Happy HolidaySs Giveaway - Winners Re-Re-Re-Drawn - 24 hours to Claim!

Get your HBT Growlers, Shirts and Membership before the Rush!


Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > Disappearing Gravity
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-26-2012, 08:57 PM   #1
Moonraker
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 38
Default Disappearing Gravity

Mash today gave me 6.25 gallons at 1.058 (1.041 @ 145F). Before pitching I had 5.0 gallons at 1.064 (1.062 @ 80F). I would have expected to get 1.072 (i.e. 58 x 6.25 / 5).

Is there a rational explanation for where the sugar is going? I'm as careful with the hydrometer as I can be, and getting the wort mixed well before sampling.

__________________
Moonraker is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-26-2012, 09:04 PM   #2
neosapien
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 714
Liked 140 Times on 99 Posts
Likes Given: 395

Default

my bet is that the sugar never went anywhere. it was never there to begin with. from 1.058 -> 1.064 was just a matter of your boil-off. the fact that you expected to hit 1.072 means your efficiency was just not as high as expected. look to things like mash time/temp, grain mill size, etc. to improve that number. Also, as much as you mix the wort after you top off, it's still possible to find a non-homogenous region in it, so that may account for it as well.

__________________
neosapien is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-26-2012, 09:12 PM   #3
Moonraker
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 38
Default

The 1.058 is after the mash, so mash time, grain mill size etc not a factor after that point. I had 77% mash efficiency , which I'm happy enough with.

I did forget to factor in loss to hop sludge, which I measured at a little over half a quart. Even calling that a whole quart would mean I should have gotten 1.069 (54 * 6.25 / 5.25). I leave nothing in the kettle...

__________________
Moonraker is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-26-2012, 09:26 PM   #4
Moonraker
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neosapien
my bet is that the sugar never went anywhere. it was never there to begin with. from 1.058 -> 1.064 was just a matter of your boil-off. the fact that you expected to hit 1.072 means your efficiency was just not as high as expected. look to things like mash time/temp, grain mill size, etc. to improve that number. Also, as much as you mix the wort after you top off, it's still possible to find a non-homogenous region in it, so that may account for it as well.
Sorry, I should have at least said thankyou for the response - was in a hurry to get out the door and to the pub.
__________________
Moonraker is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-26-2012, 09:29 PM   #5
ShinyBuddha
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 347
Liked 17 Times on 17 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

So you dump the cold break and the vegetative material from the hops into the fermenter? Why don't you use hop bags? Just curious. I make 6.5 gallon batches to end up with 5 gallon batches in the keg/bottles. I plan on loosing 1 gallon to the brew kettle (trub & cold break) and another .5 gallons to the fermenter (yeast & whatever else settles out).

__________________
ShinyBuddha is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-26-2012, 09:42 PM   #6
Moonraker
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShinyBuddha
So you dump the cold break and the vegetative material from the hops into the fermenter? Why don't you use hop bags? Just curious. I make 6.5 gallon batches to end up with 5 gallon batches in the keg/bottles. I plan on loosing 1 gallon to the brew kettle (trub & cold break) and another .5 gallons to the fermenter (yeast & whatever else settles out).
I read somewhere here that you get more flavour out of the hops if you let them roam free. I used to use hop bags and still got a fair amount of sludge. Now I just pour everything through muslin into a bottling bucket before racking to a carboy. I figure anything the muslin doesn't catch will end up in the trub at the bottom of the carboy after three weeks and be left behind before bottling.
__________________
Moonraker is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-26-2012, 09:43 PM   #7
neosapien
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 714
Liked 140 Times on 99 Posts
Likes Given: 395

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonraker View Post
Sorry, I should have at least said thankyou for the response - was in a hurry to get out the door and to the pub.
THAT is a worthy cause
__________________
neosapien is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-26-2012, 10:24 PM   #8
Yooper
Ale's What Cures You!
HBT_ADMIN.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Yooper's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upper Michigan
Posts: 62,774
Liked 4914 Times on 3563 Posts
Likes Given: 989

Default

Remember that any reading with wort above about 90 degrees is worthless- even with conversion tables/correction software it is notoriously accurate. So I would say the sample at 145 degrees is simply wrong.

Next time, cool the sample in a water/ice bath in a pitcher to under 90 degrees and then take the reading. At that point, it can be temperature corrected to an accurate reading.

__________________
Broken Leg Brewery
Giving beer a leg to stand on since 2006

Find me on facebook: Lorena Evans
But I'm pretty boring so don't expect much!
https://www.facebook.com/lorena.t.evans
Yooper is online now
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-26-2012, 10:58 PM   #9
Moonraker
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooper View Post
Remember that any reading with wort above about 90 degrees is worthless- even with conversion tables/correction software it is notoriously accurate. So I would say the sample at 145 degrees is simply wrong.

Next time, cool the sample in a water/ice bath in a pitcher to under 90 degrees and then take the reading. At that point, it can be temperature corrected to an accurate reading.
Ah, this I was not aware of. Excellent, thanks. My faith in physics may be restored.
__________________
Moonraker is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-26-2012, 11:12 PM   #10
neosapien
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 714
Liked 140 Times on 99 Posts
Likes Given: 395

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooper View Post
Remember that any reading with wort above about 90 degrees is worthless- even with conversion tables/correction software it is notoriously accurate. So I would say the sample at 145 degrees is simply wrong.
Whoops! Totally missed that part of the OP. That'll teach me to talk without reading all the words!
__________________
neosapien is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply



Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what is the secreat to hitting a target starting gravity and final gravity? crookedibrews Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 10 03-05-2012 03:53 AM
The Disappearing Efficiency Dilemma rancidcrabtree Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 4 11-07-2011 03:33 PM
Fastest Disappearing First Batch smata67 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 6 08-19-2010 05:45 AM
quick question on 1st batch -- disappearing bubbles ksavitsk Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 4 03-18-2008 08:31 PM
Disappearing beer! trailmix Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 5 10-03-2005 01:42 AM



Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS