goswell

Recipes 

I have a bizarre problem. I recently moved and just now got my brewery up and running. For my first two batches I am somehow ending up with almost a full gallon extra runoff after the sparge. The only thing that has changed is my the water I am using and Midwest Supplies has a new grain mill setup. Other than that, nothing has changed. Can the crush somehow affect water absorption by the grain? Can water chemistry somehow have an affect on this problem? I'm stumped.

I mash at about 1.3 qt/lb in a Colemen Extreme 36 qt cooler.

bull8042

Recipes 

That's weird... I might be inclined to think that if the grains are not all crushed very well, they may not absorb as much water.
I really can't see water chemistry affecting absorption to any significant degree.

__________________
"I brew with a water cooler and some part from the toilet." - JohnnyO

"I do gravity feed the last gallon or two through my Therminator, but I expect you could suck start a Volkswagen before you could suck start one of these. - GilaMinumBeer

"..... Bull was right." - TXCurtis

flyangler18

Recipes 

Are you measuring your first runnings and calculating your sparge volume based on that number?

goswell

Recipes 

My measurements haven't changed. I've always assumed the same grain absorption, I then use that number to get my mash out water for the first runnings. The mash water, minus absorption, plus mash out water should equal half of the total wort I want to collect. The water for the second runnings has always been half of the total I want to collect.

I could let the problem go if it were an extra quart, but I'm getting over a gallon extra! It doesn't make sense.

EvilTOJ

Recipes 

It sounds to me like your maths are off somewhere. For your next batch, measure the water in every stage, from mash to boil. Don't assume the grainbed absorption, calculate what it is! Measure the water in to the mash, then out again and that should tell you what the actual absorption rate is.

__________________
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."

flyangler18

Recipes 

Don't just rely on theoretical values of absorption (i.e. .10-.12 gallons/lb of grain); there are too many variables that could skew one way or another.

Just measure the volume of your first runnings and calculate your sparge volume based on that real-world number to hit your target volume.

goswell

Recipes 

Yeah, I know I could do that but they always say you get better efficiency if the first and second runnings are equal.....

flyangler18

Recipes 

I say you'll notice an increase in efficiency by matching the volumes of the second and third runnings.

If you are targeting 8 gallons pre-boil, and get 2 gallons from the first runnings then your sparge volume should be 6 gallons, split into two 3 gallon volumes.

david_42

Recipes 

Has your efficiency changed?

__________________
Remember one unassailable statistic, as explained by the late, great George Carlin: "Just think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of them are even stupider!"

MilwaukeeBrewGuy

Recipes 

this is the main reason why I will be fly sparging.