Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > When should i take my first reading?




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2012, 03:20 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Kittery, Maine
Posts: 496
Liked 21 Times on 20 Posts

Default When should i take my first reading?

It's day 5 soon to be 6 my IPA went into primary it still bubbles once every min. When should I start taking my readings? I'm racking into a secondary once my fg is met. (dry hopping whole leaf)


jonnyp1980 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-12-2012, 03:29 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 174
Default

Technically, you could take one now. Everybody has different opinions but the Idea is to get three readings that show no change.

I am still new to this so I let mine sit in the primary for at least 2-3 weeks before bothering it.


1KD1 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-12-2012, 03:37 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: E.MEADOW, NEW YORK
Posts: 330
Liked 5 Times on 4 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

You can dry hop right in the primary and avoid racking. You can take a reading now, but it will be more crucial when you bottle or keg. Like the previous poster said, consistent readings over several days.
__________________
PIGMO'S BREWPUB


Primary: RIS
Bottled:
Drinking: Caribou Slobber, Cream Ale, The Innkeeper, Sweet Stout, IPA, American Pale Ale, English Bitter
PIGMAN is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-12-2012, 03:43 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Kittery, Maine
Posts: 496
Liked 21 Times on 20 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PIGMAN
You can dry hop right in the primary and avoid racking. You can take a reading now, but it will be more crucial when you bottle or keg. Like the previous poster said, consistent readings over several days.
I'm bottling and was hoping that syphoning would cut the excess of sediment down to a minimum. Thoughts.
jonnyp1980 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-12-2012, 03:46 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 98
Liked 3 Times on 2 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

I transferred to 2nd on my 1st dry-hop, and lost a ton of volume between the 2 trubs. It did end up nice and clear, but don't think I ended up with much less sediment by transferring it. Next time I will just save myself the time & effort and do what PigMan said.

Also depends on how good you are at siphoning. I did it because I was new and figured that would give me a 2nd shot at not cramming my auto siphon into my trub.
hnsfeigel is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-12-2012, 03:52 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: E.MEADOW, NEW YORK
Posts: 330
Liked 5 Times on 4 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnyp1980 View Post
I'm bottling and was hoping that syphoning would cut the excess of sediment down to a minimum. Thoughts.
The sediment will settle into a cake in primary as well. By leaving it in primary, you avoid potential oxidation and sanitation issues. On the other hand, plenty of people rack to secondary with good results. I just never saw the need to.
__________________
PIGMO'S BREWPUB


Primary: RIS
Bottled:
Drinking: Caribou Slobber, Cream Ale, The Innkeeper, Sweet Stout, IPA, American Pale Ale, English Bitter
PIGMAN is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-12-2012, 03:53 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 4 reviews
 
midfielder5's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,217
Liked 25 Times on 24 Posts
Likes Given: 18

Default

Don't move it to a bright tank (2ndary vessel) until it is at or near FG; it is still actively fermenting by your description-- so you are wasting beer and time by checking gravity now. Come back in 3-5 days and look to move it then.
edit: if you don't want to transfer, then it needs to sit for 2-3 weeks to get all yeast to drop out. ymmv
midfielder5 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-12-2012, 03:54 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
wherestheyeast's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 227
Liked 10 Times on 8 Posts
Likes Given: 34

Default

My second beer was an IPA that I racked to secondary after 2 1/2 weeks. I dry hopped in secondary for about 10 days. Its been bottle conditioning for 3+ weeks and has a strong soapy flavor. My LHBS (which also runs a nice brew pub) says that the soap flavor was due to a combination of soft water and length of time dry hopping. The brewer that I talked to suggested 3-4 days tops for dry hop and using gypsum in the boil.
wherestheyeast is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-12-2012, 03:58 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Kittery, Maine
Posts: 496
Liked 21 Times on 20 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PIGMAN

The sediment will settle into a cake in primary as well. By leaving it in primary, you avoid potential oxidation and sanitation issues. On the other hand, plenty of people rack to secondary with good results. I just never saw the need to.
Oxidizing was one of my worries. But if you have to open and take a reading x 2 or 3 and people have no issues I can't see why syphoning into a secondary would harm it. Unless you agitate it during the process??
jonnyp1980 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 04-12-2012, 04:05 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Kittery, Maine
Posts: 496
Liked 21 Times on 20 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PIGMAN

The sediment will settle into a cake in primary as well. By leaving it in primary, you avoid potential oxidation and sanitation issues. On the other hand, plenty of people rack to secondary with good results. I just never saw the need to.
Makes sense. Tried gathering enough info and majority states secondary for additions and a clearer beer. I from my own conclusions that syphoning from primary to secondary equals less sediment then to bottling would cut down even more. Also. My FG. Do I take before sugar or after?


jonnyp1980 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools
Display Modes




FOLLOW US ON