 |
|
02-06-2008, 11:20 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lugoff, SC
Posts: 200
|
Big Boils
|
|
my brother (and i ) recently cooked up an extract recipe for an ESB. the recipe called for us to boil 6-6.5 GALLONS of water! i believe that this was a mistake/typo. but it clearly said gallons.
we decided to do a 3 gallon boil, mostly because the brewpot was 4 gallons max. have any of you ever done or heard of doing a boil this large on an extract recipe?
assuming that the 6 gallon direction is valid (which i still don't)...what are the possible consequences of reducing the boil by half?
__________________
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotamy!
|
|
|
02-06-2008, 11:44 PM
|
#2
|
|
Flyfisherman/brewer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,914
|
A full boil is less common in extract brewing. It's not totally necessary but if you CAN do it, it can be beneficial.
The consequences of reducing the boil volume without adjusting the recipe is going to be reduced bitterness and darker colour. A method called the 'late extract addition' can help you resolve both of these issues.
Oh and the reason the boil was 6-6.5 gallons for a 5 gallon batch is that when you boil that full volume you get quite a lot of evaporation. The idea is to have your target amount in the kettle when the boil is finished, so that no topping up is necessary.
|
|
|
02-06-2008, 11:49 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lugoff, SC
Posts: 200
|
i actually figured out the late extract method might be good to apply here, so we put 50% in at the start of a 60 minute boil, and 50% in with 15 minutes to go.
i can see the need for huge boil if you are boiling down to 5 gallons...but i have NEVER, and i mean NEVER heard of boiling so much wort for an extract recipe, EVER. that was new to me.
__________________
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotamy!
|
|
|
02-06-2008, 11:52 PM
|
#4
|
|
Flyfisherman/brewer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,914
|
I imagine once many people get to the point of doing full boils they've gone down the partial mash or all grain roads.
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 12:13 AM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Halifax, Canada
Posts: 642
|
I wouldn't necessarily recommend simple extract brewers try full boils, just because it's damn hard to get 6.5 gallons to boil on the stovetop. I wouldn't ever go to that trouble were I not all grain.
__________________
Next: Tousted Out Stoat, Hop Bomb, Ordinary Bitter
Bubbling: Belgian Summer Bitter, Vienna Steam Beer
Conditioning:Greenwall Lambic
Kegged: Christmas Ale
Bottle Conditioning:
Drinking: Saison Bâtard
The Green Wall Nanobrewery
tibi non nolis
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 01:13 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR, Oregon
Posts: 6,463
|
Full boils are good practice for going to all grain. When I was getting my AG gear, the first thing I got was a turkey fryer. I did about 4 extract batches on it before I finally had all my AG gear ready to go.
__________________
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 03:59 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Piscataway, NJ
Posts: 19,422
|
That's exactly why I did it. I did probably 4 extract full boils before I went all grain. It took some of the task load away because I already knew how to handle (COOL) 5 gallons of hot wort.
__________________
BrewHardware.com
Sightglass, Refractometer, Ball Valve, Weldless bulkhead, Thermometer, Decals, Stainless Steel Fittings, Compression Fittings, Camlock Quick Disconnects, Scale, RIMS tube, Plate Chiller, Chugger Pump, Super Clear Silicone Tubing, and more!
Personal Website, All Grain Primer, Keg Polishing, etc... | Youtube Channel
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 07:35 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 89
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by razyrsharpe
i can see the need for huge boil if you are boiling down to 5 gallons...but i have NEVER, and i mean NEVER heard of boiling so much wort for an extract recipe, EVER. that was new to me.
|
What rock have you been living under? 6-6.5 gallon boils are nothing if you look around these boards people have way bigger batches than that.
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 07:45 PM
|
#9
|
|
Maniacally Malty
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 21,798
|
it's difficult to do on a stove, but if you have a propane burner, go for it! you'll also need a wort chiller or some way to really cool the wort, though.
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 08:23 PM
|
#10
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 55
|
I've been doing full-volume boils for extract recipes from day 1 (~14 batches). All the kits I buy from More Beer are geared towards a full boil.
Granted, I work outside on a stand-alone burner, so I don't have the problems, or the benefits, associated with working inside.
Benefits of a full boil for extract brewing are less carmelization of the wort (which can be mitigated by late extract additions), and better utilization of hops.
I just listened to an older Brewing Network podcast where Jamil said that going to full boil is the best way to improve extract-based brewing, followed closely by fermentation temp control.
YMMV
__________________
Primary: Bee Cave Pale Ale
Secondary: ~nada~
Drinking: yes
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|