Get your HBT Growlers, Shirts and Membership before the Rush!

 Home Brew Forums > adjusting old partial grain recipe to full grain
11-27-2012, 07:00 AM   #1
daggers_nz
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 183
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 13

 adjusting old partial grain recipe to full grain

hi there I wanted to take this partial grain recipe and get rid of the LME:

Pale (4.5 lb)
Crystal 10L (0.5 lb)
Carapils (0.5 lb)
Wheat (0.5 lb)
Light LME (3.3lb)

so I've calculated how much percentage each grain makes up in the total grain bill (excluding the LME) and then multiplied it by the mass of the LME to get the additional amount of each grain to add to the original bill.

ie. Pale = (4.5lb / 6lb) = 0.75
4.5lb + (0.75 * 3.3lb) = 6.975lb

and the end result is:

Pale (6.975 lb)
Crystal 10L (0.775 lb)
Carapils (0.775 lb)
Wheat (0.775 lb)

is this correct or have I done it wrong, missed anything etc. Left out the hops as that will stay the same anyway

thanks

__________________
Primary: American Amber
Secondary:
Conditioning:Belgian Strong Dark, Belgian Stout
Drinking: Belgian IPA, Basil Lime Saison, Dark Saison, WY1007 Kolsch, Centennial Blonde

11-27-2012, 09:41 AM   #2
ChandlerBang
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,038
Liked 24 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Quote:
 Originally Posted by daggers_nz hi there I wanted to take this partial grain recipe and get rid of the LME: Pale (4.5 lb) Crystal 10L (0.5 lb) Carapils (0.5 lb) Wheat (0.5 lb) Light LME (3.3lb) so I've calculated how much percentage each grain makes up in the total grain bill (excluding the LME) and then multiplied it by the mass of the LME to get the additional amount of each grain to add to the original bill. ie. Pale = (4.5lb / 6lb) = 0.75 4.5lb + (0.75 * 3.3lb) = 6.975lb and the end result is: Pale (6.975 lb) Crystal 10L (0.775 lb) Carapils (0.775 lb) Wheat (0.775 lb) is this correct or have I done it wrong, missed anything etc. Left out the hops as that will stay the same anyway thanks
The LME is replaced directly with 2-row. You don't need to scale the entire grain bill. In fact, doing so will completely change the recipe.

You need to calculate the gravity of the LME you are replacing, then figure out from there how much grain to use. LME is 38 pppg (potential points per gallon or 1 pound of LME in one gallon of water will yield an SG of 1.038)
You need 125.4 points (38x3.3lbs) to replace the LME.

2-row is 37pppg (I think? Someone please correct?) however, you won't get 100% extraction. Let's figure 80% because I have no clue what your efficiency looks like. Sooo....

125.4/37/.8=4.23lbs of 2-row making your recipe look like this.
Pale (8.73 lb)
Crystal 10L (0.5 lb)
Carapils (0.5 lb)
Wheat (0.5 lb)
Light LME (3.3lb)

I just reread this and realized you said pale malt. The pppg may be different than 2-row, but the math is still the same.
__________________
Quote:
 Originally Posted by D_Struct I would've made a crayon schematic if I thought this was going to hang people up.

11-27-2012, 10:24 AM   #3
ChandlerBang
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,038
Liked 24 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 2

__________________
Quote:
 Originally Posted by D_Struct I would've made a crayon schematic if I thought this was going to hang people up.

11-27-2012, 10:32 AM   #4
ChandlerBang
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,038
Liked 24 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ChandlerBang Here is a decent reference.
Ha. According to this chart most 2-row is 38ppg and the pale ale malt varies from 36 to 37. So my math ought to be pretty close given 80% extraction eff.
__________________
Quote:
 Originally Posted by D_Struct I would've made a crayon schematic if I thought this was going to hang people up.

11-27-2012, 07:33 PM   #5
daggers_nz
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 183
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 13

cheers

__________________
Primary: American Amber
Secondary:
Conditioning:Belgian Strong Dark, Belgian Stout
Drinking: Belgian IPA, Basil Lime Saison, Dark Saison, WY1007 Kolsch, Centennial Blonde

11-27-2012, 08:54 PM   #6
mooshimanx
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: san diego, california
Posts: 215
Liked 20 Times on 17 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ChandlerBang I just reread this and realized you said pale malt. The pppg may be different than 2-row, but the math is still the same.
"Pale malt" is one of those frustrating terms that can mean virtually any type of base malt depending on who is saying it and in what context (i.e. I believe that Beersmith considers 2 row base malt "US Pale Malt"). Ironically, the term "2-row" should technically be more ambiguous (since virtually all malts used in homebrewing are 2 row) but it almost always means US malted 2 row pale malt.
__________________

11-27-2012, 09:12 PM   #7
dcp27
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Medford, MA
Posts: 4,095
Liked 121 Times on 117 Posts
Likes Given: 3

the general rule of thumb is 1lb 2-row = 0.75lb LME = 0.6lb DME, so just double your pale from the original recipe and you'll be close enough

__________________

11-29-2012, 08:34 PM   #8
kingwood-kid
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: houston
Posts: 1,438
Liked 91 Times on 84 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Most extract isn't just 2-row. It usually has a little carapils added. Since you already have carapils, c-10 and wheat (man, that beer must have been pure foam), you won't need to replace the missing carapils. In a different recipe, you might want it.

__________________

Say no to intolerance: love gluten and lactose.

 Quick Reply Message: Options Quote message in reply?