Advertise Here
Main · BrewSpace · Recipes · Wiki · Groups · Clubs · Gallery · Reviews · Video · Blogs · Store

Bottling wand for Perlick 525/75, AKA Bowie BottlerUltra Portable Kits - $74.95, Kegconnection.comMemorial Day Sale KegCo
Go Back   Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2008, 05:20 PM   #1
Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 38
Default Mash Ratio

What is the best Mash Ratio Qts/LBS?


jbodkin is offline Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 05:27 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
McKBrew's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Silverdale, Washington
Posts: 8,275
Blog Entries: 2
Default

The standard is 1.25 qts/lb. I personally have went down to 1 qt/lb to minimize the water above my grainbed.
McKBrew is offline Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 05:40 PM   #3
mew
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 849
Default

kai did some experiments on this. Here's the writeup in pdf form. He was also a guest on Basic Brewing Radio on November 20th.

To summarize his results, mash thickness does not have a significant affect on attenuation, but thinner mashes (2 qts/lb) resulted in a sizeable increase in efficiency.

One thing I have wondered about, however, is that it may be that the ratio of mash to sparge water is a greater influence on brewhouse efficiency than mash thickness alone. So, thin mashes may increase efficiency for low-gravity brews, but it may decrease efficiency in high-gravity brews because there would be so little sparge water.
mew is offline Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 06:07 PM   #4
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 569
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McKBrew View Post
The standard is 1.25 qts/lb. I personally have went down to 1 qt/lb to minimize the water above my grainbed.
What efficiency do you get with 1 qt/lb?
__________________
Merrimack Valley Homebrew Club

http://mvhbc.com/
thedude123 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 06:09 PM   #5
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
 
Revvy's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: "Detroitish" Michigan
Posts: 36,054
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mew View Post
kai did some experiments on this. Here's the writeup in pdf form. He was also a guest on Basic Brewing Radio on November 20th.

To summarize his results, mash thickness does not have a significant affect on attenuation, but thinner mashes (2 qts/lb) resulted in a sizeable increase in efficiency.

One thing I have wondered about, however, is that it may be that the ratio of mash to sparge water is a greater influence on brewhouse efficiency than mash thickness alone. So, thin mashes may increase efficiency for low-gravity brews, but it may decrease efficiency in high-gravity brews because there would be so little sparge water.
+1 on this, in fact they even talked about it on a basic brewing VIDEOcast as well...And brought up our very own Kai once again.
__________________

Revvy's one of the cool reverends. He has a Harley and a t-shirt that says on the back "If you can read this, the bitch was Raptured. - Madman

I gotta tell ya, just between us girls, that Revvy is HOT. Very tall, gorgeous grey hair and a terrific smile. He's very good looking in person, with a charismatic personality... he drives like a ****ing maniac! - YooperBrew
Revvy is offline Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 06:13 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
McKBrew's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Silverdale, Washington
Posts: 8,275
Blog Entries: 2
Default

I can't really speak for efficiency yet. I've done it on two batches and my efficiency increased to 70% from 65%, but based on the information here, it shouldn't have. I attribute my increased efficiency to my sparge water being hotter and the grainbed getting close to 170 on the sparge.

Just for the heck of it, I think I'll try a thin mash next time.
McKBrew is offline Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 06:43 PM   #7
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 569
Default

Ya I use about 1.5-1.75 qt/lb.
__________________
Merrimack Valley Homebrew Club

http://mvhbc.com/
thedude123 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 10:54 PM   #8
ajf
Senior Member
 
ajf's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,047
Default

I almost always mash as 1 qt / lb, but according to numerous sources, that is a standard for English beers (which I brew).
I have also experimented with a thinner mash (1.25 qts / lb). I did not detect a noticeable change in efficiency, but the thinner mashes definitely resulted in a thinner tasting beer.

-a.
ajf is online now Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 11:09 PM   #9
Senior Member
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 569
Default

what efficiency do you normally get?
__________________
Merrimack Valley Homebrew Club

http://mvhbc.com/
thedude123 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2008, 01:08 AM   #10
ajf
Senior Member
 
ajf's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,047
Default

85% Mash/Lauter. 75 - 82% brewhouse depending on boil duration, amount of hops, and how much I leave in the kettle.

-a.


ajf is online now Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Water to Mash Ratio Darwin18 All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 21 11-01-2009 03:07 PM
Partial mash - what should my water to grain ratio be? bonzombiekitty Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 6 10-27-2009 02:56 PM
Is mash grain/water ratio important? beretta All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 9 09-25-2009 03:30 AM
Mash water/sparge water ratio Philsc Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 4 06-08-2009 11:15 PM
Wet:Dry ratio david_42 Recipes/Ingredients 3 09-05-2006 02:33 AM





Contact Us - Top - Privacy - All times are GMT. The time now is 07:21 PM.
Copyright © Group Builder, Inc - All Rights Reserved
Craft Beer & Brewery Forum