Ss Brewing Technologies Giveaway!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Brewing Software > Tinseth or Rager or Garetz for IBU calculations?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-02-2007, 12:47 AM   #1
BrianP
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BrianP's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dexter, MI, Michigan
Posts: 1,159
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default Tinseth or Rager or Garetz for IBU calculations?

Which method do you use for calculating IBUs? I plan on doing full boils - is Tinseth the best for full 5-gal boils?


Thanks in advance,
Brian

__________________
BrianP is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-02-2007, 12:53 AM   #2
Yuri_Rage
Gritty.
HBT_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Yuri_Rage's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Southwest
Posts: 13,916
Liked 607 Times on 376 Posts
Likes Given: 54

Default

It's been a while since I read up on the different algorithms, but I think Tinseth is generally accepted as the most accurate among homebrewers. That's the one I settled on after reading as much info as I could find.

__________________
Homebrewed Blog..........YouTube Channel .......... Shirts, posters, etc
Yuri_Rage is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-02-2007, 01:00 AM   #3
Beerrific
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Beerrific's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,600
Liked 45 Times on 37 Posts
Likes Given: 9

Default

I have heard peoplw say Tinseth was best for full boils too.

Of course they are all estimates, so it is most important to be consistent. Everyone's equipment and water will extract bitterness differently too. On Basic Brewing Radio they send out some beers to a chemistry lab and had the IBU analysis done. Tinseth and Rager were usually pretty close...averaging them usually got you closer.

__________________
Beerrific is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-02-2007, 03:20 AM   #4
BrianP
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BrianP's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dexter, MI, Michigan
Posts: 1,159
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Thanks for the input guys. I'm leaning toward Tinseth. Looking at his website, it looks like there is some good science behind the numbers.

By the way, Yuri - I admire your work - quite handy with the welding and metal work.

Regards,
Brian

__________________
BrianP is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-02-2007, 03:27 PM   #5
brewt00l
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 3,739
Liked 9 Times on 9 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beerrific
Of course they are all estimates, so it is most important to be consistent.

That's the key IMHO...once you know what to expect from the method you choose, you accurately compose your recipes to get your levels right where you want.
__________________
brewt00l is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply



Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tinseth Formula and Gravity jescholler Brew Science 5 10-21-2009 12:14 PM
Is the Rager IBU formula real-world-accurate? carbon111 General Beer Discussion 15 08-26-2009 08:36 PM
Tinseth and Continual Hopping MMW Brew Science 4 06-11-2009 08:33 PM
BeerTools Tinseth Implementation mod_critical Brewing Software 0 08-19-2008 06:01 AM
Tinseth IBU Formula LS_Grimmy All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 4 02-13-2008 11:34 PM