 |
|
03-06-2010, 03:08 PM
|
#1
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: san diego
Posts: 7
|
Ready for Secondary??
|
|
Hello all, I've been enjoying my 1st batch of homebrew while keeping an eye on my fermenting 2nd batch and had a question.
Beer style is what the recipe calls a dark strong Belgian ale.
OG was 1.070
White Labs Abbey Ale Yeast WLP530
Fermenter bucket sitting in water at about 66 F
Fermentation started between 30-40 hours after pitching.
Lots of percolation activity for about 3 days before slowing down
It's now been 2 weeks in the primary and still showing signs of fermentation. CO2 is still bubbling out of airlock but much slower than before. Not that I'm worried about my beer. I know those yeasties had a lot of work to do and need time to do their thing. My question is should I wait till the bubbling stops before racking to a secondary? I'm willing to wait, but I'm ready to start my 3rd batch to get a "pipeline" going and want my primary back.
|
|
|
03-06-2010, 03:12 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: desert
Posts: 79
|
Have you taken a hydro reading? I like to leave my beer on the yeast for at least 3 weeks. Just my 2 cents but I would wait a bit longer.
|
|
|
03-06-2010, 06:50 PM
|
#3
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: san diego
Posts: 7
|
Haven't touched it since brew day. I want it to stop fermenting before I do.
Has anyone else used this kind of yeast? Is it just slow at that temp with the heavier wort?
I'll wait longer.
|
|
|
03-06-2010, 07:10 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posts: 609
|
Or..... forget the secondary and brew your next beer now.
Nothing against folks who like using secondary, but since I stopped using it I would never look back. its just so much easier.
Unless you are doing a BIG GRAVITY beer (barleywine, Imperial Stout etc), save your stress and drop the secondary altogether.
Just my 2 Cents
|
|
|
03-06-2010, 07:45 PM
|
#5
|
|
I love making Beer
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 4,005
|
1.070 Strong Belgian ale is a pretty big beer that could stand some secondary time to improve. Take a reading and if it is where it should be, rack that baby. Bubbling will not tell you if it's finished, only a hydrometer will.
__________________
Batch 1 Brewing
The American Revolution would never have happened with gun control.
|
|
|
03-06-2010, 09:50 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 306
|
I don't have any personal experience with that yeast, but it's not uncommon to have about 3 days of really active fermentation, then a slow-down. I'd take a hydro reading if you're curious.
And I'm with the Duke, I've been leaving my beer alone for about 3 weeks, then bottling or kegging. No messing with secondaries!
|
|
|
03-06-2010, 09:59 PM
|
#7
|
|
Simpleton
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Zebulon, North Carolina
Posts: 587
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bockman
Hello all, I've been enjoying my 1st batch of homebrew while keeping an eye on my fermenting 2nd batch and had a question.
Beer style is what the recipe calls a dark strong Belgian ale.
OG was 1.070
White Labs Abbey Ale Yeast WLP530
Fermenter bucket sitting in water at about 66 F
Fermentation started between 30-40 hours after pitching.
Lots of percolation activity for about 3 days before slowing down
It's now been 2 weeks in the primary and still showing signs of fermentation. CO2 is still bubbling out of airlock but much slower than before. Not that I'm worried about my beer. I know those yeasties had a lot of work to do and need time to do their thing. My question is should I wait till the bubbling stops before racking to a secondary? I'm willing to wait, but I'm ready to start my 3rd batch to get a "pipeline" going and want my primary back.
|
A strong belgian is your 2nd brew?!?!?!?!!??! They clank when you walk don't they?
__________________
"Real men drink their freakin' yeast starters...."
|
|
|
03-07-2010, 05:52 AM
|
#8
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: san diego
Posts: 7
|
Thanks for the responses. I'm gonna wait a few more days.
Jonesy & JR,
I've read some of the discussions about secondaries and decided to give it a try it in the interest of clearing up the beer. I want to share my brews with friends and don't want to have to give them a lesson about how to pour a beer without also pouring out the yeast at the bottom of the bottle.
As for the strong Belgian being my 2nd batch, I guess I just want to brew the kinds of beers that I love most. I'm trying to work up to a brewing a dopplebock. As my handle may suggest, that's my favorite and is also my goal.
Cheers!
|
|
|
03-07-2010, 01:03 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 33
|
I was debating a secondary on my (pending) second batch, which is an IPA. From what I'm gathering, there's no major benefit to that other than clearing it up a bit? My brews are only shared with a couple of guys who have done some homebrewing also, so they know and don't care about a bit of sediment.
I like the idea of starting a 3rd in the other fermenter...
Bottom line, though, is clarity / sediment reduction the main benefit of secondary?
|
|
|
03-07-2010, 02:45 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 306
|
You're right, the main reason (usually) for a secondary is for letting the beer clear a bit. If you're drinking it yourself or sharing it with homebrew friends who don't care, then skip it.
Some use a secondary for dry hopping or oaking. Personally, I dry hop in the primary between days 14 and 21.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|