New Giveaway - Wort Monster Conical Fermenter!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > Jiggawatt ale




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-05-2012, 07:32 PM   #1
caioz1jp
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: St. Clair Shores, Michigan
Posts: 166
Liked 5 Times on 3 Posts

Default Jiggawatt ale

So here is my insanity. I want to make a brew with the OG approx 1.210. Like in back to the future the delorian needs 1.21jiggawatts (yes i know its actually gigawatts) to power the flux capacitor. I would think we are looking at a barleywine most likley but it would be awesome to make something lemony. If any one has a suggestion please post here. At work right now so i cant really attempt to build a recipe.



__________________
caioz1jp is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-05-2012, 08:55 PM   #2
daksin
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
daksin's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 4,033
Liked 267 Times on 234 Posts
Likes Given: 321

Default

You're going to have a pretty tough time mashing that much grain- 40lbs at least. That's 10 gallons of strike water at 1 qt/lb, which is too thick to even really get decent efficiency. Your best bet would be to mash as much grain as you can comfortably and sparge it very well, and then boil down to your desired OG- you'll likely only end up with a few gallons of wort in the end, and an extremely high FG. Doesn't sound particularly tasty to me. At that gravity you're actually bumping up against the alcohol tolerance of WLP099, but you won't ferment down that far anyway due to all the unfermentables you'll have. Plus WLP099 is not a very tasty yeast.



__________________

I can't be arsed to keep up this list of what's in the fermenters, but hey, check out the cool brewery I'm opening up!

twitter.com/twokidsbrewing .. facebook.com/twokidsbrewing .. twokidsbrewing.com

daksin is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-05-2012, 10:52 PM   #3
BreezyBrew
Fully Fermented.
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BreezyBrew's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New Tampa, FL
Posts: 968
Liked 93 Times on 68 Posts
Likes Given: 46

Default

Why not incorporate the 121 number with the hops instead?

__________________

- 99% Perspiration 1% Beer
- Always brew your best.
- "Be sure to protect the beer from marauding squirrels" - Radical Brewing

BreezyBrew is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-06-2012, 12:46 AM   #4
caioz1jp
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: St. Clair Shores, Michigan
Posts: 166
Liked 5 Times on 3 Posts

Default

hmmmmm i like that. Maybe Use Sorachi Ace or that electrifying lemon taste lol

__________________
caioz1jp is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-06-2012, 01:00 AM   #5
kaboom133
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Grapeville, PA
Posts: 170
Liked 20 Times on 16 Posts
Likes Given: 9

Default

Quote:
That's 10 gallons of strike water at 1 qt/lb, which is too thick to even really get decent efficiency.
I regularly mash at 1 qt per lb with 75% to 80% efficiency. At 77% with 21 lbs of 2-row its 5.25 gallons and about 1.210 O.G.
__________________
kaboom133 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-06-2012, 01:02 AM   #6
MathiasMicrobrew
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 114
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Maybe a double IPA with 121 IBUs and an OG OF 1.21.. you can use lemon zest in the secondary as well as some C hops for added citrusyness hah. I personally love citra for that kinda flavor.

__________________
MathiasMicrobrew is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-06-2012, 02:50 AM   #7
tennesseean_87
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
tennesseean_87's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 1,180
Liked 83 Times on 60 Posts
Likes Given: 105

Default

That's not a double IPA. More like a septuple IPA.

__________________
#8 Corks in Belgian Bottles Hold Carbonation
Increasing Pipeline Diversity
On Deck: Hefeweizen yeast experiment with 3068, T-58, and 3711
Youtube Chanel on Pipe Smoking
tennesseean_87 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-06-2012, 03:00 AM   #8
TheBeerist
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TheBeerist's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Ana, CA
Posts: 243
Liked 9 Times on 9 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaboom133 View Post
I regularly mash at 1 qt per lb with 75% to 80% efficiency. At 77% with 21 lbs of 2-row its 5.25 gallons and about 1.210 O.G.
What is the biggest beer you have done? Many people--myself included--tend to obtain far lower efficiency with high gravity brews. Considering the fact that your beer would be ultra high gravity, I can only speculate that your efficiency loss might scale negatively.
__________________
TheBeerist is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-06-2012, 05:37 AM   #9
kaboom133
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Grapeville, PA
Posts: 170
Liked 20 Times on 16 Posts
Likes Given: 9

Default

I did a stout last week that was 1.088, 1 qt/lb and 4.5 gallons into the fermenter. Beersmith says 78% efficiency. That's the biggest beer I've ever tried with that thick of a mash. I double batch sparged, and ground the living crap out of my grains with a pound of rice hulls in the mash.

__________________
kaboom133 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-06-2012, 06:39 AM   #10
WilliamWS
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 286
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaboom133 View Post
I regularly mash at 1 qt per lb with 75% to 80% efficiency. At 77% with 21 lbs of 2-row its 5.25 gallons and about 1.210 O.G.
Recheck your math.
I believe you're looking at about 1.114 with 21lbs @77% for 5.25 gal.

For 1.210 you'd need 38.7lbs of 2-row @77%.

...and as has been mentioned you're not going to get 77% for gravity that high (unless you sparge half the day and boil for the other half).

For me it's somewhere between 1.090 and 1.100 that my efficiency starts taking a noticeable hit. At 1.100 I'm probably around 4-5 points lower than my normal efficiency and it gets worse the higher I go. I could continue sparging to rinse out all of the sugar that's being left behind but then I'd be looking at a 3-4 hour boil to get down to volume. No thanks.


__________________
WilliamWS is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools
Display Modes