Kegconnection Complete Starter Kit and More Giveaway!


Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > Grain Crush for Better Mash Efficiency

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-02-2013, 08:47 PM   #1
EROK
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ingleside, IL
Posts: 203
Liked 8 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 33

Default Grain Crush for Better Mash Efficiency

Wondering where to go from here.... I have read a ton on mash efficiency.....I have consistently gotten low efficiency from batch sparging and can't really nail down the cause other than the crush. I set my Barley Crusher at .034 and have tried going smaller than that only to find that the grains will not go thru the mill at .026-.030. My PH is in check according to JP's spreadsheet, and sparge temp has been raising the grain bed to approx 160-170 for sparging. I stir twice during the mash and again after the batch sparge water is put in wait ten minutes, vorlauf and drain.

Have heard from several respected sources that runoff rate for 1st runnings and sparging either make for better efficiency BUT then others say to runoff as fast as possible as runoff rate does not matter in batch sparging.

I need a way to crush smaller (with my mill) and a way to know "for sure" what my runoff speed should be.

Any proven ideas would be much appreciated. Thanks !

__________________
EZ BREWING CO. - No Stress -- Just Do Your Best !



Chuck Norris is the only person to ever beat Andre the Giant in a drinking contest. And he did it by a two case margin.

EROK is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 01-02-2013, 09:00 PM   #2
jCOSbrew
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 609
Liked 37 Times on 33 Posts
Likes Given: 7

Default

Define low efficiency? You should be able to easily get 70% using a batch sparge and 60 min mash.

Crush is not the problem.

Check your thermo. Are you hitting mash temp and holding within a few degrees? Is it a large grain bill? What water to grain ratio? How do you calc efficiency? Mash or brew house?

__________________
jCOSbrew is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 01-02-2013, 09:04 PM   #3
nickelmcgee
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Bartlesville, OK
Posts: 33
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 8

Default

OK, try adding about 3% water to the grain, spray on with a water bottle wait about 45 minutes then crush the grain. I’ve found that I can consistently crush at about 0.023 when I follow this technique. It leave the hulls almost completely intact and crushes the meat to almost flower. My efficiencies have been above 80% and I don’t experience the stuck sparges that I once did. The technique is covered here;

http://www.homebrewtalk.com/wiki/ind...t_Conditioning

__________________
nickelmcgee is offline
histo320 Likes This 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 01-02-2013, 09:13 PM   #4
ETCS
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ETCS's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Smithfield, VA
Posts: 602
Liked 21 Times on 20 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

I always got about 68 - 70% efficiency. The other day...I had to make a run to the store and had to leave the mash for an extra 45 minutes (I was planning on a 60 min mash @ 154 and wound up doing a 105 min mash @ 154. After it was all said and done..my efficiency went up to 78%

__________________

Brewers make wort, Yeast make beer!!!!

ETCS is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 01-02-2013, 09:52 PM   #5
CastleHollow
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CastleHollow's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Midlothian, VA
Posts: 636
Liked 90 Times on 64 Posts
Likes Given: 50

Default

Not sure about the proper setting, since I get my grains crushed at purchase. However, my efficiency improved nearly 5 points when I switched to a new LHBS, and that was the only difference in my brewday, so I know it's related to his mill. My typical efficiency is in the 78% range, although I recently hit 83% on a saison. Here's my technique and equipment:

MLT is a 54qt Coleman cooler, I built this copper manifold, I use 1.25qt/lb in just about all my beers, once I shut the cooler lid I don't open it again until it's time to vorlauf (i.e., I only stir once,) first runoff rate is kinda slow, I sparge at the same temps as you, sometimes will double sparge, and my second runoff rate starts slow but then I usually get impatient and throttle up.

Not sure if any of that is helpful, but it's been working for me, so maybe there's a trick in there that will help you.

__________________
CastleHollow is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 01-02-2013, 10:13 PM   #6
histo320
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Manteno, IL
Posts: 1,044
Liked 31 Times on 22 Posts
Likes Given: 8

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nickelmcgee View Post
This is great info to know. I may try this for my next batch.

I have only done one all grain where I used 9 lbs of grain in a 5 gallon cooler. My temp dropped after mashing in even though I added water at the specified temp Beersmith gave me with pretty accurate inputs. I also pre-heated the cooler to 155F for 1 hour before mashing in.

My efficiency was about 50%. My grain crush was using a Corona style grain mill set a size of a credit card. My crush looked like in the pictures above.

My first run and my sparge got stuck as I did not tie off the bag (I do not have a false bottom), so I was forced to pour the wort through a strainer into my brew pot.

Hopefully my next attempt will be improved.
__________________
Tyler's Brewhaus

Drinking - The Plinian Legacy, Cream of Three Crops
Primary - Air
Secondary - Air
Up Next - Oberon Clone
histo320 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 01-03-2013, 01:45 AM   #7
Malticulous
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: St. George Utah
Posts: 4,027
Liked 48 Times on 39 Posts
Likes Given: 47

Default

I keep my Barley Crusher at .030. When the knurl wore out it would not grab the malt anymore. BC fixed it.

__________________
Malticulous is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 01-03-2013, 01:51 AM   #8
EROK
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ingleside, IL
Posts: 203
Liked 8 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 33

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malticulous View Post
I keep my Barley Crusher at .030. When the knurl wore out it would not grab the malt anymore. BC fixed it.
How many batches have you done? I have done over 100 batches now and wonder if that could be it ? One other question, do you drain slow or just let it rip ?
__________________
EZ BREWING CO. - No Stress -- Just Do Your Best !



Chuck Norris is the only person to ever beat Andre the Giant in a drinking contest. And he did it by a two case margin.

EROK is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 01-03-2013, 02:06 AM   #9
Malticulous
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: St. George Utah
Posts: 4,027
Liked 48 Times on 39 Posts
Likes Given: 47

Default

I did a lot more than 500 gallons worth before it was a problem. I mill a lot of wheat too. I still wish I would have gotten a mill with larger diameter rollers.

__________________
Malticulous is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 01-03-2013, 06:00 AM   #10
kshuler
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
kshuler's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 281
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

I was a BIAB brewer until recently and noticed my mash efficiency went way up the finer I would grind. When I switched to a HERMS system, I assumed that keeping a fine grind would keep a higher efficiency, and I did my first HERMS batch with a grind at 0.028. This led to about 73% efficiency. I had read threads saying that some people use a grind that is more coarse and got very high efficiencies. I made the next batch with a grind of 0.039 purely as an experiment, expecting to get lower efficiency rather than higher. I was, however, shocked, that efficiency went UP to 90.7%. I think this was due to the fact that I could recirculate faster than I could with the finer grind.

Just my experience.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beer_Maker View Post
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into.

-------------------------------------------
http://www.bokehtests.com
http://web.mac.com/kshuler/Site/Welcome.html
kshuler is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Grain crush - low efficiency Francis All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 18 07-11-2012 03:49 AM
LHBS Grain Crush & Efficiency headfullahops All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 47 04-13-2011 11:38 PM
grain crush efficiency increase RJSkypala All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 6 01-20-2010 11:05 PM
grain crush/efficiency/online suppliers VTBrewer All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 3 04-15-2009 03:21 PM
Best efficiency from grain crush? Craig5_12 General Techniques 4 02-08-2007 02:27 PM