 |
|
03-11-2011, 07:17 AM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bosnia and Herzegovina
Posts: 582
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
brewing ten gallons with 6 gallons boil pot
|
|
Hi there,
By now I brewed a 6 gallon batches, but finally I got some bigger fermentation buckets that could hold up to 10 gallons.
I have a pot that makes 6 gallons of beer with no problem....
If I make a high gravity wort and boil it with hops enough for 10 gallons, and then after boil I just top up with water - would it be ok?
what are the advantages and disadvantages of brewing like this?
thanks
__________________
Brew me a river...
|
|
|
03-11-2011, 11:17 AM
|
#2
|
|
/bɪər nərd/
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NYC / Kathmandu
Posts: 7,220
Liked 793 Times on 534 Posts Likes Given: 315
|
Very low efficiency, for starters, just because you wouldn't be sparging at all.
Beyond that, I'd imagine it's just the standard issues with partial boils: lower hop utilization, darker color, etc.
|
|
|
03-11-2011, 11:22 AM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bosnia and Herzegovina
Posts: 582
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalFet
Very low efficiency, for starters, just because you wouldn't be sparging at all.
Beyond that, I'd imagine it's just the standard issues with partial boils: lower hop utilization, darker color, etc.
|
no, I intend to sparge as normal and get, for instance, 6 gallons of 1.070 wort prior to pitching. then I would just top up with 3 gallons of boiled water and dilute this wort to lower gravity.
__________________
Brew me a river...
|
|
|
03-11-2011, 11:27 AM
|
#4
|
|
/bɪər nərd/
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NYC / Kathmandu
Posts: 7,220
Liked 793 Times on 534 Posts Likes Given: 315
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 400d
no, I intend to sparge as normal and get, for instance, 6 gallons of 1.070 wort prior to pitching. then I would just top up with 3 gallons of boiled water and dilute this wort to lower gravity.
|
Fair enough, but you'll still be sparging and mashing with less water than you ordinarily would for a 9 gallon batch.
|
|
|
03-11-2011, 11:29 AM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: central NJ
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 400d
no, I intend to sparge as normal and get, for instance, 6 gallons of 1.070 wort prior to pitching. then I would just top up with 3 gallons of boiled water and dilute this wort to lower gravity.
|
Yeah, but that's poor efficiency. Cause you're mashing to get ~7 gal at ~1.060 preboil grav, when you could be mashing to runoff 10 gal at 1.030 to make the same OG beer with a full boil. See what I mean?
|
|
|
03-11-2011, 11:32 AM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bosnia and Herzegovina
Posts: 582
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaythebassist
Yeah, but that's poor efficiency. Cause you're mashing to get ~7 gal at ~1.060 preboil grav, when you could be mashing to runoff 10 gal at 1.030 to make the same OG beer with a full boil. See what I mean?
|
sure, but that's why I ask what are the exact consequences?
If I still get good beer using this technique, than I don't see why not doing it. On the other hand - I'd rather have 6 gallons of good beer instead of 9 gallons of bad or average beer, if you know what I mean....
__________________
Brew me a river...
|
|
|
03-11-2011, 11:46 AM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: central NJ
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 400d
sure, but that's why I ask what are the exact consequences?
If I still get good beer using this technique, than I don't see why not doing it. On the other hand - I'd rather have 6 gallons of good beer instead of 9 gallons of bad or average beer, if you know what I mean....
|
Well, you won't get the same hop utilization, but other than that there's no reason you shouldn't get good beer. It'll just be way less cost-effective.
|
|
|
03-11-2011, 11:46 AM
|
#8
|
|
/bɪər nərd/
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NYC / Kathmandu
Posts: 7,220
Liked 793 Times on 534 Posts Likes Given: 315
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 400d
sure, but that's why I ask what are the exact consequences?
If I still get good beer using this technique, than I don't see why not doing it. On the other hand - I'd rather have 6 gallons of good beer instead of 9 gallons of bad or average beer, if you know what I mean....
|
Like I said before, lower efficiency, lower hops utilization, and darker color. Plenty of people do partial boils with extract; the only added consideration for all grain is the lower efficiency.
|
|
|
03-11-2011, 11:50 AM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bosnia and Herzegovina
Posts: 582
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalFet
Like I said before, lower efficiency, lower hops utilization, and darker color. Plenty of people do partial boils with extract; the only added consideration for all grain is the lower efficiency.
|
If efficiency is the only cost I have to pay, than I'll just do it. What bothers me now is what efficiency should I have in 6 gallons in order to get 1.050 after adding 3 gallons of water to it?
__________________
Brew me a river...
|
|
|
03-11-2011, 11:53 AM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: central NJ
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 400d
If efficiency is the only cost I have to pay, than I'll just do it. What bothers me now is what efficiency should I have in 6 gallons in order to get 1.050 after adding 3 gallons of water to it?
|
I normally get around 80% eff, and when I did a 3/6 gal partial boil I got 50% eff.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|