 |
|
06-06-2007, 12:51 AM
|
#11
|
|
Nothin' like a lil 60 grit...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Southwest
Posts: 13,415
Liked 421 Times on 260 Posts Likes Given: 43
|
Here's a comparison pic. A poured bottle of DFH 60 is on the right, and mine's on the left - still just a touch cloudy, but it's begun clearing nicely since being chilled over a week ago. Dare I say that, tasted side by side, the DFH actually tastes malty?! The first time I had DFH 60, I swore it was pure hop syrup. I have a completely different perspective now. I think I've outdone a commercial brewery at their own game!!!
 |
|
|
|
|
06-06-2007, 12:10 PM
|
#12
|
|
Frau Administrator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upper Michigan
Posts: 52,329
Liked 2091 Times on 1603 Posts Likes Given: 110
|
Wow- nice pic. I'm glad it turned out so well for you- I LOVE the recipe and the hops. Thanks for sharing the picture.
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006
|
|
|
06-08-2007, 09:13 PM
|
#13
|
|
...My Junk is Ugly...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 11,875
Liked 349 Times on 220 Posts Likes Given: 70
|
It's a beautiful thing. I've yet to brew an IPA but I'm on the cusp. Thanks to both of you for the recipe(s).
Yuri, do you think the 002 yeast gave you a bit maltier profile (being a lower attenuating yeast)?
|
|
|
06-08-2007, 10:23 PM
|
#14
|
|
Nothin' like a lil 60 grit...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Southwest
Posts: 13,415
Liked 421 Times on 260 Posts Likes Given: 43
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BierMuncher
Yuri, do you think the 002 yeast gave you a bit maltier profile (being a lower attenuating yeast)?
|
Not at all. It attenuated REALLY WELL! It's doubtful, but perhaps the PacMan wasn't completely dead after all.
I wouldn't hesitate at all to use WLP002 in most beers that require a clean flavor profile from the yeast. I've had great success with it.
|
|
|
07-02-2007, 05:25 PM
|
#15
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 283
Liked 7 Times on 1 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Yuri_Rage
Here's a comparison pic. A poured bottle of DFH 60 is on the right, and mine's on the left - still just a touch cloudy, but it's begun clearing nicely since being chilled over a week ago. Dare I say that, tasted side by side, the DFH actually tastes malty?! The first time I had DFH 60, I swore it was pure hop syrup. I have a completely different perspective now. I think I've outdone a commercial brewery at their own game!!!

|
Wow, amazing. The only difference I detect is the clarity.
Great job both of you for refining this for the rest of us!
I will have to try this one in the near future. 
__________________
"I would kill everyone in this room for a drop of sweet beer." ~ Homer Simpson
|
|
|
07-02-2007, 05:40 PM
|
#16
|
|
Formerly Bike N Brew
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Evanston IL
Posts: 1,864
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Yuri_Rage
Check out my continuous hopping technique:
Dogfish Head ain't got nothin' on me!
|
Yuri, I'm disappointed...where's the real-time IBU monitor controlling the automated hop conveyor
Beer sounds awesome. Yet another one I have to put on the never-ending list of things to brew...
__________________
No signature required.
|
|
|
07-20-2007, 09:36 PM
|
#17
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,597
Liked 32 Times on 26 Posts Likes Given: 9
|
I am making this beer this weekend, using 3oz biscuit and 30oz crystal 40L instead of the 6oz amber.
So, mash at 153F with 1.25 quarts/lb? What have others been succesful with?
Thanks!
Yooper Chick--this is two in a row for me copying your recipes, FatTire now this
|
|
|
07-20-2007, 10:21 PM
|
#18
|
|
Frau Administrator
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upper Michigan
Posts: 52,329
Liked 2091 Times on 1603 Posts Likes Given: 110
|
Ha- I'm going to start charging you a copyright fee! No, you're changing them and making them your own which is really cool.
I mashed at 154 the first time, I think, and it attenuated way too well (using pacman yeast). I usually mash at 1.25 quarts/pound. The second time, I missed my target temp and mashed at 152. Usually nottingham yeast, it got down to 1.006! This beer probably tastes best with a higher fg, so next time I'll try a less attenuative yeast and mash higher. I'd think a fg of 1.012-1.016 would be best.
Let us know how this works out!
__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006
|
|
|
08-09-2007, 08:26 PM
|
#19
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 59
|
Anyone have or produce an extract recipe?
Dying to try to make this beer
|
|
|
08-26-2007, 01:53 AM
|
#20
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,597
Liked 32 Times on 26 Posts Likes Given: 9
|
Finally got around to making this beer last week. Took a sample today so I thought I would report. OG was 1.069 and I am currently at 1.017. That might go down a few more points, I used WLP001 and that (75%) is right in the middle of its range. I did a single infusion at 153F, I think that was just right, thanks.
Tastes good, I can't wait to get this bottled. The color unfortunately is way to light. I should have added a darker crystal, oh well. I will post back in a couple weeks when it is bottled.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|