Happy HolidaySs Giveaway - Winners Re-Re-Re-Re-Drawn - 24 hours to Claim!

Get your HBT Growlers, Shirts and Membership before the Rush!


Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > Best efficiency
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-21-2013, 05:22 AM   #1
Roadie
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
Roadie's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Olathe, Kansas
Posts: 1,525
Liked 93 Times on 82 Posts
Likes Given: 13

Default Best efficiency

Brewed today and had a discussion about efficiency with someone. He said you don't really want efficiency greater than 80% but I thought more was better. Thoughts?

__________________

Almost Famous Brewing Co.

Check out our E-brewery.

Roadie is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-21-2013, 05:56 AM   #2
Black Island Brewer
An Ode to Beer
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Black Island Brewer's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Isla Negra
Posts: 1,412
Liked 349 Times on 220 Posts
Likes Given: 204

Default

It helps me to remember that 100% efficiency would be grinding the malt to flour and doing a multiple hour mash. Not good for making good beer, but great for determing extract potential. Above a certain efficiency you may extract undesirable flavors, mostly tannins, but that will be impacted by the pH and the water to grist ratio. I am currently getting around 82% mash conversion efficiency, but that's with really good Pacific Northwest water and a mash tun with recirculation capability. I don't seem to be extracting tannins with this arrangement.

__________________
"Oh don't give me none more of that Old Janx Spirit/No, don't you give me none more of that Old Janx Spirit/For my head will fly, my tongue will lie, my eyes will fry and I may die/Won't you pour me one more of that sinful Old Janx Spirit"
Black Island Brewer is online now
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-21-2013, 05:57 AM   #3
JuanMoore
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JuanMoore's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Old Pueblo
Posts: 17,164
Liked 3253 Times on 3153 Posts
Likes Given: 20

Default

Some people feel that with higher efficiency there are more unwanted flavors extracted, and that the wort from a more moderate efficiency set-up is higher quality.

Commercial brewers usually strive for really high efficiency because it translates to huge differences in cost. At the homebrew scale an extra pound of grain per batch usually isn't a big deal, so consistency is typically more important than high efficiency.

__________________
Keezer Soze

Yuri rubs it out with 60 grit... wouldn't even feel a tenga egg. -Randar

, place entry ox dixla to suck. Fcxk fwnpoo and passed. Hel an my spupid ass. OK. - TXCrash
JuanMoore is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-21-2013, 06:11 AM   #4
Culbetron
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 127
Liked 11 Times on 10 Posts

Default

I heard John Palmer talking about this. He said that he's tasted a lab condition mash with 100% extraction and it tasted terrible. Very high on tannins. Since that's not what we want our beer to taste like, we try to hit the balance between making the most of the grain we have and not extracting tannins from it - hence 75-85% efficiency.

__________________
Culbetron is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-21-2013, 08:12 PM   #5
Roadie
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
Roadie's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Olathe, Kansas
Posts: 1,525
Liked 93 Times on 82 Posts
Likes Given: 13

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Culbetron
I heard John Palmer talking about this. He said that he's tasted a lab condition mash with 100% extraction and it tasted terrible. Very high on tannins. Since that's not what we want our beer to taste like, we try to hit the balance between making the most of the grain we have and not extracting tannins from it - hence 75-85% efficiency.
This is exactly what was quoted to me. I was thinking 90% was ideal but maybe the ideal number is lower than I thought. On Kal's Electric Brewery setup (we're putting a similar system together) I thought he said he's getting 90+% efficiency but maybe that's not necessarily a good thing then?
__________________

Almost Famous Brewing Co.

Check out our E-brewery.

Roadie is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-21-2013, 09:02 PM   #6
Oginme
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Oginme's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: , NH
Posts: 461
Liked 43 Times on 41 Posts
Likes Given: 92

Default

"Best" is a relative term when it comes to efficiency. The best efficiency is the one that gives you a good tasting beer with consistent results brew after brew. It will differ greatly from person to person, system to system depending upon the equipment set up and the grind of the grist as well as other things.

If you are getting good results and your efficiency is fairly consistent, I wouldn't worry too much about it. Kick back and pop open another home brew!

__________________
Oginme is online now
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-21-2013, 09:20 PM   #7
d_striker
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: CO Springs, CO
Posts: 316
Liked 13 Times on 12 Posts
Likes Given: 17

Default

With a non-recirculated, single infusion mash that was fly-sparged, I consistently obtained around 81% efficiency.

I got a pump and started recirculating my mash. My efficiency jumped to 91% with no astringency. IMO, as long as pH is controlled you shouldn't be extracting tannins from the husks.

__________________
d_striker is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-25-2013, 05:32 PM   #8
drawdy10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: brookings, sd
Posts: 367
Liked 18 Times on 16 Posts
Likes Given: 9

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by d_striker
With a non-recirculated, single infusion mash that was fly-sparged, I consistently obtained around 81% efficiency. I got a pump and started recirculating my mash. My efficiency jumped to 91% with no astringency. IMO, as long as pH is controlled you shouldn't be extracting tannins from the husks.
How consistent is this claim? 10% from the investment of a pump or if I were to sit there and just vorlauf the whole time seems like a lot. Is this really the only variable you changed? Malt, water, mash tun, crush all the same? Sorry I don't mean to sound interrogating I am just amazed. I have used different mash tuns and different methods and always seem to get 71-73, with 73 bein my sweet spot for some reason usually.
__________________
drawdy10 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-26-2013, 01:04 PM   #9
BigFloyd
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BigFloyd's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 4,813
Liked 628 Times on 549 Posts
Likes Given: 575

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JuanMoore View Post
Some people feel that with higher efficiency there are more unwanted flavors extracted, and that the wort from a more moderate efficiency set-up is higher quality.

Commercial brewers usually strive for really high efficiency because it translates to huge differences in cost. At the homebrew scale an extra pound of grain per batch usually isn't a big deal, so consistency is typically more important than high efficiency.
This ^^^^^^^. I'm perfectly happy getting 76% so long as it remains consistent and predictable.
__________________
Good Temp Control -----> Happy Yeast ------> Tasty Brew
BigFloyd is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 10-26-2013, 02:49 PM   #10
songe
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Kristiansand, Norway
Posts: 133
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

How do you determine efficiency? my total amount of fermentables where around 12.5lb and i got an OG of 1.090 at 6 gallons.... :S

__________________
songe is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply



Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do people report mash efficiency or brewhouse efficiency? thisoneguy All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 66 07-25-2012 06:37 AM
Mash Efficiency vs Brewhouse Efficiency exe Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 22 12-22-2011 07:09 PM
Mash efficiency vs Post boil efficiency RootDownBrewing Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 1 08-21-2011 01:33 PM
Increassing efficiency or making up for low efficiency mcarb All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 20 01-12-2011 04:29 PM
calculating efficiency vs brewhouse efficiency inchrisin General Beer Discussion 1 01-25-2010 12:50 AM



Newest Threads

LATEST SPONSOR DEALS