Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > Not entirely happy with my efficency!




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-09-2013, 04:23 AM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oxford, Ohio
Posts: 348
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jma99
Grasshopper! You are missing the point!
Efficiency is NOT important!
Consistency IS important!

Better to always hit 65% than to be all over the board!
If you are consistent, just add a bit more grain!
That is the problem... Consistency! I have been all over the place 71% once, 59% the next and anywhere in between. If I was within 2% every time and I was only getting 55% EVERY TIME. I would at least be able to know exactly where I was going to be with any given recipe. Like I said before I'm not asking you how to get high efficiency. I'm asking you how to get consistent!


moorerm04 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-09-2013, 06:40 AM   #12
Acolyte of Fermentalism
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Echoloc8's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Alabaster, Alabama
Posts: 306
Liked 32 Times on 26 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moorerm04 View Post
Like I said before I'm not asking you how to get high efficiency. I'm asking you how to get consistent!
This is what happened in my thread. Several people assumed since I mentioned efficiency I wanted to go as high as possible when I wanted consistency first and foremost.

Then I got a few good comments on how to achieve consistency through ferreting out efficiency problems (well, specifically conversion issues), and it all started to make more sense.

-Rich


__________________
Primary: Rich's Legal Wit | 15-Minute Pale Ale | 2013 EdWort's Apfelwein | 2012 JAOM 3-gal
Secondary: Kasteel Rouge clone | 2013 Velvet Hammer RIS | 2012 Kit Raspberry Merlot | 2013 Kit Cabernet
Bottled: 2013 Fireside Barleywine | 2012 Pranqster clone | 2012 Kit Merlot | 2012 Kit Green Apple Riesling | 2007 Oaked orange blossom mead | 2012 Barleywine
Kegged: Honey Kolsch (lagering) | Bombardier clone (conditioning)
On Deck: Traditional Porter | Apfelwein Skeeter Pee
Echoloc8 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-09-2013, 03:15 PM   #13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oxford, Ohio
Posts: 348
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Echoloc8

This is what happened in my thread. Several people assumed since I mentioned efficiency I wanted to go as high as possible when I wanted consistency first and foremost.

Then I got a few good comments on how to achieve consistency through ferreting out efficiency problems (well, specifically conversion issues), and it all started to make more sense.

-Rich
I noticed this in yours as well. I'm just not happy with planning a recipe for 70% and getting 60%. Or visa versa. I just want to be able to plan a recipe and brew day and hit my numbers.
moorerm04 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-09-2013, 03:26 PM   #14
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TrubDog's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Cle Elum, WA
Posts: 367
Liked 27 Times on 23 Posts

Default

I was consistently hitting 60-70% until I bought my BC. I now consistently hit 80-82%.

In my experience inconsistent milling = inconsistent efficiency.
TrubDog is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-09-2013, 03:36 PM   #15
L Seven Brewing Co.
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BigRedHopHead's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 240
Liked 16 Times on 15 Posts
Likes Given: 46

Default

For me early on I had the same issues with consistency using the LHBS mill. I bought and modified a Corona mill which helped solved the the crush issues. I was able to get 75-78% every time. I always felt like a jerk asking the LHBS to check their gap or double mill, it seemed to annoy them to have to do more work to make me happy.

Since Dec I have upgraded to a Monster Mill MM2 2.0 and use the Bru'n Water spreadsheet to adjust my water profile and keep pH levels around 5.4. This has helped improve efficiency to 85-88%. No stuck sparges. BTW I cooler mash and batch sparge once with no mashout ever. Single infusion. After reading Kaiser's work on mash thickness I have been mashing around 1.75 qt/lb - 2.0 qt/lb depending on the beer. This has helped reduced any chances of doughballs. I stir like crazy at the beginning and usually just a bit every 20 min of mash. Hope this helps!
__________________
Beer is the answer....but I can't remember the question.
BigRedHopHead is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-09-2013, 04:15 PM   #16
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Bsquared's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,591
Liked 25 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 8

Default

How do you mash in? do you pour your strike water in onto the grain, pour the grain into the water, or come in through the drain? inconsistencies with mash efficiencies can be the result of dough balls, or when parts of the grain dont get wet during the mash in. dough balls tend to form more readily when you pour the strike water on to the grain. its important to really get in to the mash and break up any dough balls that form. If you can, filling from the bottom through the grain is the best way to get a good even wetting and avoid forming of dough balls.
Bsquared is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-10-2013, 10:29 PM   #17
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oxford, Ohio
Posts: 348
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts

Default

I add the strike water to my mash tun and then dough in slowly and stir the fire out if it while I'm adding grain. I know for sure I'm not getting dough balls. I really think it is because of the LHBS mill. I would rather have my own mill anyway so I'm going to get one And see if that helps.
moorerm04 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-10-2013, 11:20 PM   #18
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Fallbrook, ca
Posts: 121
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

According to How to Brew you're supposed to add water to the grain not the other way around.
__________________
Primary: Rebel Red (West Coast Red)
Secondary: Arrogant Butthole on Oak and Chinook
Bottled: Hillcrest Pale Ale 2.0, Arrogant Butthole
Next: American Stout
Hop_Hero is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-10-2013, 11:25 PM   #19
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eugene OR
Posts: 3,412
Liked 225 Times on 172 Posts
Likes Given: 143

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hop_Hero View Post
According to How to Brew you're supposed to add water to the grain not the other way around.
It makes absolutely no difference. Do whichever works best for you.
__________________
Life begins at 60....1.060, that is!

www.dennybrew.com
Denny is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-10-2013, 11:29 PM   #20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 198
Liked 23 Times on 16 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

Second double crush. My efficency became much more consistent after I started doing that.

Too high an efficency is not a very good thing. I've gotten it in the 80s before and it didn't help my beer, just made it under hopped.


mojo_wire is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First AG: Horrible Efficency hoptopia All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 29 09-29-2011 06:31 PM
Help with efficency mrbugawkagawk All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 22 12-07-2009 03:22 PM
73% efficency without a HLT! Grimsawyer All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 16 09-06-2009 12:10 PM
93% efficency Denny's Evil Concoctions All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 12 04-26-2007 04:38 AM
What sort of efficency are you getting? mezman All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 20 08-27-2006 10:30 AM



FOLLOW US ON