New Giveaway - Wort Monster Conical Fermenter!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > Consequences of a Thinner Mash




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-18-2011, 04:04 PM   #1
maltoftheearth
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
maltoftheearth's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Carthage, North Carolina
Posts: 489
Liked 11 Times on 9 Posts
Likes Given: 20

Default Consequences of a Thinner Mash

Typically I do a 1.25 ratio when I mash but today I had issues with the temperature of my strike water and had to add about a gallon more than usual. The result is a 1.60 ration.

What are the consequences of this? I am looking in Palmer and cannot find an answer!



__________________

Long range forecast:

5G Carboy Primary (1):
5G Carboy Primary (2):
2.5G Carboy Primary:

Kegged: alt, Belgo Clone Wars, Salt n' Peppa IPA, Slip One to the Porter, Russian Oligarch Stout, Rye Around Sally IPA, California Commoner, No Fail Cream Ale.

maltoftheearth is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-18-2011, 04:09 PM   #2
ChillWill
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire
Posts: 851
Liked 14 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Lower FG and less water to sparge with so probably lower efficiency.

I was doing some mashes that were too thin while trying to dial in my process (and spread sheet) and my efficiency suffered and the beer was often a little too dry.

If I was in that situation (again)! I'd just drain some off and save it to sparge with later.



__________________
ChillWill is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-18-2011, 04:17 PM   #3
Nugent
Session ale enthusiast
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Nugent's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 692
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts
Likes Given: 15

Default

Not trying to start a gentlemanly debate, but I listened to an interesting conversation between Tasty and Jamil on a recent episode of CYBI. They both agreed that there was no noticable difference in beers brewed with completely different mash volumes. I found this interesting because of the long-standing discussion that has gone on on HBT. Worth a listen.

A point of interest. Nothing more.

__________________
Nugent is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-18-2011, 04:32 PM   #4
WildGingerBrewing
ISDID, I has it
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
WildGingerBrewing's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 9,877
Liked 1893 Times on 1872 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

I typically mash at about 1.75 qts/lb up to 2 qts/lb sometimes. Never had a problem. My efficiency is always in the low-mid 80's. I started doing it by accident but it has worked so well I have never changed it. I have not ever gotten a really FG and I am usually slightly over my calculated OG. I have no plans to thicken my mash in the near future. If it ain't broke, don't fix it!

__________________
He's too retarded to do anything on his own, but I can easily throw him down a slide. - Marubozo
Doritos are evil. Taco Bell is evil. Ergo, Ginger is Satan. - Shecky
I should have known the thought of Ginger's wang flopping would be enough to kill the TR. - KCBrewer
WildGingerBrewing is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-18-2011, 04:33 PM   #5
maltoftheearth
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
maltoftheearth's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Carthage, North Carolina
Posts: 489
Liked 11 Times on 9 Posts
Likes Given: 20

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nugent View Post
Not trying to start a gentlemanly debate, but I listened to an interesting conversation between Tasty and Jamil on a recent episode of CYBI. They both agreed that there was no noticable difference in beers brewed with completely different mash volumes. I found this interesting because of the long-standing discussion that has gone on on HBT. Worth a listen.

A point of interest. Nothing more.
This makes sense to me b/c if this was NOT the case then the BIAB folks wouldn't be able to do what they do, right?

Figured I would ask b/c I find that if I proceed confidently as if I know the answer to something new then invariably I am proved wrong.
__________________

Long range forecast:

5G Carboy Primary (1):
5G Carboy Primary (2):
2.5G Carboy Primary:

Kegged: alt, Belgo Clone Wars, Salt n' Peppa IPA, Slip One to the Porter, Russian Oligarch Stout, Rye Around Sally IPA, California Commoner, No Fail Cream Ale.

maltoftheearth is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-18-2011, 11:29 PM   #6
Nugent
Session ale enthusiast
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Nugent's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 692
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts
Likes Given: 15

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maltoftheearth View Post
Figured I would ask b/c I find that if I proceed confidently as if I know the answer to something new then invariably I am proved wrong.
Amen. This will be carved on my tombstone.



__________________
Nugent is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-Mash, Partial Mash and Steeping Specialty Grains Daparish Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 32 04-11-2013 10:03 PM
Stout smells of paint thinner? justflow1983 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 5 12-12-2012 12:42 AM
Blow out while traveling - consequences? md20_20 Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 6 09-27-2009 03:55 AM
Final gravity consequences of using amber LME vs. extra pale nebben Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 7 04-20-2009 11:53 PM
Paint thinner Mishkin Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 2 10-20-2006 09:27 PM