Input? suggestions? Help? I find it hard to argue w/ the pros. But their not ALWAYS right...Are they?
 
I never use Carapils anymore and only use Flaked barley when I want a big creamy head, like in a stout or hefeweizen. The two are different. Carapils leaves body without much flavor and has unfermentables, while the flaked barley has more proteins.

I'm assuming this is for your commercial endeavor. If you have control over your mash temperature, then I don't really see the need for carapils. If your hot liquor tank is going to keep the mash temp pretty much set (like I know some commercial brewers do, say around 150) then Carapils may be the answer. The brewers do have a point in flaked barley being much cheaper.
 
Well not only being cheaper but I think they have a good argument in saying they accomplish the same task. Yes I too think the proteins may be a contributing factor, how much is the question? I do, and have always thought I could accomplish at least body in my beers w/ mash temp. Head retention is another story.
I am going to have to do some side by side action on this one. I am thinking 2 brews 1 w/ carapills and one w/ flaked barley, brewed back to back on the same day. Simple beer maybe a Blonde or something like that.
Yes I am thinking of commercial application (always) flaked barley is like .60 per# and carapills is like .75 per# (bulk buys obviously)
Cheers
JJ
 
Carapils roxx man! I use like 2 pounds in every brew. My friends tell me it's great stuff.
Naw, you don't know what you're talking about. Carpils is for hack brewers that couldn't control mash temps if their life depended on it. Beers with carapils blow chunks.
 
Those "pro" brewers don't know what they're talking about. Those wussies are too worried about the bottom line. You need to make beer that stays true to the craft, not the pocket book.
 
If the protein thing is an issue with flaked barley then it might be better suited for darker beers.

I'm gonna say the carapils might be better if you are making something like a pilsner. The clarity is good a other flavors are minimal. I believe carapils adds some sweetness. I think you need to use quite a bit to notice this though.

Another thought. Pound for pound which is more effective for head rention? It might be a $$$ thing.

You might ask Briess...
Briess Carapils. 1.5° L. Carapils is a dextrin malt. Its main function is to add foam stability, body, and palate fullness to otherwise thin worts. Dextrin malt also significantly enhances head retention. Although it appears darker than pale malt, it has a clear, glassy endosperm and does not contribute significantly to beer color or flavor. Must be mashed with other diastatic grains.
Grain Adjuncts

Grain adjuncts require mashing. Flaked adjuncts are pre-gelatinized, require no pre-cooking, and can be added directly to the mash. Torrefied grains are also pre-gelatinized and serve much the same function as flakes. They need to be crushed before adding to the mash.


Flaked Barley. Lends a rich grainy taste and increased head retention, creaminess, and body. Can make up to 40% of grist.
Briess Links

Carapils - Briess Malt & Ingredients Co.: Carapils® Malt

Flaked Barley & Adjuncts - Briess Malt & Ingredients Co.: Adjuncts
 
By all means use the flaked barley. A bit of wheat malt will have an excellent impact on foam retention also. Haze only becomes a problem when used in excess of, say, 5% of the total grist. Besides, if you're filtering - which I presume will happen in a commercial setting - haze will be easily surmounted.

Many UK brewers use a proportion of flaked grains or wheat malt in light beers like Ordinary Bitter for just that purpose. And if they can use it in unfiltered real ales, there is no reason you can't use it in your light-beer grists to the same effect.

Cheers,

Bob
 
Input? suggestions? Help? I find it hard to argue w/ the pros. But their not ALWAYS right...Are they?

Was the essence of their point price alone or did they have other considerations?

What's your goal with the carapils, are you trying to troubleshoot issues?
 
I am going to have to do some side by side action on this one. I am thinking 2 brews 1 w/ carapills and one w/ flaked barley, brewed back to back on the same day. Simple beer maybe a Blonde or something like that.
That's a fantastic idea - I'd love to hear how they turn out. :mug:
 
By all means use the flaked barley. A bit of wheat malt will have an excellent impact on foam retention also. Haze only becomes a problem when used in excess of, say, 5% of the total grist. Besides, if you're filtering - which I presume will happen in a commercial setting - haze will be easily surmounted.

Many UK brewers use a proportion of flaked grains or wheat malt in light beers like Ordinary Bitter for just that purpose. And if they can use it in unfiltered real ales, there is no reason you can't use it in your light-beer grists to the same effect.

Cheers,

Bob

This was exactly what they were talking about too.

Was the essence of their point price alone or did they have other considerations?

What's your goal with the carapils, are you trying to troubleshoot issues?

Price was one of the big issues. .25 a # is not a huge issue at the 10 gallon batch size but for them 600+ gallon mark it's a different story. I personally never gave it much thought I was just wondering if any of you had. That’s all, nope no issues.
 
Mainly because Larry said it best and truthfully over at ProBrewer - if you start with a wort much higher than 10P (1.040 OG), if you suffer from foam problems, 99% of the time it's due to either serving-process issues or brewing-process issues.

