 |
01-23-2013, 02:22 AM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4
|
Batch Scaling Question
|
|
I'm a moderately experienced all grain brewer with about 15 batches under my belt. I recently acquired a larger brew kettle and was thinking about scaling up my batches to 8-10 gallons and splitting between two carboys. I currently have a 5 1/2 gallon mash tun which works great for 6 gallon batches with 11-13 lbs of grain mashing at 1.5 qt/lb. My question is this:
Would I be able to achieve decent efficiency if I were to mash, say, 18-20 lbs of grain TWICE at a thickness of approximately 0.8 - 0.9 qt/lb before sparging? It seems like this would be a way to avoid mashing two different groups of grains in my smallish mash tun. I know people use this method to make different strength beers with their first and second runnings (traditional partigyle), but I was thinking of just combining two runnings to make a larger volume of wort. I understand mash thinkness can affect the body of the beer and efficiency of the mash, but was hoping to get others thoughts?
|
|
|
01-23-2013, 12:30 PM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 449
Liked 27 Times on 20 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
I think if you are dedicated to making the move to bigger batches, I would upgrade the mash tun. Chances are you can save your braid, false bottom or manifold from your current tun and just buy a bigger cooler.
I would say that would be the easiest solution rather than having to do multiple mashes in a tiny tun. You can find bigger coolers for pretty cheap. I got a 10 gallon for like $15 off of craigslist.
|
|
|
01-23-2013, 07:43 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 3,567
Liked 60 Times on 58 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by durand532
Would I be able to achieve decent efficiency if I were to mash, say, 18-20 lbs of grain TWICE at a thickness of approximately 0.8 - 0.9 qt/lb before sparging?
|
what do you mean by mashing the grain twice?
|
|
|
01-23-2013, 07:54 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 153
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
I don't believe there would be much wort produced with mash #1. Isn't mash #2 just a low temp sparge?
|
|
|
01-23-2013, 08:09 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4
|
What I mean is I'd mash the grains at 152 for an hour, collect the runnings, mash again with another volume of water at 152, collect the second runnings, then sparge at 170.
|
|
|
01-23-2013, 08:22 PM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 3,567
Liked 60 Times on 58 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
you can't mash grain twice, once conversion is done its done, that'd just be a long batch sparge.
the method people do for higher gravity you're thinking of is mashing a second set of grains in the runnings
|
|
|
01-23-2013, 08:28 PM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Malden, MA
Posts: 1,403
Liked 96 Times on 93 Posts Likes Given: 51
|
The results will be more like a extra sparge. There is a point when more grain produces less sugar, and it sounds like you are approaching that. See here for details:
http://woodlandbrew.blogspot.com/2012/12/when-more-grain-doesnt-add-more-sugar.html
__________________
Woodland Brewing Company Brewing science for those of us without a Ph.D
BLOG: Brewing Boiled Down and learn more on The WBC You Tube Channel Ready to drink: Champagne Cider, 50c 28c and 19c Ale, Adventinus clone. Up next: Douppleweizenbock, Eisbock, Saision Terri, Raspberry Cream Ale
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|