 |
02-13-2008, 03:07 AM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 139
|
Mash temp vs body
|
|
What affects the body of the beer the most, the temperature of the mash-in or the length of the mash?
Beersmith shows
fully body as 158 deg. 45 min,
medium body 154 deg, 60 min.
light body 150 deg, 75 min.
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 03:11 AM
|
#2
|
|
Pour, Drink, Pee, Repeat
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 694
Liked 8 Times on 6 Posts
|
Temperature will affect it most. I think you could go 45 minutes or close to it at 150F.
__________________
Kegged: Belgian Dark Strong, Robust Porter
Secondary: --
Primary: --
Next Up: Ryewine
Projects: Freezer Conversion (Done), HERMS (Done), Lager Fermentation Mini-fridge Extension (Done)
Drinking: Great Lakes Edmund Fitzgerald, Fuller's 1845, Lakefront Fixed Gear, beers from SAVOR
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 05:13 AM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TRI-CITIES, WA.
Posts: 137
|
I just purchased Beersmith about a month or so ago and noticed just what you stated. Since I've been brewing. about 3 yrs. now, I was using a mach more on the low end of the temp and all those beers ended very dry (light) body and were very good. After getting Beersmith I tried my last 2 utilizing the 158F to try and get more body. This past weekend I racked my latest Scocttish stout and noticed that My fg apears to have been left at the higher end. OG 1.078 FG 1.020 My sample tasted likke it was going to have a lot more body than all my previous. So... guess I'd have to say that the temp was more of the determing factor body wise.
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 12:57 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,278
Liked 21 Times on 19 Posts
|
I think the time is a function of the temperature. I.e., the lower the temp., the longer it takes the enzymes to convert the starches to sugars, be it beta or alpha amylase. So, in short, time (in itself) doesn't affect body near as much as temp. does.
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 01:34 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Jenison, MI
Posts: 2,875
Liked 10 Times on 10 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by menschmaschine
I think the time is a function of the temperature. I.e., the lower the temp., the longer it takes the enzymes to convert the starches to sugars, be it beta or alpha amylase. So, in short, time (in itself) doesn't affect body near as much as temp. does.
|
I think you're close. At the lower temps you will get more fermentable sugars and I think that is why the longer mash time is needed. But I could be wrong.
Never have I needed to go that long though. I will for the most part go with a 45 minute mash and a 10 minute mash-out. If I need a little more time I will go to 60 minutes and a 10 minute mash-out.
Do an Iodine check to know if you're done or not.
__________________
TWO FISTED BREWING CO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_cad
Its nice when you and your friends have comparable equipment.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walker-san
some people will tap anything that has a hole.
|
Buy Two Fisted Brewing gear
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 01:50 PM
|
#6
|
|
Vendor and Brewer
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Piscataway, NJ
Posts: 20,669
Liked 462 Times on 327 Posts Likes Given: 9
|
The length of the mash is a requirement of temp (hotter converts faster) but you can't discount the crush. A finer crush will convert faster too because each starch partical is more readily exposed to the heat and the enzymes. All else being equal, a longer mash is the safer bet when you control fermentability with temp.
__________________
BrewHardware.com
Sightglass, Refractometer, Ball Valve, Weldless bulkhead, Thermometer, Decals, Stainless Steel Fittings, Compression Fittings, Camlock Quick Disconnects, Scale, RIMS tube, Plate Chiller, Chugger Pump, Super Clear Silicone Tubing, and more!
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 06:03 PM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MQT da U.P.
Posts: 135
|
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 12:41 AM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wilson, NC
Posts: 28
|
First time poster (applause)
I just did a batch of a golden ale that I mashed at ~144F for 90 min. It's been in the primary for 2.5 weeks now. I overshot my planned OG by a bit due to a higher than expected efficiency. Started at 1.084 and is now 1.014 and still bubbling every 6 seconds or so. Point of this is it's quite dry already. First time I used a lower temp. Hopefully it will be good.
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 02:42 AM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,538
Liked 4 Times on 3 Posts
|
Modern malts have alot of enzymes and convert quickly, even at lower temperatures. The best way to control your body is to be consistent in your mash process and then adjust temperature accordingly. I wouldn't adjust your mash time. Pick one - say 60 minutes - and always use that and then increase or decrease your mash temperature to dial in the fermentability you want. Even 2 degrees will result in a noticeable difference in your FG and the body of your beer.
GT
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|