Kegconnection Complete Starter Kit and More Giveaway!


Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > BIAB and mash thickness?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-20-2012, 05:15 PM   #1
Saxomophone
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SE Michigan, MI
Posts: 84
Liked 5 Times on 3 Posts

Default BIAB and mash thickness?

I'm going to give BIAB a try but I have a question about water volumes. I've read that most people say to start off with your full volume of water right from the start when you do your mash.

The only thing is, doesn't this give you a very watery mash? I have read that too thin a mash kills efficiency. If you are using a method that tends to have efficiency issues, why not use less water up front then add more after the mash is done?

Just wondering if anyone has an answer to this or if I am not understanding the process.

__________________
Saxomophone is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2012, 05:20 PM   #2
samc
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 5,420
Liked 53 Times on 50 Posts
Likes Given: 29

Default

If you have room for all the grain & liquid then that is the easiest way to BIAB. Some notice an efficiency boost by holding back water for a sparge, but it does make it slightly more complex as you need a separate vessel with sparge water.

__________________
samc is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2012, 05:44 PM   #3
BigRob
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 604
Liked 18 Times on 17 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

I recently sewed myself a new bag, and used it for a full volume BIAB, I used to run 80-81% with my sparge step BIAB, I ran 76% with the full volume boil.

So to be honest, I'm not noticing a huge efficiency difference, and the cleanup and time saved make up for the slight drop.

__________________
BigRob is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2012, 06:19 PM   #4
Saxomophone
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SE Michigan, MI
Posts: 84
Liked 5 Times on 3 Posts

Default

I think maybe the thinner mash is supposed to inhibit enzyme activity...maybe that's why they say to do a 90min mash?

How do you do your sparge? Do you the dunk in another pot method or poor water over the grain bag suspended over your kettle?

__________________
Saxomophone is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2012, 07:05 PM   #5
tre9er
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 4,372
Liked 232 Times on 196 Posts
Likes Given: 35

Default

They say the enzymes are further spread out so therefore they have harder time converting the starches...not sure if this is the truth or a theory, but it kinda makes sense...

I mash in a cooler with the bag lining it, then pull the bag, dunk in the sparge volume in the BK, let it soak for 10 minutes after stirring, then pour first runnings in afterwards. I've screwed up my water volumes (still figuring my absorption and boiloff rates) twice and I predict I'm in the 75%+ range doing it this way.

__________________

_________________________________
Skal!
Den Faaborg Bryggeri

Quote:
Originally Posted by davekippen View Post
Open log Fermenting and gas-can secondary?? I am planning my next brew right now!!
tre9er is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2012, 07:14 PM   #6
usfmikeb
Feedback Score: 5 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Posts: 3,172
Liked 233 Times on 200 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

I'm doing BIAB with less water than is required, and usually run some sparge water through the bag as it's dripping into the kettle. I'll add more water after a small sparge to get to preboil volume on my system. After tweaking my mill settings over several batches, I'm now hitting 75-80% efficiency every time. I setup my recipes based on 75% efficiency, and anything above that just results in higher ABV.

__________________
usfmikeb is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2012, 11:28 PM   #7
1MadScientist
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
1MadScientist's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Panhandle of Florida, USA
Posts: 411
Liked 16 Times on 13 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

If you got a big enough pot add all the water needed upfront.

Edit: I was just going to say that I get around 81-82% efficiency with all the water added upfront.

__________________

In Cat Beers - I've Only Had One

BIABrewer.info / Closed-system pressurized fermentation technique

Brewing with MS; http://www.flickr.com/photos/madscie...473769/detail/

1MadScientist is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-20-2012, 11:44 PM   #8
RM-MN
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Solway, MN
Posts: 6,461
Liked 707 Times on 594 Posts
Likes Given: 221

Default

With the full volume of water in the mash for BIAB the enzymes were so diluted that I only got 80% efficiency.

Oh, you used less water in your conventional tun and got 65%? I guess the enzymes must have been too concentrated.

Think about both of these statements above and tell which is wrong.

__________________
RM-MN is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-21-2012, 02:02 AM   #9
TopherM
Vinz Clortho - the Keymaster of Gozer the Gozerian
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TopherM's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 3,699
Liked 376 Times on 297 Posts
Likes Given: 20

Default

Here's a good article with the technical info:

http://www.byo.com/stories/technique...mash-thickness

BIAB has the advantage of being able to more finely crush grains, because BIAB has no possibility of a stuck sparge. Finer crush = more conversion at any water volume = ability to adequately do full volume mashes.

__________________

Primary #1 - Oktoberfest
Primary #2 - EMPTY!
Primary #3 - EMPTY!
Secondary #1 - Downtown Flanders Brown (brewed August 2012)
Keg #1 - Cherry Wood Smoked Cider
Keg #2 - Fall of the Ukraine Baltic Porter (lagering in keg)
Keg #3 - EMPTY!
Bottled - NONE!

TopherM is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-21-2012, 04:13 AM   #10
XpeedeeX
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: San Luis Obispo
Posts: 34
Default

Don't know what BIAB means but here is some food for thought on mash thickness. Most breweries will have a mash thickness of 4-5:1. This is because the more concentrated the starch molecules are the more they inhibit the enzymes to work at their maximum speed. However a thicker mash will protect the enzymes in higher temperatures.

__________________
XpeedeeX is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mash tun false bottom and mash thickness shushikiary All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 2 11-29-2011 08:13 PM
thickness of mash? jtoddlarson All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 3 11-23-2011 12:14 AM
Mash Thickness Armen_Tamzarian All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 8 08-15-2011 09:11 PM
All grain mash thickness Mpavlik22 All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 8 04-07-2011 03:55 PM
Mash thickness question Wild Duk All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 1 11-01-2008 08:16 PM