 |
|
07-03-2012, 08:01 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: St. Charles, Missouri
Posts: 373
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
Wort chiller
|
|
Ok I'm planning on making a new wort chiller.
Here is my question is there any advantage to 1/2 tubing versus 3/8" ?
25 ft vs 50ft
|
|
|
07-03-2012, 08:02 PM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Evanston, Illinois
Posts: 1,168
Liked 9 Times on 9 Posts
|
What kind of chiller are you going for? If it's a counterflow chiller, 3/8" and 25' should do fine. If it's immersion, go 50'.
__________________
On Tap: Surly Furious, Belgian Trippel, Da Yoopers Pale Ale, Chocolate Lager, Wee too Heavy (barrel aged Scottish), Belgian Barrel Aged Barleywine, Simcoe Pale Ale, Galaxy/Nelson Sauvin IIPA, Broken foot Pilsner, Da Yooper's Oatmeal Stout
Bourbon Barrel
Kegged:
Fermenting Gumballhead with Nelson Sauvin
on Deck: Dogfish Head Indian Brown Clone, Ocktoberfast Ale, Rodenbach Clone.
|
|
|
07-03-2012, 08:11 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: St. Charles, Missouri
Posts: 373
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
Immersion Althought I'm told that counter flow is better
Will1/2 inch give more
Surface for cooling versus 3/8 or is that a waste ?
|
|
|
07-03-2012, 08:33 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Glenview, IL
Posts: 4,099
Liked 249 Times on 231 Posts Likes Given: 89
|
They both have advantages and disadvantages. Immersion require nothing more than a water source. CFC will require either gravity or a pump, a valve on the kettle to drain and the ability to plug up although they tend to chill faster. I personally went from 30 minutes to 15 minutes in making the change to CFC.
1/2" tubing will give you more contact surface so chilling will be faster with an immersion. 1/2" tubing is more difficult to and rigid to coil though. depending on the size of your kettle and height will determine whether you should go 50' or 25'.
|
|
|
07-04-2012, 01:08 AM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: St. Charles, Missouri
Posts: 373
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
Ok how do these chillers (immersion and CFC) compare to a plate chiller ?
I was talking to a friend of mine tonight who works for Pepsi and he suggested a plate chiller stuck in ice but that takes me back to the expense of buying ice all the time
|
|
|
07-04-2012, 01:48 PM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Glenview, IL
Posts: 4,099
Liked 249 Times on 231 Posts Likes Given: 89
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dpalme
Ok how do these chillers (immersion and CFC) compare to a plate chiller ?
I was talking to a friend of mine tonight who works for Pepsi and he suggested a plate chiller stuck in ice but that takes me back to the expense of buying ice all the time
|
Plate chillers will do the same thing but they require pumps to circulate the wort, they will not work with gravity like a CFC, IMO the chill time difference is not worth the expense of the hardware required and some people complain they get plugged up with break material.
__________________
Nothing Left to do but smile and drink beer.....
The Commune Brewing Company-Perfecting the "art" of beer since 2010
|
|
|
07-04-2012, 03:44 PM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kasson, Minnesota
Posts: 148
Liked 6 Times on 6 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
I made a 50ft 1/2in immersion chiller and have had no problems in cooling 6 gallons of near boiling wort down to 70F in 10-15min using tap water here in S. Minnesota.
My neighbors each use a counterflow chiller (25ft 3/8in copper) and their cooling times are longer (15-25min) and are fiddling with gravity and water pressure to assure a steady flow and temp control.
I like my system and they like theirs, just the personal taste of the user. But I do agree with duboman. Use 1/2in for immersion and 3/8in for counterflow for best results.
Plate chillers are nice and convenient but do require a pump to use effectively.
Choose a style that fits your brewing setup and is convenient for you, but for me a 50ft immersion chiller is easier on my old back to lift than a 6 gal brewpot of hot wort...
Redbeard5289
|
|
|
07-04-2012, 06:33 PM
|
#8
|
|
BrewSteel Brew Stands
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 1,706
Liked 31 Times on 27 Posts Likes Given: 49
|
Question Red: are your neighbors recirculating their wort? If so, they are defeating the whole purpose of a CFC or plate chiller. They are heating their wort back up.
__________________
Brewright. All Rights Reserved. We reserve the right to brew and to help you brew. To protect the brew and defend the brew. To make the brew and drink the brew.
BrewSteel.com
BrewSteel on Facebook
|
|
|
07-06-2012, 07:42 PM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redbeard5289
My neighbors ... are fiddling with gravity and water pressure to assure a steady flow and temp control.
Redbeard5289
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OneHoppyGuy
Question Red: are your neighbors recirculating their wort?
|
I'd say no, they're not recirculating since they're using gravity.
If MC Escher were a homebrewer, I bet he recirc'ed using gravity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterfall_%28M._C._Escher%29 
|
|
|
07-07-2012, 12:16 AM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,037
Liked 24 Times on 23 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OneHoppyGuy
Question Red: are your neighbors recirculating their wort? If so, they are defeating the whole purpose of a CFC or plate chiller. They are heating their wort back up.
|
Not necessarily... Some use a CFC and recirc to get the entire batch temp dropped fast to most utilize late or flameout hop editions.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by D_Struct
I would've made a crayon schematic if I thought this was going to hang people up.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|