New Giveaway - Wort Monster Conical Fermenter!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > small pot, lots of grain




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-21-2012, 05:21 PM   #1
Spencecore24
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Glendale, Ca
Posts: 143
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default small pot, lots of grain

I was thinking about it. When you make pasta you are supposed to use at least a gallon of water to cook it in. With that in mind would using a larger vessel for grain get you a higher efficiency? I am assuming it would be but i want to hear the thoughts from you people. It seems like if you are putting 8 lbs. of grain in a 4 gallon pot you would not have the same efficiency as you would putting that same 8 lbs. of grain in a 6 gallon pot.

Cheers



__________________
Spencecore24 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-21-2012, 05:25 PM   #2
TopherM
Vinz Clortho - the Keymaster of Gozer the Gozerian
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TopherM's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 3,588
Liked 350 Times on 280 Posts
Likes Given: 18

Default

?????

I'm confused by this logic. The size of the pot is pretty irrelevant if all other variables are equal, except for maybe the different pots' boil off rates.

Do you mean to be asking a question about the starting water volumes?

Sorry, just not following here....why would the amount of the pot that has nothing in it matter to efficiency if the water volumes in both the 4 gallon and 6 gallon are the same?



__________________

Primary #1 - Cherry Wood Smoked Cranberry Cider
Primary #2 - Baltic Porter
Primary #3 - Schwartzbier
Secondary #1 - Downtown Flanders Brown
Keg #1 - Smoked Vidalia Onion Beer
Keg #2 - EMPTY!
Keg #3 - EMPTY!
Bottled - NONE!

TopherM is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-21-2012, 05:29 PM   #3
Spencecore24
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Glendale, Ca
Posts: 143
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

if you are mashing 8 lbs. of grain in 3.5 gallons of water in a 4 gallon vessel wont everything be (pardon the pun) mashed together? If you do the same procedure in a larger vessel doesnt the grain have more room to move around or have the ability to take on more water?

__________________
Spencecore24 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-21-2012, 05:32 PM   #4
duboman
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Glenview, IL
Posts: 5,810
Liked 429 Times on 402 Posts
Likes Given: 199

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spencecore24
I was thinking about it. When you make pasta you are supposed to use at least a gallon of water to cook it in. With that in mind would using a larger vessel for grain get you a higher efficiency? I am assuming it would be but i want to hear the thoughts from you people. It seems like if you are putting 8 lbs. of grain in a 4 gallon pot you would not have the same efficiency as you would putting that same 8 lbs. of grain in a 6 gallon pot.

Cheers
The two cannot really be compared. With pasta you are really only providing enough boiled water to rehydrate the pasta. With grains you are mashing to achieve extraction. In addition the grain absorbs water causing it to swell. The general rule is anywhere from .75-1.25 gallons per lb depending on the grain bill, mash infusion, and what you are trying to achieve

For efficiency there is a lot more involved than just the volume of water being used. I will say that IME too large a mash tun will reduce efficiency if there is too much dead space. This makes it harder to maintain the proper temperature. Too small and you won't be able to accommodate the water volume required to mash the grain bill.
__________________
Nothing Left to do but smile and drink beer.....

The Commune Brewing Company-Perfecting the "art" of beer since 2010
duboman is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-21-2012, 05:37 PM   #5
Johnnyhitch1
Crawl Space Brewing
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 27 reviews
 
Johnnyhitch1's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SiX-ThReE-OnE, NY
Posts: 1,799
Liked 183 Times on 155 Posts
Likes Given: 2958

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spencecore24 View Post
if you are mashing 8 lbs. of grain in 3.5 gallons of water in a 4 gallon vessel wont everything be (pardon the pun) mashed together? If you do the same procedure in a larger vessel doesnt the grain have more room to move around or have the ability to take on more water?
1 pound of bricks weighs as much as a pound of feathers right?
8 lbs of grain in 3.5 gallons of water is.....8 lbs of grain in 3.5 gallons of water
..
..
..
like topher said the size of the pot don't matter
__________________
^~~ "Like" it, Ill Give you beer ~~^
(({Brewing for the Movement Within}))

Primary: Kicking Cans DIPA, ECY20 Golden sour.
Kegged: All out Riot DIPA, NZ Brett 2014
Aging: Oud bruin w/ ECY02, Brett Oatmeal Stout, All out Brett.
BOTTLES:

Cider: Grapfelwine, Apfelwine, Cranfelwine, Applejack
Beer: NZ Brett (BD:9/16/12)
Mead: Blueberry-lemon, Raspberry-Lime, Habenero, POM, Traditional.
Cellar: Maple Whiskey Barrel Stout, ST Pumking Clone
Johnnyhitch1 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-21-2012, 05:38 PM   #6
Spencecore24
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Glendale, Ca
Posts: 143
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

I suppose you are correct. Im just trying to think of all the variables to increase efficiency. Some say they have no efficiency problem with the BIAB method but i keep coming short.

__________________
Spencecore24 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-21-2012, 05:45 PM   #7
Golddiggie
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 12,047
Liked 467 Times on 414 Posts
Likes Given: 266

Default

I normally mash with 1.25-1.5 quarts (water) per pound of milled grain. The thickness of the mash will determine how much space I'll need in the mash tun. You can have lower efficiency when mashing more grain in a mash tun compared with mashing less grain. Im talking about between a 14# grist and a 30# grist. Of course it also depends on the shape and size of the mash tun.

This is something you need to figure out early on in all grain brewing. That way you make sure you have the correct size mash tun for most/all of your batches (at the size into primary). It's also where good software really helps. It will let you factor in things like the dead space under the false bottom.



__________________
Hopping Tango Brewery

跟猴子比丟屎 ・ Gun HOE-tze bee DIO-se

On Tap: Caramel Ale, Mocha Porter II, MO SMaSH IPA
Waiting/Carbonating: 12.5% Wee Honey II, 8.9% Old Ale, English Brown Ale, Lickah ESB, Mocha Porter II
Fermenting
K1:
K2: Epic mead
K3: TripSix
On Deck: Caramel Ale
Aging:mead
Mead [bottled]:Oaked Wildflower Traditional, Mocha Madness, Blackberry Melomel, maple wine


...the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
Golddiggie is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First all grain! Lots of questions. hungryhippo Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 7 09-11-2011 06:18 AM
Small-batch all-grain brewing hybridspecies725 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 1 02-02-2010 06:26 PM
Beginning partial grain brew. Lots of questions here. cafeviking Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 3 10-12-2008 06:15 PM
Lots of Questions, first all grain - O' Flannagain Stout OregonNative Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 7 09-19-2008 08:31 PM
Small grain bill = low alcohol..? beergears Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 4 12-03-2007 01:36 AM



Newest Threads