Advertise Here
Main · BrewSpace · Recipes · Wiki · Groups · Clubs · Gallery · Reviews · Video · Blogs · Store

Ultra Portable Kits - $74.95, Kegconnection.comNew Product! Cool Brewing Fermentation Cooler$69.99 Brand new 2.5 Gallon Keg Pre-Order
Go Back   Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-20-2006, 09:14 PM   #1
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 266
Default Sugar or glucose

Hi

I'm just about to start my firs brew and thought I would use a kit to begin with, just so I got to know the brewig process.

When advising me on the kits for sale in my local homebrew shop, the assistant advised I could use sugar, or I could use glucose. He advised glucose was dearer, but was definately a better choice as far as results are concerned. I just wondered what everyones opinion on this was and whether they'd tried it?

Also, some of the better (more expensive!) kits he showed me didn't require sugar at all. He said that they used more malt (he may have said double the malt) and that they yielded much better results.

I would appreciate anyones opinion on what the assistant said and would be interested to see if you all agreed with him.

Cheers


Adam's Apples is offline Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2006, 11:02 PM   #2
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hearts's Delight, Newfoundland
Posts: 4,087
Default

I have found malt to be the best. I have had some good results with glucose. The sugar gave my brew that "homebrew" taste, which every now and then I do like.

If you want the best brew go for the malt.
__________________
How do you BBQ an elephant....first you get your elephant....
boo boo is offline Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2006, 01:10 AM   #3
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 115
Default

What u can try if u want to be cheap, since glucose (or dextrose as other people may prefer to call it) seems to be quite a bit more expensive that plain table sugar (sucrose), you can boil the sucrose with some citric acid which will convert the sucrose to invert sugar. This boiling with acid hydrolises - breaks up - the glycosidic bond between the two sugar molecules (glucose and fructose) that make up sucrose. So in effect you have something that is just as good as glucose for less.

On the other hand as Boo boo said, malt probably is the better option if u like that real malty taste, just depends on whether u want some cheaper ok tasting beer or slightly more expensive but yummier beer - although it may depend on ur own taste too.


__________________
Primary: Empty - awaiting a second go at Cheesefood's VCCA

Secondary #1:My wash for distilling, yum yum.

Secondary #2: Empty

Bottled:my Belgian-like Wit, Mac's Lager (nz kit), James Squire Amber Ale clone, Cheesefood's Vanilla Caramel Cream Ale, Munton's wheat and possibly some of my cider hidden somewhere - it seems to pop up somtimes, lol I guess I should have labelled them.
JeanLucD is offline Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High Malt Glucose SFBEER Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 2 10-22-2009 10:49 PM
High malt glucose in starter? Fingers Recipes/Ingredients 1 11-09-2008 04:14 AM
Glucose Or Spray Malt brian kay Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 3 08-20-2008 10:21 PM
hi-malt glucose Jason Halter General Techniques 4 02-24-2007 07:01 PM





Contact Us - Top - Privacy - All times are GMT. The time now is 08:28 AM.
Copyright © Group Builder, Inc - All Rights Reserved
Craft Beer & Brewery Forum