 |
|
09-25-2008, 03:17 PM
|
#11
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kansas City - the mecca of civilization
Posts: 56
|
Excellent info. For some crazy reason, I wanted to find a way to double check the accuracy and precision of the hydrometer [if I have to retake O Chem to make up for a C a decade ago, I might see if I can double check it in the lab], but it looks like that is probably not necessary.
This thread would be finished if there were more pics.
|
|
|
09-25-2008, 03:27 PM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: East Dundee, Illinois
Posts: 4,961
|
I guess if you wanted to double check you could perhaps weight a sample of beer, keep it at 173 degrees for a long while then measure it again to see how much alcohol boiled off, the problem being you may boil off some water as well, so I'm not sure how to account for that.
__________________
"People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people." - V
Primary: Nothin
Secondary: Shady Lord RIS, Water to Barleywine, Pumpkin wine, burnt mead
Kegged: Crappy infected mild
Bottles: Apfelwein, 999 Barleywine, Oatmeal Stout, Robust Porter, Robust smoked porter, Simcoe Smash
|
|
|
09-25-2008, 03:47 PM
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Leland, NC
Posts: 1,625
|
My LHBS is primarily a winery. In order to sell his wine, the owner has to have a very precise measurement of the alcohol content in his product. He uses a Ebulliometer.
I don't know the whole process of how it's used.
ebulliometers: Ebulliometer Dujardin Salleron Alcohol Burner @ Wine-Testing-Supplies.com
What is an Ebulliometer?
I don't know if it could be used on beer.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by olllllo
Every brewer here would tuck in his junk to have this opportunity.
|
Quote:
|
A child-like man is not a man whose development has been arrested; on the contrary, he is a man who has given himself a chance of continuing to develop long after most adults have muffled themselves in the cocoon of middle-aged habit and convention. Aldous Huxley
|
Fat Duc Brewing
Special Character cheatsheets
|
|
|
09-25-2008, 05:07 PM
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central PA
Posts: 5,200
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BierMuncher
Chug a 12 ounce glass on and empty stomach.
Honestly, $8.00 for a hydrometer is the simplest method.
|
Holy cow, are they that expensive nowadays?
I concur, buy one of them thar hydros
__________________
Event Horizon ~ A tribute to the miracle of fermentation.
Brew what you like. Do this, and you will find your inner brewer.
|
|
|
09-25-2008, 05:28 PM
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 1,100
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quikfeet509
Excellent info. For some crazy reason, I wanted to find a way to double check the accuracy and precision of the hydrometer [if I have to retake O Chem to make up for a C a decade ago, I might see if I can double check it in the lab], but it looks like that is probably not necessary.
This thread would be finished if there were more pics.
|
"Gravity" is just a measure of density, so assuming you have a good enough way to measure volume and mass, you can get the original density and final density of the beer.
I mean, if you take a 100 ml sample, and the mass is 105.5 grams, then you have a density of 1.055 g / ml. Notice that since water has a density of 1 g / ml, that this density is the exact same as "gravity". You can get your final density (gravity) the same way, and use the formula that's already been posted in this thread.
The downside is you can see how accurate you have to be with samples even as large as 100 ml.
|
|
|
09-24-2010, 05:55 AM
|
#16
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Mukilteo,WA
Posts: 14
|
Is there a formula to determine abv with just f/g? brix and hydro reading? I believe there is just want to make sure. ?
|
|
|
09-24-2010, 06:47 AM
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 187
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKJeremy
Is there a formula to determine abv with just f/g?
|
Nope.
|
|
|
09-24-2010, 11:22 AM
|
#18
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 106
|
Actually the OG-FG method using a hydrometer is NOT completely accurate. Just so close to right that nobody needs to worry. The reason it's not completely accurate is because as has already been mentioned you are measuring the total density of the wort/beer not just that of the water and sugar(OG) and then the same water minus the sugar(FG). Other compounds which can affect the density of your sample also drop out of suspension over time as well as the fact that alcohol has a different specific gravity compared to water which throws your calculation off because the FG isn't just water minus the sugar of the OG, it's water and alcohol minus sugar. But everybody is right in that it's the way to go. It's cheap and as accurate as homebrewers need to be, even for competitions. Ie if measure and calculate a brew to 5% and it really turns out to be 5.09, do you think anyone can tell or will even care?
|
|
|
09-24-2010, 01:07 PM
|
#19
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 3,657
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fermentedhiker
Actually the OG-FG method using a hydrometer is NOT completely accurate. Just so close to right that nobody needs to worry. The reason it's not completely accurate is because as has already been mentioned you are measuring the total density of the wort/beer not just that of the water and sugar(OG) and then the same water minus the sugar(FG). Other compounds which can affect the density of your sample also drop out of suspension over time as well as the fact that alcohol has a different specific gravity compared to water which throws your calculation off because the FG isn't just water minus the sugar of the OG, it's water and alcohol minus sugar. But everybody is right in that it's the way to go. It's cheap and as accurate as homebrewers need to be, even for competitions. Ie if measure and calculate a brew to 5% and it really turns out to be 5.09, do you think anyone can tell or will even care?
|
The state of TX does!
More seriously though, the 131 thing is a very crude linear approximation and one that was fit using data from wine (the homebrewing literature borrowed it from the home wine making literature, rather non-critically).
There is a better approximation due to Balling (via Fix). Anyone interested can find it in posts by Fix on HBD or posts by me here.
|
|
|
09-24-2010, 01:20 PM
|
#20
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Leominster, MA
Posts: 948
|
If you have access to a GC, that would work very nicely. Much more accurate than a hydrometer. Make sure they don't mind you using their 5 figure piece of equipment to test your beer.
Look here's one for only $7,000! I'm definitely getting that next time I break my hydrometer!
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|