Rebel Brewer Giveaway!
 Home Brew Forums > Replacing grain with extract - conversion help

02-15-2013, 12:56 PM   #1
mezhan
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 10
 Replacing grain with extract - conversion help

Hey all,

So I've read that when you replace malted grain with extract, there is a pound to pound conversion. The numbers I've read at .65 for DME and .75 for LME (can anyone vouch for these?) but my question is do I need to use a multiplier for tun efficiency?

For example, I would add 7 lbs to my tun but the efficiency is only 0.85. Do I take 7*0.85 then multiply it by 0.65 if I want to get pounds of LME? I assumed the extracts are 100% efficiency.

Thanks!

__________________

I'm the best brew master in my garage

02-15-2013, 01:08 PM   #2
progmac
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cincy, OH
Posts: 1,247
Liked 134 Times on 111 Posts
Likes Given: 133

potential gravity of ---
2-row: 1.036
LME: 1.038
DME: 1.042

36 * 0.70 mash efficiency = 25.2
25.2 / 38 = 0.66
25.2 / 42= 0.60

therefore if an all grain recipe assumes 70% efficiency, your ratio would be 0.66 pounds of liquid extract per pound of grain or 0.6 pounds of dry extract per pound of grain.

in a high-efficiency example, like your 85% example, the ratio would be
36* 0.85 = 30.6
30.6 / 38 = 0.81
30.6 / 42 = 0.73

therefore with 85% mash efficiency, your ratio would be 0.81 pounds of LME per pound of grain or 0.73 pounds of DME per pound of grain.

-------
the "short" answer is that the "typical" conversions you see assume an efficiency in the 68-75% range.

__________________

на здравје!

02-15-2013, 01:19 PM   #3
mezhan
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 10

Quote:
 Originally Posted by progmac ...redacted, recalculating
haha, well my thought is that those conversion numbers must be somewhat accurate otherwise you'd hear peoples OGs and FGs turned out different than they expected.

I suspect it would be a per brewer calculation, as depending on your tun and method you will result in different efficiencies.
__________________

I'm the best brew master in my garage

02-15-2013, 01:24 PM   #4
progmac
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cincy, OH
Posts: 1,247
Liked 134 Times on 111 Posts
Likes Given: 133

Quote:
 Originally Posted by mezhan haha, well my thought is that those conversion numbers must be somewhat accurate otherwise you'd hear peoples OGs and FGs turned out different than they expected. I suspect it would be a per brewer calculation, as depending on your tun and method you will result in different efficiencies.
__________________

на здравје!

02-15-2013, 01:26 PM   #5
mezhan
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 10

Quote:
 Originally Posted by progmac i edited my original reply, should be more helpful
Awesome response, much appreciated! A lot more information than I expected, which is always a good thing!
__________________

I'm the best brew master in my garage

02-15-2013, 01:39 PM   #6
whoaru99
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,400
Liked 100 Times on 79 Posts
Likes Given: 14

Hopefully not too much of a side-track, but looks like about 10% difference between LME and DME. I thought it was more like 20% difference based on previous readings?

__________________

Primary: Waldo Lake Amber
Primary: Edwort's Apfelwein
Secondary: Russian Imperial Stout
Drinking: Edwort's Apfelwein
Drinking: Hank's Hefeweizen
Drinking: Irish Dry Stout
Drinking: Maibock

"Charlie don't surf."

02-15-2013, 01:48 PM   #7
progmac
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cincy, OH
Posts: 1,247
Liked 134 Times on 111 Posts
Likes Given: 133

Quote:
 Originally Posted by whoaru99 Hopefully not too much of a side-track, but looks like about 10% difference between LME and DME. I thought it was more like 20% difference based on previous readings?
I noticed that too. I used a potential gravity of 1.042 for DME, but I think in reality some of it is more like 1.045.

assuming 1.045 instead of 1.042 would make it look like:
2-row: 1.036
LME: 1.038
DME: 1.045

again using the examples of a 70% grain mash efficiency and an 85% grain mash efficiency --

36 * 0.70 mash efficiency = 25.2
25.2 / 38 = 0.66 pounds of lme per pound of grain
25.2 / 4= 0.56 pounds of dme per pound of grain

36 * 0.85 mash efficiency = 30.6
36* 0.85 = 30.6
30.6 / 38 = 0.81 pounds of lme per pound of grain
30.6 / 45 = 0.68 pounds of dme per pound of grain

__________________

на здравје!