New Giveaway - Wort Monster Conical Fermenter!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Beginners Beer Brewing Forum > Can this beer be rescued?




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-20-2013, 12:41 AM   #1
GenIke
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 375
Liked 41 Times on 30 Posts
Likes Given: 72

Default Can this beer be rescued?

The overview: Porter extract kit, 1.060 OG, in primary for 17 days, Windsor yeast, repitched with more windsor after 5 days. Took gravity today and it was 1.030. Obviously poor attenuation and not budging. You can see the wimpy krausen ring in the pics below.

Is there anything I can do? I dont really want to waste time bottling all of this if it's going to be a 2.5% ABV version of chocolate milk.



The other potential problem I have is when I opened the lid to take a reading I was surprised to see this inside:





The flash makes it look a little "whiter" than with the eye. It had a sort of oil spill like sheen to it. I dont know if its normal or a potential infection.

Thanks in advance!



__________________
GenIke is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2013, 12:57 AM   #2
Black
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Jonquiere, Canada
Posts: 130
Liked 10 Times on 9 Posts
Likes Given: 62

Default

I does not look infected, just stalled. Did you try to give it a shake with a sanitized spoon ? I worked for me a few times. It might just need a shake.

Cheers!

Black



__________________
Black is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2013, 12:58 AM   #3
Ogri
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 829
Liked 75 Times on 71 Posts
Likes Given: 47

Default

1.030 is probably a bit high to finish, although I have bottled an all extract porter that finished at 1.028 and it wasn't all that bad after a couple, or so, months bottle conditioning, but that had an OG of about 1.078.

Was this porter Extract, PM or AG? Windsor yeast isn't a really strong attenuating yeast, if memory serves right, but shouldn't have been as weak as that.

What were your fermentation temps like throughout the 17 days of primary?? Certainly looks like it wasn't a very active fermentation/krausen but your present SG of 1.030 suggests it has undergone a considerable %age of the expected attenuation.

Personally, I'd try to warm it up to 70 to 75*f, give the bucket a swirl to try and re-suspend the yeast (sounds like you have plenty yeast pitched, that's for sure) and see if that has any positive effects.
If that didn't cause a change in the SG I'd start thinking about possibly pitching a pack of champagne yeast.

__________________
Ogri is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2013, 12:58 AM   #4
duboman
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Glenview, IL
Posts: 5,810
Liked 429 Times on 402 Posts
Likes Given: 199

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenIke
The overview: Porter extract kit, 1.060 OG, in primary for 17 days, Windsor yeast, repitched with more windsor after 5 days. Took gravity today and it was 1.030. Obviously poor attenuation and not budging. You can see the wimpy krausen ring in the pics below.

Is there anything I can do? I dont really want to waste time bottling all of this if it's going to be a 2.5% ABV version of chocolate milk.

The other potential problem I have is when I opened the lid to take a reading I was surprised to see this inside:

The flash makes it look a little "whiter" than with the eye. It had a sort of oil spill like sheen to it. I dont know if its normal or a potential infection.

Thanks in advance!
What was the OG of the recipe?
Did you aerate the wort?
Did you rehydrate the yeast?
How old was the kit?
What temp did you ferment at?

As to what you see-normal, just some hop oils and yeast floaters. When you rack put a hop sack around the cane and it will filter out in the bottle bucket
__________________
Nothing Left to do but smile and drink beer.....

The Commune Brewing Company-Perfecting the "art" of beer since 2010
duboman is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2013, 01:02 AM   #5
GenIke
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 375
Liked 41 Times on 30 Posts
Likes Given: 72

Default

Extract kit w/ specialty grains.

Fermentation temps were ~ 62 to start. After five days I moved it to ~68, stirred vigorously and repitched (I thought I had zero fermentation at that point).

I cant really get any warmer than 68/69 degrees without getting creative.

__________________
GenIke is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2013, 01:05 AM   #6
GenIke
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 375
Liked 41 Times on 30 Posts
Likes Given: 72

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by duboman View Post
What was the OG of the recipe?
Did you aerate the wort?
Did you rehydrate the yeast?
How old was the kit?
What temp did you ferment at?

As to what you see-normal, just some hop oils and yeast floaters. When you rack put a hop sack around the cane and it will filter out in the bottle bucket
Did you aerate the wort? dumped though mesh screen/ funnel and stirred
Did you rehydrate the yeast? yes, both times
How old was the kit?dont know, cant be too old. the LHBS makes them a couple times a week, I dont know how old the extract itself would have been.
What temp did you ferment at?62 to start, moved up to 68 after 5 days
__________________
GenIke is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2013, 01:15 AM   #7
Ogri
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 829
Liked 75 Times on 71 Posts
Likes Given: 47

Default

Just a thought, but you didn't use a campden tab in your water for this batch, did you? Like a whole tab for 5 gallons??

I've read that doing so can cause fermentation to be a bit lacking in the usual dynamic qualities and to stall out a bit high. I learned after mixing up a 5 gallon carboy of water and 1 Campden tab that I should only have used 1/4 of a tab for the 5 gallons

Have you tasted it?? If so, how was it?

__________________
Ogri is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2013, 01:17 AM   #8
GenIke
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 375
Liked 41 Times on 30 Posts
Likes Given: 72

Default

I dont know what a campden tab is, so no

I have not tasted it. Once I repitched I just wanted to leave it alone for a couple weeks.

__________________
GenIke is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2013, 01:20 AM   #9
Ogri
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 829
Liked 75 Times on 71 Posts
Likes Given: 47

Default

Didn't taste your SG test sample, eh? Oh well, give it a little taste, if it's too sweet maybe consider the champagne yeast route.

Campden tabs (sodium metabisulfite) are to counteract/get rid of chloramines in water.

__________________
Ogri is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2013, 01:29 AM   #10
GenIke
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 375
Liked 41 Times on 30 Posts
Likes Given: 72

Default

I put the hydrometer right in the bucket.

We have chlorine, but not chloramine in our water.

Is there any negative on going the chanpagne yeast route at this point? Seems like my best option, but I'm only 3 real batches into my career. If I go to the LHBS and ask for champagne yeast will they know what I need? is there more than one kind?



__________________
GenIke is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pretty Weird - Nottingham Rescued by Manchester Rossnaree Fermentation & Yeast 1 08-17-2011 09:04 PM
Has anyone rescued a failed carbonation situation? cd2448 Bottling/Kegging 19 12-16-2007 02:16 PM