Mash thickness as a pH adjustment

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

BackAlley

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
289
Reaction score
22
Hi,

Am planning an upcoming pilsner. I have pretty low alkalinity water (37ppm) and it looks like I may have to add some acid when I brew.

If I use a thinner mash, according to the spreadsheet, I still may have to acidify but probably have to use less acid. I'm assuming this is because I'm adding more bicarbonate ions with the larger volume of mash water.

My question is, why don't I read about using mash thickness as one of the knobs to adjust pH?
 
Hi,

Am planning an upcoming pilsner. I have pretty low alkalinity water (37ppm) and it looks like I may have to add some acid when I brew.

If I use a thinner mash, according to the spreadsheet, I still may have to acidify but probably have to use less acid. I'm assuming this is because I'm adding more bicarbonate ions with the larger volume of mash water.

My question is, why don't I read about using mash thickness as one of the knobs to adjust pH?

Actually, forget everything I wrote, I goofed the spreadsheet up....again.
 
It depends on the spreadsheet you are using (i.e. on how accurately it models bicarbonate chemistry). The bicarbonate (and carbonate) if any contribute to the proton deficit of the water. The lower the proton deficit of the water the fewer protons are needed from other mash materials and the lower the pH will be. If you have a water with total proton deficit of 100 mEq and mash grains + acid with a total proton deficit of -100 mEq at some pH things balance at that pH and it is the mash pH. If you now increase the water quantity by 10% you are adding 10% more proton deficit for the water (you now have 110). Proton deficit decreases as pH increases. The pH will thus shift higher reducing the water proton deficit to something less than +110 and decreasing the proton deficit of the acid + grains to something less than -100 (e.g. + 105 and - 105 so again you have balance). Thus adding water that is alkaline increases mash pH. If the alkalinity is low the shift will be small. There is also buffer 'dilution effect'. Without going into detail it should be clear that a pH 5.4 mash diluted infinitely with pure water will have a pH of 7.
 
Hi,

Am planning an upcoming pilsner. I have pretty low alkalinity water (37ppm) and it looks like I may have to add some acid when I brew.

If I use a thinner mash, according to the spreadsheet, I still may have to acidify but probably have to use less acid. I'm assuming this is because I'm adding more bicarbonate ions with the larger volume of mash water.

My question is, why don't I read about using mash thickness as one of the knobs to adjust pH?

I have found with my pilsners and light Belgians that replacing 1/4 pound of pilsner malt with 1/4 pound acidulated malt works wonders. I do start with RO water.
 
Great topic, I've been starting to kick the idea around in my head as well. Whenever I use a thinner mash, I notice my PH go down seemingly proportionally. Today I mashed a 2.5 SRM Pils pretty thin, used very little gypsum for calcium and hit PH almost too low (5.1). My water alkalinity resembles the OP's.

The wort was beautiful. It is said that wort profile will change based on mash consistency (I don't have any science behind it myself), but the proof will be in the end product. If the beer turns out (I suspect it will), I will use this technique as a rule.
 
Great topic, I've been starting to kick the idea around in my head as well. Whenever I use a thinner mash, I notice my PH go down seemingly proportionally. Today I mashed a 2.5 SRM Pils pretty thin, used very little gypsum for calcium and hit PH almost too low (5.1). My water alkalinity resembles the OP's.

The wort was beautiful. It is said that wort profile will change based on mash consistency (I don't have any science behind it myself), but the proof will be in the end product. If the beer turns out (I suspect it will), I will use this technique as a rule.

So you are seeing exactly the opposite of what should scientifically happening? That doesn't make sense...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top