 |
|
11-18-2012, 02:23 AM
|
#31
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tonawanda, NY
Posts: 509
Liked 16 Times on 15 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
I'm around 71-72%, primarily because of an inconsistent pasta-roller mill. I expect these numbers to rise upon purchase of a better mill. Kyle
|
|
|
11-18-2012, 05:11 PM
|
#32
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: dillsburg, pa
Posts: 362
Liked 10 Times on 10 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OG2620
I hear ya. He did also mention batch sparging in the title so I just assumed that he was looking at mash efficiency. Unfortunately, I'm wired to automatically refer to mash efficiency, especially in recipe formulation. Hopefully, this thread will teach me to be more discerning in the future.
|
The efficiancy number I am concerned about is brew house. this is the number I need for formulating recipes in my recipe calculator. most of us usually will be in the 75-80% brew house efficiency range.
|
|
|
11-18-2012, 05:52 PM
|
#33
|
|
Feedback Score: 14 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Greenfield, Indiana
Posts: 286
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts Likes Given: 2
|
Does crushing your grains at home even after the LHBS crushes them hurt anything?
|
|
|
11-18-2012, 06:27 PM
|
#34
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: dillsburg, pa
Posts: 362
Liked 10 Times on 10 Posts Likes Given: 4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenShowerGladiator
Does crushing your grains at home even after the LHBS crushes them hurt anything?
|
as long as you don't crush into powder double crushing is ok.
|
|
|
11-19-2012, 12:40 AM
|
#35
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 4
|
I usually get between 80-85% sparging a biab using a corona mill. Still tweaking my system so that explains the wider than usual gap.
|
|
|
11-20-2012, 12:54 AM
|
#36
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Stewartstown, PA
Posts: 675
Liked 24 Times on 21 Posts Likes Given: 5
|
Actually was talking about efficiency as measured in kettle pre-boil:
So, to make sure I am not slaughtering terminology......
100% Mash Efficiency would means you convert ALL of the POTENTIAL sugars out of the grains.....i.e. Potential Max SG (which is impossible).....
Next you sparge....and rinse as much of these converted sugars out of the mash tun and into brew kettle......
So....this is what I was talking about....the efficiency in the kettle after mash and sparge......
I believe this is the efficiency that is calculated in Beersmith right?
Based on the POTENTIAL SG of the grain bill.....and the actual SG you end up with.....
So if the POTENTIAL of the grain bill is say 1.080 (for 100% efficiency)....and you end up with 1.060....that would be a Total Efficiency of 75%
Do I have this right?
__________________
EVERYONE is entitled to my opinion!
Primary #1: Irish Red
Primary #2: Empty
Primary #3: Empty
Upcoming Brews:
Dry Stout
Bottled:
Bee Cave Hefeweizen
Sweet Stout
Nut Brown
|
|
|
11-20-2012, 04:18 AM
|
#37
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Eagleville, Pennsylvania
Posts: 751
Liked 49 Times on 47 Posts Likes Given: 3
|
Yeah that would be your mash efficiency.
__________________
Beer Plus Science = .....Good!!!!! By: Adam Savage
|
|
|
11-20-2012, 09:31 PM
|
#38
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 35
Likes Given: 1
|
Currently averaging ~75% mash and ~62% brewhouse efficiencies... although I'm sure the crush is the largest limiting factor since I don't have a mill and I order all my ingredients online.
__________________
Primary: open
Secondary: open
Bottled: Noch ein Hefeweizen, Incredible Pain in the Ass (IPA), Coffee Stout, Poppin' Cherries (Cherry Chocolate Stout), Bourbon Barrel Imperial Stout, Creme Brulee Clone, Apfelwein
On deck: Cherrywood Smoked Ale
|
|
|
11-20-2012, 09:37 PM
|
#39
|
|
Read aloud: I'm a dumbass
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 4,230
Liked 211 Times on 182 Posts Likes Given: 35
|
Start at 70%. Dilution is easier than adding extract at the end, personally.
I get 80% every time now. Volume is important, or else your numbers are skewed, ie. overshooting sparge volumes, boiling off too much, etc.
__________________
_________________________________
Skal!
Den Faaborg Bryggeri
Quote:
Originally Posted by davekippen
Open log Fermenting and gas-can secondary?? I am planning my next brew right now!!
|
|
|
|
11-21-2012, 05:08 AM
|
#40
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 199
Liked 9 Times on 8 Posts Likes Given: 15
|
Consistently getting 60-62% from both my LHBS and NB. I keep changing one thing, giving it another go, checking, and pressing on. Really a bummer, time to review everything again.
__________________
Primary: Sorachi Ace clone, Saison DewPoint, Simcoe Imperial IPA | Kegs: 2 full of water, 2 empty, Pale Ale Carbing | Bottled: Red Ale, Black IPA, IPA, Apfelwein, Centennial Blonde
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|