New Giveaway - Wort Monster Conical Fermenter!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > smack pack yeast




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-21-2007, 09:04 PM   #1
sublimebrew
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: stuck in iowa
Posts: 22
Default smack pack yeast

Do i need to make a starter for a smack pack yeast, or can I smack it, let it swell for a day or two, then brew and pitch. it is my first time with the packs. thanks & brew on...



__________________
sublimebrew is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-21-2007, 09:06 PM   #2
DeathBrewer
Maniacally Malty
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
DeathBrewer's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 21,826
Liked 199 Times on 110 Posts

Default

i would advise always making a starter, but no...you don't have to. if your beer is under 1.050 OG than you should be good to go letting it swell a day or even less. Still, you SHOULD always make a starter IMO



__________________
Easy Partial Mash Brewing - Stovetop All-Grain Brewing

"Death is always with us." - Brewpastor

Quote:
DIAICYLF
We will remember...
DeathBrewer is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-21-2007, 10:36 PM   #3
mountainrev
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Near Vail, Colorado
Posts: 67
Default

If you're going to make a starter, then don't waste the money on the upgrade to a smack pack. The whole idea with the smack pack is just smacking and pitching.

__________________

"Give beer to those who are perishing." -- Proverbs 31:6


  • In Primary:
  • In Secondary: Bavarian Dunkel Lager
  • In Secondary: Pyramid ESB Clone
  • In Bottles: Cherry Stout
mountainrev is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-21-2007, 10:55 PM   #4
Denny's Evil Concoctions
Grande Megalomaniac
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Denny's Evil Concoctions's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: West Kelowna BC, Canada
Posts: 7,764
Liked 49 Times on 41 Posts

Default

Not with wyeast propogator packs. You have to whack then make a starter. Acyivator packs can just be pitched once swollen.

__________________

I may not be an expert, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express........ 6 months ago.

http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f39/dennys-quick-dirty-faq-153729/#post1766281

http://groups.homebrewtalk.com/Taproom_Facebook_Repository

Denny's Evil Concoctions is online now
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-21-2007, 11:07 PM   #5
Evan!
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Evan!'s Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 11,901
Liked 62 Times on 56 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainrev
If you're going to make a starter, then don't waste the money on the upgrade to a smack pack. The whole idea with the smack pack is just smacking and pitching.
I disagree.

The idea behind a smack pack, in reality, is to find out prior to pitching whether the yeast is viable or not. Wyeast may claim that you can pitch it directly, but with that tiny amount of wort & yeast nutrient in the smackpack, you're not getting anywhere near the cell count you need.

Check out Mr. Malty's pitching calculator.

Plus, alot of places only carry the smack packs, and not the propegators. In fact, just now, I checked a couple places, and neither had anything but the 125ml XL's.
__________________
MOSS HOLLOW BREWING CO.
Aristocratic Ales, Lascivious Lagers


.planned:
•Scottish 80/- •Sweet Stout •Roggenbier
.primary | bright:
98: Moss Hollow Soured '09 72: Oude Kriek 99: B-Weisse 102: Brett'd BDSA 104: Feat of Strength Helles Bock 105: Merkin Brown
.on tap | kegged:
XX: Moss Hollow Springs Sparkling Water 95: Gott Mit Uns German Pils 91b: Brown Willie's Oaked Abbey Ale 103: Merkin Stout
98: Yorkshire Special 100: Maple Porter 89: Cidre Saison 101: Steffiweizen '09 (#3)
Evan! is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-21-2007, 11:08 PM   #6
kaptain_karma
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
kaptain_karma's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 306
Default

You don't need to make a starter, but starters are super kickin'

__________________
kaptain_karma is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-21-2007, 11:14 PM   #7
Evan!
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Evan!'s Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 11,901
Liked 62 Times on 56 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

...and I speak from experience here. Before I started the practice of always making huge 2L starters, I had several smack packs swell, then dump a freakin HUGE lag time in my lap. One even took 3 days to start. So, like I said, Wyeast may claim you can pitch it directly, but my experience is that you're asking for long lag times if you go that route.

__________________
MOSS HOLLOW BREWING CO.
Aristocratic Ales, Lascivious Lagers


.planned:
•Scottish 80/- •Sweet Stout •Roggenbier
.primary | bright:
98: Moss Hollow Soured '09 72: Oude Kriek 99: B-Weisse 102: Brett'd BDSA 104: Feat of Strength Helles Bock 105: Merkin Brown
.on tap | kegged:
XX: Moss Hollow Springs Sparkling Water 95: Gott Mit Uns German Pils 91b: Brown Willie's Oaked Abbey Ale 103: Merkin Stout
98: Yorkshire Special 100: Maple Porter 89: Cidre Saison 101: Steffiweizen '09 (#3)
Evan! is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-21-2007, 11:25 PM   #8
Dark_Ale
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Liberty, Texas
Posts: 647
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

With good aeration I have had smack packs on 1.050 brews and lower take off withen 8 hours. I would not worry, although I tend to brew to batches now, about a week apart and use my yeast cake for the second brew. But thats just me, I dont like taking the extra chance of contamination by making a starter. No matter what though, your end result will be beer. Good luck

__________________
Dark_Ale is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-22-2007, 01:06 PM   #9
98EXL
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
98EXL's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,283
Liked 12 Times on 12 Posts

Default

I dunno, I've had great luck with the smack packs. Although I am making my first starter tonight for tomorrow night, so we'll see.

Do you really need to sanitize the outside of the smack pack when you rip it open?

__________________

I'm back!!!

98EXL is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-22-2007, 01:22 PM   #10
CBBaron
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CBBaron's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 2,787
Liked 6 Times on 4 Posts

Default

First isn't both the Propagator and XL packs, smack packs?
Popping the pack on an XL Wyeast package the night before should be sufficient but making a 1-2 liter starter a day earlier will ensure plenty of yeast cells. If you are going to do a starter a Propagator package is large enough and will save you some money.
mrmalty.com is a great site for references on yeast but you can make great beer with much less yeast than is recommended on that site.

Craig



__________________
CBBaron is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why does the yeast from my smack pack look curdled? SenorWanderer General Beer Discussion 8 06-12-2010 11:58 PM
yeast bank from smack pack mtags Fermentation & Yeast 2 09-25-2009 05:36 PM
Bad yeast smack pack? friday Recipes/Ingredients 4 05-30-2009 01:54 AM
Yeast cake and smack pack mix? DD2000GT General Techniques 5 10-09-2008 01:07 PM
Premature Smack of yeast pack craprocker Recipes/Ingredients 2 05-13-2008 11:12 PM