 |
02-20-2012, 03:27 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Big Lake, MN
Posts: 314
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts Likes Given: 5
|
Can you check this for us... (sparge water)
|
|
So we have a recipe here that we are having issues with deciding on how much sparge water to use...
12lbs. 4oz. Golden Promise
6oz. Caramel 60
We are going with 4gallons for our mash...how much typically do you use when you start to sparge?
How can you increase your efficiency since for some reason we are only getting half of what we put into our tun...meaning for 4 gallons of water we seem to be getting just over 2 gallons...is that right?
__________________
[B]Hayes' Public House..."Ales Inspired by Heritage"[B]
|
|
|
02-20-2012, 03:33 PM
|
#2
|
|
Mustang2Minivan<4mos
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hamden, CT
Posts: 7,772
Liked 706 Times on 685 Posts Likes Given: 208
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugs13
So we have a recipe here that we are having issues with deciding on how much sparge water to use...
12lbs. 4oz. Golden Promise
6oz. Caramel 60
We are going with 4gallons for our mash...how much typically do you use when you start to sparge?
How can you increase your efficiency since for some reason we are only getting half of what we put into our tun...meaning for 4 gallons of water we seem to be getting just over 2 gallons...is that right?
|
You have to remember that the grain is going to act like a sponge when you add the water. During your mash, the grain absorbs the water that you enter into it. Only the wtaer that is cannot hold onto will pass through to your brew kettle (along with all of the delicious converted sugars).
Good news is that makes calculating your sparge water volume fairly simple. If you can measure your first runnings, and say it's 2 gallons, you'll need to sparge with approximately 4.5 gallons to achieve your target preboil volume of 6.5 gallons. This is so because your grain has reached maximum absorbancy.
Hope that helps.
__________________
Fermenting: Nothing
Drinking: APA, My Own Personal Helles
On Deck: American Wheat
|
|
|
02-20-2012, 03:34 PM
|
#3
|
|
Read aloud: I'm a dumbass
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 3,916
Liked 171 Times on 147 Posts Likes Given: 8
|
You will absorb 0.19g. of water per pound of grain, sometimes less, depending on your method. So you're coming out right on the 2g. of first-runnings, no worries there.
If you're coming out with 2g. first runnings and looking for 5g. in the FV, you'll need about 4.5g. of sparge water to make 6.5 in the BK, boil off a gallon probably, and then trub/hop losses would bring it close to 5g in the fermenter. This is ballparking and based on a 60m boil with 1g/hr boiloff rate.
__________________
_________________________________
Skal!
Den Faaborg Bryggeri
Quote:
Originally Posted by davekippen
Open log Fermenting and gas-can secondary?? I am planning my next brew right now!!
|
|
|
|
02-20-2012, 03:46 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,527
Liked 333 Times on 273 Posts Likes Given: 25
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tre9er
You will absorb 0.19g. of water per pound of grain, sometimes less, depending on your method. So you're coming out right on the 2g. of first-runnings, no worries there.
|
In my experience it's been more like 0.13 gallons per pound when using a dedicated mash tun, and yesterday when doing BIAB and "squeezing" the bag I ended up with more like 0.1 gallons per pound absorption.
|
|
|
02-20-2012, 04:09 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,494
Liked 70 Times on 64 Posts Likes Given: 26
|
According to BeerSmith and Promash, grain absorbs 0.12 US gallons per lb. (very close to 0.13).
You will also probably have some dead space in the MLT. Add the dead space to the absorption, and (if your system is anything like mine), a tad over 2 gallons collected looks to be about right.
-a.
__________________
There are only 10 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and those that don't.
|
|
|
02-20-2012, 04:38 PM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Big Lake, MN
Posts: 314
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts Likes Given: 5
|
Man you guys are awesome! This is super helpful and saves a lot of time of experimenting. No wonder we did not hit our FG last time! We were WAY off and made a huge mistake of overly topping off with water...I know dumb move...I read somewhere for a nice sparge you can also get a calculatation approximately 1/2g. per lbs. of grain you are using. I however like all your thoughts on see where you are at after your first runnings. Then calculate how much to put in to get to about 6.5g. or even 6g. Thanks again guys!
__________________
[B]Hayes' Public House..."Ales Inspired by Heritage"[B]
|
|
|
02-20-2012, 05:52 PM
|
#7
|
|
Read aloud: I'm a dumbass
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 3,916
Liked 171 Times on 147 Posts Likes Given: 8
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by weirdboy
In my experience it's been more like 0.13 gallons per pound when using a dedicated mash tun, and yesterday when doing BIAB and "squeezing" the bag I ended up with more like 0.1 gallons per pound absorption.
|
I'm using .1 for BIAB w/bag squeeze, too. I'm not boiling off as much water, either, so I have to halve that figure as I've been high on my recent recipes.
__________________
_________________________________
Skal!
Den Faaborg Bryggeri
Quote:
Originally Posted by davekippen
Open log Fermenting and gas-can secondary?? I am planning my next brew right now!!
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|