 |
08-25-2012, 08:42 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 361
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts
|
Crazy High Efeciency - I think my LHBS Shop's Scale is off
|
|
I've been brewing all grain for about a year and a half now. The #'s for today's batch were startling. Either I got 97% efficiency, or my local shop gave me 8 extra lbs of grain. I'm thinking that it may be more like 7 extra lbs and their grinder is a bit on the tight side, as it to quite a while to drain the mash & sparge.
|
|
|
08-25-2012, 10:54 PM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2012
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 84
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts Likes Given: 8
|
Eight pounds is a lot of grain, unless you are doing a 10 gallon batch of a big beer, you should have noticed it was heavy. I look at the bag for a RIS and compare that to a simple beer with 10 to 12 pounds of grain and I can tell the difference from across the room.
|
|
|
08-25-2012, 11:03 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Tiverton, Rhode Island
Posts: 3,738
Liked 202 Times on 164 Posts Likes Given: 54
|
8 pounds of extra grain??? That would almost double most of my recipes!
I suspect either you have gotten rotten efficiency on your previous batches as a comparative or you made a miscalculation somewhere.
IMO 97% is near impossible!
Bet it will be good!

|
|
|
08-25-2012, 11:16 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 361
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts
|
My #s are definitely accurate. I checked them with bot a hydrometer and refractometer. It was a 12 gallon batch (22.5lb grain bill) so I am figuring it had to be additional grain. The bag is marked with my exact order. I am just trying to figure out what the extra is.
|
|
|
08-26-2012, 02:14 AM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Posts: 1,175
Liked 121 Times on 104 Posts Likes Given: 136
|
Not gonna help you now, but this is why I always weigh out my own grains, even if it's just weighing the one pound bag from the supplier before I pour it in.
As they say, "Trust no one."
|
|
|
08-26-2012, 02:19 AM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 361
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zeg
Not gonna help you now, but this is why I always weigh out my own grains, even if it's just weighing the one pound bag from the supplier before I pour it in.
As they say, "Trust no one."
|
Lesson learned. I primarily buy bulk grain and grid it myself. Today's batch was a Vienna lager. I don't use Vienna often enough to justify keeping it in bulk, so u just emailed my order.
|
|
|
08-26-2012, 02:44 AM
|
#7
|
|
Stay Rude, Stay SHARP
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 3,561
Liked 408 Times on 315 Posts Likes Given: 114
|
Did you calculate numbers by software? Might want to check the numbers it has for the malt. For example, I know Hopville's Beer Calculus has generic Golden Promise at 32ppg, when I've always seen it higher than that.
__________________
Up Next: Saison, Tripel
Primary: Accidental Lambic
Secondary: Chili Pepper Smoked Porter(s)
Bottled: Brett B. Tripel, Dubbel, Imperial Red, Robust Porter, Black IPA, Cal Common, Islay Scotch Ale, Chinook/Vienna SMaSH, Kolsch, APA, ESB, Oatmeal Stout, Tafelbier
Kegged: Cream Ale, Northern English Brown
|
|
|
08-26-2012, 05:24 AM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 652
Liked 19 Times on 16 Posts Likes Given: 6
|
You can ballpark the initial weight if you still have the mashed grain. Assuming grain soaks up about 1.25 quarts/lbs, and one gallon of water weighs 8.34 pounds...
__________________
Primary/Secondary/Bottles/Kegged: Delicious, delicious beer
|
|
|
08-26-2012, 11:42 AM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Guilford, Indiana
Posts: 23
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
|
Your mash would have been extremely thick if you didn't compensate for the extra grain. Just the mash volume alone should have raised questions.
|
|
|
08-26-2012, 03:02 PM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 361
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zymurgist05
Your mash would have been extremely thick if you didn't compensate for the extra grain. Just the mash volume alone should have raised questions.
|
It did seem a bit thick, however being that I am batch sparging with realitively thin ratio to start with, this can be tough to tell.
I went back through all of my #'s this morning, and it is coming in to be exactly 6 lbs high on the base malt.
I am going to investigate how they pull their orders. At the shop I use, the grain is all stored upstairs, and they just go pull it for you. I'm not sure if they measure all at once or several lbs at a time. My personal scale maxes out at 6 lbs, so I am wondering if theirs is similar. Another possibility, they may have used a different container on their scale prior to pulling my order and it been zero'd at -6lbs without them realizing it.
The other factor that is leading me toward extra grain is that my initial mash temp came in low by 3 degrees. I haven't had more than a 1/2 degree variance in a long time. The additional grain would explain this.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
Scale down help
|
metalpysko |
All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing |
9 |
12-04-2011 10:51 PM |
|
Scale down recipe
|
trevorc13 |
All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing |
6 |
12-10-2010 01:38 AM |
|
Scale-up factor?
|
robertjohnson |
All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing |
3 |
04-26-2009 05:24 AM |
|
Homebrew Scale
|
thdewitt |
All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing |
17 |
02-20-2009 05:35 PM |
|
How's this for a scale?
|
Bobby_M |
All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing |
15 |
04-20-2007 03:50 PM |
|
|
|