Home Brew Forums > 98% efficiency. Is this possible?

10-14-2012, 05:53 AM   #1
Fatt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 48
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

 98% efficiency. Is this possible?

So I'm wondering if I did my math wrong, but I've double checked by hand, and by online calculators. I somehow got 98% efficiency with my system and I'm wondering if this is even possible, or if anyone has had a similar experience. Don't get me wrong, if it's right then that's fantastic but I'd prefer to be consistent around my normal 80-85% so I know what to expect. Check it out.

Grainbill
Maris Otter- 6lb
Crystal 60L- 1lb 10oz
Munich 10L- 1lb 10oz
Pale chocolate- 9oz
Black Patent- 6oz
Chocolate- 4oz

Total grainbill- 10lb 7oz

Mashed with 14qts, sparged with 24 qts to collect 7.2 gallons wort at a corrected gravity of 1.051. Boiled till I had 5.75 gallons at which the gravity was 1.065. (65x5.75 = 373points) and the 100% potential is 1.069 for 5.5 gal or (69x5.5 = 379).... 373/379=0.98 or 98%

Am I wrong or is this real or is this some kind of fluke? Input?

10-14-2012, 06:05 AM   #2
Erroneous
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 585
Liked 23 Times on 21 Posts

Well seeing how maximum potential is tested in lab environments then yes it is possible. You can always go over procedures to make sure you read the right number (calibrate your hydro, read the bottom of the miniscus, correct for temperature, etc). I'd imagine though you'd have to have a very fine crush to get those numbers but many people regularly get in the 90s

10-14-2012, 06:17 AM   #3
weirdboy
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,574
Liked 351 Times on 284 Posts
Likes Given: 26

There are many possible reasons, but the most likely answer is that there is a measurement error somewhere along the way.

Did you personally measure all your grain before milling it? How sure are you about those numbers? That is the mostly likely source of error, assuming your gravity readings are correct.

The other likely candidate is the volume measurement. Maybe you took your volume reading when the wort was still hot, and thus it would read a bit higher due to thermal expansion.

10-14-2012, 06:18 AM   #4
Fatt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 48
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Yea I corrected for temps and all that good stuff. Read from the meniscus and what not. I guess I'm just blown away by the 98%. My last three brews were 76, 83, 80 and then a 98 from nowhere.

10-14-2012, 06:21 AM   #5
weirdboy
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,574
Liked 351 Times on 284 Posts
Likes Given: 26

I have had unusually high OGs too. I've also had unusually low ones. I guess anything can happen if you brew enough beer...

10-14-2012, 06:44 AM   #6
Fatt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 48
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Also yea I measure my own grain at the lhbs and mill it myself at home. Like I said, I've over this a billion times and I can't find an error.

10-14-2012, 01:39 PM   #7
Rev2010
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Bayonne, NJ
Posts: 1,555
Liked 60 Times on 40 Posts
Likes Given: 150

I'm much more inclined to believe there's an error somewhere. Have you checked and made sure your hydrometer is still accurate, that the paper hasn't slipped? Was the wort cooled to pitching temp before you took the hydro reading?

Rev.

10-14-2012, 02:39 PM   #8
Fatt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 48
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Hydrometer is still accurate. Reads zero with water. I always correct my readings too. Pretty much always have my thermometer on hand which I know is accurate as well.

02-02-2013, 11:06 AM   #9
brewfreeordie
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: manchester, nh
Posts: 71
Liked 8 Times on 8 Posts
Likes Given: 17

I just hit an ungodly number too and know in my bones I've got an error somewhere.

9lbs 2-row
1-lb Munich
1-lb Crystal-60L

6 gallons with an OG of 1.06 would give me an efficiency of 111%, which of course would mean I've broken the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.

I've either discovered a technology that will save the world, or the brew store slipped me a little extra in the grain bill. Still, I've struggled with my BIAB setup to get to 70%, and my post-mash grain weight was only 12.5lbs so regardless of the free 2-row my results remain anomalous.

02-02-2013, 11:43 AM   #10
jwwbrennan
Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews

Recipes

Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Stratford, PE
Posts: 135
Liked 10 Times on 9 Posts
Likes Given: 35

How did you mill the grain? Do you use a flour mill? I use a Champion set very close to the course setting. By changing it towards fine the efficiency goes up along with the astringency so I shoot for about 80%.

__________________
Mop and Pail In Vitro Homebrewing