Most of the time, with modern, fully-modified malts, foam problems can be overcome by increasing mash temperature. Over time, if you brew the same recipe over and over, you can tweak the one variable to where you think it solves (or doesn't solve) the problem. Of course, you don't want to overdo it; it won't do taking your Blonde Ale mouthfeel into Oatmeal Stout territory in order to correct a foam problem.

Deleting the protein rest if you're brewing with anything other than true Czech or German Pils malt will immediately improve the issue.

When I wrote about the UK brewers earlier, I should remind you that most UK Bitters have a significant proportion of sugars in the grist. Adding protein-rich grains such as flaked barley and wheat - malted or unmalted - increases the proportion of essential proteins and amino acids available in the wort for yeast metabolism and enhancement of vollmundigkeit. An all-malt wort shouldn't need such additions.

Cheers,

Bob
 
OK so I did a side by side. I brewed a pale ale. 1 w/ 1.5# of flaked barley and the other w/ the same Carapills. Flaked barley @ $.45 or carapills @ $.85. I am pleased to say that the flaked barley is the winner in this one. Better head retention. Better body and over all a better beer. Was it that noticeable? Yep it was. The Carapills looked darker in color. The flaked barley was just as clear, but the head... WOW what a difference!

So there it is "IMHO"
JJ
 
Sweet! Great to know.

I've standardized on 5% flaked wheat. Same effect, also cheap, since I buy in bulk and I already use a lot of flaked wheat for Wits.

I've switched to regular red wheat malt over carapils. I like the lacing that it provides.
 
Good read Denny thanks for sharing. Are you saying you don't use any at all? How is that working out for you? Just wondering.
JJ

I use carapils when I want to adjust the body of the beer, not for head retention. AAMOF, that's true of all the stuff that people might use to increase foam. I use them for flavor and body purposes, not for foam.
 
I used to use cara-pils all the time for body/head retention when the recipe needed it. A few brews ago, I tried flaked barley just to compare and I'll never go back. I'm getting thicker, richer, creamier head that lasts longer and way better lacing down the glass. I only use 1/4 lb for 5 gallons. No haze issues at all in my pale ales.

I haven't tried mashing a bit higher, but that'll be my next project after I use up all my flakes and cara-pils.
 
I just used a pound of flaked barley today in an APA I brewed up. I had to abandon aerating with my aquarium pump and SS airstone since the wort was foaming like a rabid dog. I did the five minutes of carboy rocking/swirling instead since that produces a higher DO concentration anyway. 6 hours later the foam was still there! I'll be curious to see if this persists all the way through to bottle conditioning but so far I've never had a carapils beer do that.
 
OK so I did a side by side. I brewed a pale ale. 1 w/ 1.5# of flaked barley and the other w/ the same Carapills. Flaked barley @ $.45 or carapills @ $.85. I am pleased to say that the flaked barley is the winner in this one. Better head retention. Better body and over all a better beer. Was it that noticeable? Yep it was. The Carapills looked darker in color. The flaked barley was just as clear, but the head... WOW what a difference!

So there it is "IMHO"
JJ

To re-hash this one a little - did you notice a significant difference in flavor? I'm concerned doing a 1:1 substitution might impart a different flavor than you'd get with cara-pils. Especially with what Schlenkerla stated from Briess that:

Flaked Barley. Lends a rich grainy taste and increased head retention, creaminess, and body. Can make up to 40% of grist.

Also, how did the two compare ABV or FG -wise?
 
Uhhh Apples and Oranges? Chew on a handful of each. Then make an extract batch with 2 lbs of each. Then add 1 lbs of each to 10 lbs of 6-row. Just look at how they are grown, harvested, malted (or not) and stored. There is little similarity of process, or product. To be generous, the chemical analysis is strikingly similar. There, I have done my part to stir up the controversy.
 
I hate to re-open an old thread but did these ever get answered?

To re-hash this one a little -
1). Did you notice a significant difference in flavor? I'm concerned doing a 1:1 substitution might impart a different flavor than you'd get with cara-pils.

2). How did the two compare ABV or FG -wise?
 
Digging this one up from the dead. I am interested to see if anyone has any more input in this over the last couple years
 
Digging this one up from the dead. I am interested to see if anyone has any more input in this over the last couple years

Flaked barley will add a creamy mouthfeel in higher quantities (~1 lb). I'm not sure if carapils will as well because I've never used it in such high quantities.

I thought the main reason not to use flaked barley is that it adds a haze. I use carapils on every beer I make. Before I did, my beers used to suffer from poor head retention. Now that I do, I get big fluffy heads that take a while to go away. Medium infusion, 4-8 oz carapils, carb to 2 vol has served me well.
 
Old thread, but thought I would use this rather than start a new one. I have really been enjoying the flaked barley lately. Used in small amounts (~5%), it creates a nice creamy head and creates no problems with clarity (when a standard clarifying agent like whirlfloc is used). My beers have been picturesque lately, so I've been including it in essentially every brew day.
 
I am half way through a hefeweisen with about 5% flaked barley. The first bottles had a wonderful fluffy head, but the results appear diminished as the beer ages.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top