The Great Bottle Opener Giveaway

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > Promash Efficiency Numbers.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-12-2007, 05:26 AM   #1
jdoiv
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jdoiv's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,149
Default Promash Efficiency Numbers.

Ok. I could use a little help from the ProMash folks on the board.

When you do your efficiency, do you take a volume measurement in the kettle or the fermenter? I've been using the kettle as I feel I can measure the volume better (though I'm starting to have some doubts about this).

Tonight, I brewed up my Belgian Wit and it looked like I had about 11.5 gallons in the kettle after the boil. Once I drained the kettles to the fermenters though, it looks like I'm closer to 12 gallons. When I plug the numbers into ProMash, I got a 80% efficiency with the kettle numbers and a 92% efficiency on the fermenter numbers. Sort of a big difference.

My last batch was about 82% based on the kettle numbers and 87% on the fermenter. The one before that would have been around 77% kettle and 87% based on the fermenter.

Anyone have a thought on why these numbers are so different?

I think I'm going to measure out each kettle and fermenter and mark them with graduation marks so I can get a better handle on this.

__________________
Drinking on the keg: BPA, Brown Ale, Dry Mead, Wee Heavy aged on Oak, CAP
Drinking in the Bottle:
Conditioning:
Fermenting:
Planning:
jdoiv is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-12-2007, 05:41 AM   #2
Denny's Evil Concoctions
Grande Megalomaniac
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Denny's Evil Concoctions's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: West Kelowna BC, Canada
Posts: 7,767
Liked 50 Times on 42 Posts

Default

Shouldn't matter. You set your batch size in your recipe. Take a gravity reading beofre yeast pitch in and that SG vs the reicpes estimated SG (OG) shows if you are up or down on you est. efficency.

__________________

I may not be an expert, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express........ 6 months ago.

http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f39/denn...9/#post1766281

http://groups.homebrewtalk.com/Tapro...ook_Repository

Denny's Evil Concoctions is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-12-2007, 05:52 AM   #3
RichBrewer
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
RichBrewer's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 5,749
Liked 77 Times on 35 Posts
Likes Given: 66

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdoiv
Anyone have a thought on why these numbers are so different?

I think I'm going to measure out each kettle and fermenter and mark them with graduation marks so I can get a better handle on this.
You hit the nail on the head here. In order for the efficiency numbers to be correct you have to have accurate measurements in the fermenters and the brew pot. Another factor to take into account is how much wort is wasted due to grain absorption, loss in the mash/lauter tun, and loss in the brew pot. If you are only guessing or estimating all of these (like I do) your efficiency numbers will not be accurate.
__________________

Cheers,
Rich

RichBrewer is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-12-2007, 06:00 AM   #4
Blender
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Blender's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, CA.
Posts: 3,116
Liked 5 Times on 4 Posts

Default

I always thought that if you set your batch size for what you want in the fermentor,then your reading at that point would be the basis for your efficiency.

__________________

Gary

Blender is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-12-2007, 07:21 AM   #5
Jaybird
Vendor
HBT_SPONSOR.png
HomeBrewTalk 2012 Vendor Giveaway Participate
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
Jaybird's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nor*Cal
Posts: 5,314
Liked 242 Times on 169 Posts
Likes Given: 85

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blender
I always thought that if you set your batch size for what you want in the fermentor,then your reading at that point would be the basis for your efficiency.
totally correct because part of efficiency is losses in the brewery and thats to take in account ALL losses. in the mash , in the transfer, in the boil, in the wort chiller ETC. its obtained gravity units from obtainable gravity units. But it has to get to the fermenter before you can measure it
Cheers
JJ
__________________
Need a False Bottom for your Keg, Kettle or Cooler?

I have been making custom False Bottoms for just about everything since 2008

Nor Cal Brewing Solutions, Reddings local homebrew store
(530)243-BEER and (530)221-WINE


Still have questions PM me here or hit the website.

http://www.norcalbrewingsolutions.com and like us on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/NorCalBrewingSolutionsfor Facebook only promos too
Jaybird is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-12-2007, 11:53 AM   #6
FlyingHorse
Formerly Bike N Brew
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
FlyingHorse's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Evanston IL
Posts: 1,864
Liked 10 Times on 10 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdoiv
When you do your efficiency, do you take a volume measurement in the kettle or the fermenter?
It shouldn't matter, as long as you're (a) getting an accurate volume measurement and (b) taking the SG at the same point in the process as your volume measurement. FWIW, I measure them pre-boil, to get just the efficiency of my mash/sparge. Nothing after that point is likely to change it much, unless you're losing a lot of wort somewhere.
__________________
No signature required.
FlyingHorse is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 05-12-2007, 01:26 PM   #7
jdoiv
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jdoiv's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,149
Default

Ok, I've figured out part of the problem. I take my measurements in the kettles by using a steal yard stick and doing the math to determine gallons. Only my math was wrong. I've always taken the measurement and multiplied by 1.4 (as in one gallon equals 1.4 inches in my kettle). But it should be 1.31. This meant my final volume was off by .8 of a gallon.

I think I'll also try to figure out where some of my other waste may be lying around.

Good news is that I have just over 12 gallons in the fermenters. Bad news is my hop utilization is going to be off some. This could explain why some of my beers don't have the hop bite I would like.

Thanks for the help.

__________________
Drinking on the keg: BPA, Brown Ale, Dry Mead, Wee Heavy aged on Oak, CAP
Drinking in the Bottle:
Conditioning:
Fermenting:
Planning:
jdoiv is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crazy Brewhouse Efficiency numbers brew hoperator All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 14 09-19-2008 03:08 AM
my efficiency numbers are wack! SenorWanderer All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 15 04-03-2008 03:17 PM
48 Quart Coleman Folks, what are you Getting for Efficiency Numbers? RLinNH All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 20 01-19-2008 07:21 AM
Numbers numbers everywhere! My efficiency is??? Zymurgrafi All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 40 12-14-2007 12:22 AM
Calculating efficiency with Promash davidkrau All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 2 04-03-2006 02:32 AM