 |
09-05-2010, 09:30 AM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bosnia and Herzegovina
Posts: 582
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
india pale ale extract kit
|
|
I got this from a friend, and I will brew it soon: http://www.muntons.com/homebeer/countries/uk/gold_india.html
now I need advice for two things.
first, what yeast to use for this brew? what would be the most appropriate strain?
and second, since they offer two choices - to make a beer of 1.041 OG (Troops Tipple), or to add 1 kg of sugar and make Higher Ranks Reserve version which is stronger....
I'd like the stronger one if the sugar wont affect drinkability.
I'd like advice from those of you who already have brewed both versions... if there are such people here...
also, if I make a stronger version, I thought of adding brown cane sugar.... any thoughts on this?
thanks a lot
__________________
Brew me a river...
|
|
|
09-05-2010, 04:03 PM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Americas Hinterland, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,574
Liked 20 Times on 19 Posts Likes Given: 205
|
|
|
|
09-10-2010, 06:21 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bryn Mawr, PA
Posts: 744
Liked 19 Times on 19 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
For basically any IPA, I'd vote for California Ale Yeast WLP001. It's a clean tasting yeast which goes well with hops. If you'd prefer dry yeast, Safale US-05 is good too.
Malt flavor, or sweetness, is created by unfermentable sugars left in the beer by the yeast. If you SUBSTITUTE corn sugar for malts, you're decreasing the unfermentable (or "residual") sugars in your final product. That's why sugar makes beer LESS sweet.
If you ADD sugar to your existing recipe, without removing any of the ingredients, it won't affect the flavor much. It will, however, boost the alcohol, and give the beer a bit more bite. It sounds like that's what you'll be doing here.
__________________
Primary 1: Hasty IPA
Primary 2:
Secondary: Soured Golden
Kegged: American Wheat
Bottled: Belgian Golden Ale.
Planning: American Amber
|
|
|
09-10-2010, 08:04 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 42
|
I brewed a Munton's Nut Brown Ale kit... it came with yeast. It's possible your kit comes with yeast as well. Besides selecting a custom yeast, you'll have that as an option as well.
|
|
|
09-16-2010, 01:09 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: annapolis
Posts: 17
|
+1 for US-05, I think I love this yeast 
|
|
|
09-16-2010, 01:28 PM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bosnia and Herzegovina
Posts: 582
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
if I decide to boost the ABV by using brown cane sugar instead of white table sugar, what can I expect in the final product? Any significant flavour changes from what originally it's supposed to be?
Honestly, I have never tried IPA so I don't know what it should be, and I would like to try IPA in it's original form (flavor, aroma, drinkability and everything else that makes it specific)
__________________
Brew me a river...
|
|
|
09-16-2010, 01:39 PM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bryn Mawr, PA
Posts: 744
Liked 19 Times on 19 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
Everybody talks up the liquid yeasts - and I agree; you really can't make a decent wheat, or a stout or anything LIKE a belgian with dry yeast. But US-05 does a good job, for my taste, with pale ales and IPAs. It's cheap, and easy to store. So why not?
__________________
Primary 1: Hasty IPA
Primary 2:
Secondary: Soured Golden
Kegged: American Wheat
Bottled: Belgian Golden Ale.
Planning: American Amber
|
|
|
09-16-2010, 01:55 PM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bryn Mawr, PA
Posts: 744
Liked 19 Times on 19 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
Brown sugar won't affect taste significantly, but I imagine it will leave you with a slightly darker beer.
__________________
Primary 1: Hasty IPA
Primary 2:
Secondary: Soured Golden
Kegged: American Wheat
Bottled: Belgian Golden Ale.
Planning: American Amber
|
|
|
09-16-2010, 03:45 PM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: annapolis
Posts: 17
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pericles
Everybody talks up the liquid yeasts - and I agree; you really can't make a decent wheat, or a stout or anything LIKE a belgian with dry yeast. But US-05 does a good job, for my taste, with pale ales and IPAs. It's cheap, and easy to store. So why not?
|
hmm I really liked my american wheat kit from NB that I used us-05 for. I'm a complete noob though, so maybe next time I flip the extra bucks for the liquid. What can I expect to be different taste wise with the liquid wyeast 1010?
The reason I did dry is, I was researching a beer that is dirt cheap and is quick from boil to bottle. The american wheat kit from NB is $21 with us-05 and $24 with wyeast 1010. Regardless, great beer for 50 cents per 12oz.
|
|
|
09-16-2010, 03:58 PM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bryn Mawr, PA
Posts: 744
Liked 19 Times on 19 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
AMERICAN wheat beers probably will turn out OK with US-05, because they're essentially just pale ales made with wheat. The distinctive flavor is, in large measure, supplied by the grain bill and not the yeast. Thus a clean fermenting yeast like US-05 does a good job. A specialty yeast probably would be BETTER in order to achieve ALL the characteristics of the style. It'd also probably help ferment the wheat more fully.
GERMAN or BELGIAN wheats, on the other hand, really do require specialty yeasts. That's how you get the classic banana nose.
__________________
Primary 1: Hasty IPA
Primary 2:
Secondary: Soured Golden
Kegged: American Wheat
Bottled: Belgian Golden Ale.
Planning: American Amber
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|