Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > Efficiency varies..... Wtf




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-07-2012, 03:34 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: , NY
Posts: 185
Default Efficiency varies..... Wtf

Have been doing my own milling for about 6 months and my efficiency has been anywhere from 70-85%........what gives?? Have made no adjustments to mill and have verified that my gap has not changed. Hitting temps also. What else could it be??


dukes7779 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-07-2012, 04:26 PM   #2
Read aloud: I'm a dumbass
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
tre9er's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 3,918
Liked 171 Times on 147 Posts
Likes Given: 8

Default

bulk grain or buy each time? Do you check your crush as you mill? Particle size of kernels could change from batch to batch and cause fewer/more cracked grains.

Has anything in your process changed, ie. stirring techniques during, before, after mash/sparge? There has to be some subtle nuance.


__________________
_________________________________
Skal!
Den Faaborg Bryggeri

Quote:
Originally Posted by davekippen View Post
Open log Fermenting and gas-can secondary?? I am planning my next brew right now!!
tre9er is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-07-2012, 04:32 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: , NY
Posts: 185
Default

Buy in bulk, maybe different stirring during mash/sparge. Anything else I should be aware of??
dukes7779 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-07-2012, 04:35 PM   #4
Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JakeFegely's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Royersford, PA
Posts: 112
Default

There is a good sticky at the top of this section about maximizing efficiency when batch sparging. The sparge /lauter process can have a big impact on efficiency.

The mash process can also affect it. Whenever I use pilsner grain, I need to step mash or I lose efficiency.
__________________
I thought raising kids required patience until I started trying to convince yeast to make beer.
JakeFegely is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-07-2012, 05:11 PM   #5
Read aloud: I'm a dumbass
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
tre9er's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 3,918
Liked 171 Times on 147 Posts
Likes Given: 8

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dukes7779 View Post
Buy in bulk, maybe different stirring during mash/sparge. Anything else I should be aware of??
pretty much your crush, avoiding dough-balls and stirring well before and after the mash and each sparge addition are the keys.
__________________
_________________________________
Skal!
Den Faaborg Bryggeri

Quote:
Originally Posted by davekippen View Post
Open log Fermenting and gas-can secondary?? I am planning my next brew right now!!
tre9er is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-07-2012, 05:47 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ambler
Posts: 1,658
Liked 33 Times on 30 Posts
Likes Given: 16

Default

Is it the same recipe? If not, efficiency generally suffers with larger grainbills. When I'm doing higher gravity beers, I adjust my efficiency in Beersmith down.
BrewThruYou is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-07-2012, 05:58 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Reading, Massachusetts
Posts: 181
Liked 9 Times on 7 Posts

Default

I had a pretty low efficiency when starting out. I was averaging 60%. I changed the rate of draining my mash tun from as fast as I can to taking 20-30 minutes to drain my mash tun and another 20 minutes to drain my sparge water. This increased my efficiency to 75%. I guess the moral of the story is even the smallest tweak you do whether you realize you are doing it or not can make a big difference in your efficiency. Just be consistent with your process and the efficiency should stabilize.
arnoldk2 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-07-2012, 11:21 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 68
Default

How fast do you mill? If I rip thru the grain fast w my drill - then I get 90%. If I slow it down around 200 rpms, then I get 75%...just what I notice...
Coohang is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-07-2012, 11:25 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Tiverton, Rhode Island
Posts: 3,761
Liked 202 Times on 164 Posts
Likes Given: 54

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coohang View Post
How fast do you mill? If I rip thru the grain fast w my drill - then I get 90%. If I slow it down around 200 rpms, then I get 75%...just what I notice...
Really? I read another thread where the consensus, with corona mills, was that milling as slow as possible would increase efficiency.
kh54s10 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 06-08-2012, 12:08 AM   #10
Emperor of the Universe
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 1,205
Liked 24 Times on 24 Posts

Default

Hi

Do you measure the input by weight or volume? If by weight, the moisture content may be varying (can be a 10% item - yikes!).

Anything that results in a finer crush will likely increase efficiency. Packing grain into the mill, running faster / slower (depending on the mill). Gap setting drifting with time. All will mess things up.

Lots of variables.

Bob


carlisle_bob is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools
Display Modes




FOLLOW US ON