 |
|
04-28-2010, 05:58 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 66
|
Secondary Fermentation for Stout
|
|
Is it necessary to transfer a stout for secondary fermentation or am I wasting my time? I have been told that with a stout it really isn't necessary and from everything I have read there is no true consensus.
|
|
|
04-28-2010, 06:06 PM
|
#2
|
|
Mustang2Minivan<4mos
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hamden, CT
Posts: 7,783
Liked 709 Times on 688 Posts Likes Given: 210
|
I don't believe it's necessary. The only reason I've read that you need to transfer to secondary would be to aid in clearing the beer (no point with a stout) or to dry hop (if you're dry hopping a stout, you are a true visionary my friend).
__________________
Fermenting: Nothing
Drinking: APA, My Own Personal Helles
On Deck: American Wheat
|
|
|
04-28-2010, 06:11 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Springfield, MA
Posts: 1,399
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBZSTL
Is it necessary to transfer a stout for secondary fermentation or am I wasting my time? I have been told that with a stout it really isn't necessary and from everything I have read there is no true consensus.
|
If given enough time for the yeast to drop out there is no need. If you wanted to cold crash, add fruit, chocolate or coffee it can be useful.
__________________
"Just remember Scooty Puff Jr. sucks!"....Philip J. Fry
|
|
|
04-28-2010, 08:58 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 591
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
<- Firm believer in one beer one vessel for fermentation .
But this is one of those 6 in one hand half dozen in the other arguments 
__________________
Hazard Brewing
|
|
|
04-28-2010, 09:41 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: , WI
Posts: 1,221
Liked 18 Times on 17 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
It doesn't really matter much either way for a stout. Actually, this is the case with most ales. The benefits you gain from a secondary are mostly cosmetic. I wouldn't bother with the secondary unless you are planning to add some additional ingredients after primary fermentation or you are planning to wait a while before you are going to bottle it. I typically use a secondary, but only because I never know when I am going to get around to bottling.
|
|
|
04-29-2010, 12:05 AM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: WI
Posts: 2,957
Liked 128 Times on 113 Posts Likes Given: 6
|
I would definitely secondary a stout. I am NOT doubting your skills but rather mine...I know I always get some trub when I siphon but in a beer I could probably not see through well it would probably pretty easy to do. I do not like to chew my beer... 
__________________
“I'm not drunk, I'm from Wisconsin.”
We have been out drinking your state since 1848!
|
|
|
04-29-2010, 12:12 AM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 224
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
Racking to secondary is usually more of a pipeline necessity for me, I need the bucket for bottling or something else so I rack to free it up. heh.
__________________
Nerd:Beer is science!
Hippy:Beer is art!
Me:Beer is GOOD!
|
|
|
04-29-2010, 01:17 AM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Worcester
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyO
I don't believe it's necessary. The only reason I've read that you need to transfer to secondary would be to aid in clearing the beer (no point with a stout) or to dry hop (if you're dry hopping a stout, you are a true visionary my friend).
|
+1 on no secondary. After 3 weeks in the primary, you should have little issue racking to a bottling bucket (or keg) and leaving the trub behind.
__________________
Coming Soon: Saison, Amarillo SMaSH, Oktoberfest
Primary1: APA
Primary2: Belgian Wit
Keg 1: Empty =(
Keg 2: Blonde Ale
|
|
|
04-29-2010, 02:07 AM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Shelby Twp, MI
Posts: 1,751
Liked 39 Times on 35 Posts Likes Given: 38
|
I agree there is no need for a secondary. I personally would leave a stout in the primary for 4 weeks, then bottle. If you use an autosiphon to transfer to the bottling bucket, you should have little to no trub transferred. If you let the bottling bucket sit for 30 minutes after mixing in the priming sugar, then you should get no trub in the bottle. Now if you are kegging, all the more reason to skip the secondary.
__________________
I love the sound of an airlock bubbling in the morning. It sounds like.....VICTORY.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TxBrew
It's now degenerating into nu uh and uh huhs and it no longer serves a point.
|
|
|
|
04-29-2010, 11:00 PM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 111
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
very interesting... if i knew this before! i would have use the glass carboy as fermenter instead of using the plastic bucket.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|